Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Sadiq Khan's minicab congestion charge not discriminatory, rules High Court

LONDON mayor Sadiq Khan's decision to introduce the congestion charges for minicab drivers does not discriminate against ethnic minority and female drivers, the High Court ruled today (24).

The Independent Workers' Union of Great Britain (IWGB) had said that removing minicabs' exemption from the £11.50 daily fee indirectly discriminates against a 94 per cent black and minority ethnic (BAME) workforce.


The union said that 88 per cent of London's traditional black cab drivers were white and remained exempt from the charge.

It also pointed out that women, who are more likely to work part-time, were disproportionately affected, and disabled passengers would be adversely affected by a reduction in the number of available minicabs.

Giving a judgment in London, Justice Lewis said Khan was pursuing a legitimate way to reduce traffic and air pollution.

The judge said the decision was "a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, namely the reduction of traffic and congestion within the congestion charge zone without reducing the number of designated wheelchair-accessible vehicles."

In a statement after the ruling, a Mayor of London spokesman said: "We are pleased with the judge's decision.

"Removing the congestion charge exemption for private hire vehicles, apart from those that are wheelchair-accessible, is an important part of our plans both to reduce traffic volumes and congestion in London, with the additional benefits of reduced air pollution.'

In a statement, IWGB general secretary Jason Moyer-Lee said the union would appeal the ruling, saying: "The IWGB is not about to give up at the first set-back."

He added: "The judge, defendant Sadiq Khan, and we all agreed that this charge is bad for ethnic minority and female drivers.

"The question is whether or not the mayor can legally justify it by showing it's reasonable and there were no better alternative measures to reduce congestion.

"He hasn't done this and the judge adopted the incorrect legal test when assessing the matter. So now we take the fight to the Court of Appeal."

More For You

homelessness

2.7 per cent of private rented properties in England are affordable for people receiving housing benefit.

Getty Images

Nearly 300,000 families face worst forms of homelessness in England, research shows

Highlights

  • 299,100 households experienced acute homelessness in 2024, up 21 per cent since 2022.
  • Rough sleeping and unsuitable temporary accommodation cases increased by 150 per cent since 2020.
  • Councils spent £732 m on unsuitable emergency accommodation in 2023/24.


Almost 300,000 families and individuals across England are now experiencing the worst forms of homelessness, including rough sleeping, unsuitable temporary accommodation and living in tents, according to new research from Crisis.

The landmark study, led by Heriot-Watt University, shows that 299,100 households in England experienced acute homelessness in 2024. This represents a 21 per cent increase since 2022, when there were 246,900 households, and a 45 per cent increase since 2012.

More than 15,000 people slept rough last year, while the number of households in unsuitable temporary accommodation rose from 19,200 in 2020 to 46,700 in 2024. An additional 18,600 households are living in unconventional accommodation such as cars, sheds and tents.

A national survey found 70 per cent of councils have seen increased numbers approaching them for homelessness assistance in the last year. Local authorities in London and Northern England reported the biggest increase.

Keep ReadingShow less