Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Ripping into Rawat for jeans comments

Ripping into Rawat for jeans comments

By Amit Roy

THE Daily Telegraph’s fashion editor, Tamara Abraham, has ex­plained to me why she has ridi­culed Tirath Singh Rawat, the chief minister of Uttarakhand, who equated women wearing ripped jeans with moral decay.


Tamara said: “Mr Rawat’s comments were problematic for so many reasons – the idea that a pair of ripped jeans could have any effect on one’s moral compass is ridiculous, but I also doubt he would have had much to say about a man wearing the same thing.

“As a senior politician, he has a valuable platform and he’s wasting it by telling women what they should or should not wear, instead of tackling the very real problem of violence against women in India.”

Back in India, men – especial­ly senior politicians – feel they can get away with telling women how to dress so as “to protect In­dian culture”.

Tamara told her readers that ripped jeans became headline news in India after Rawat berat­ed an unnamed woman he had met on a flight: “‘You run an NGO, wear jeans ripped at the knees, move about in society. Children are with you, what val­ues will you teach?’ he said.”

Tamara announced her per­sonal protest: “I feel indifferent about ripped jeans as a style choice – that grey pair is gather­ing dust at the back of my ward­robe – but I’m inclined to start wearing them again in solidarity with women in India.”

“Sure, Rawat may never see me wearing mine,” she conced­ed. “But the only thing that will stop such politicians attaching conservative notions to innocu­ous garments is by normalising them. It’s a collective rebellion, and a way to tell the women of #rippedjeanstwitter that the world is on their side.”

Tamara made a serious point about the 2012 Delhi gang rape: “Like me, these women find it frustrating, because Rawat, as a political leader, is using his plat­form to criticise women, when instead he could be using it to protect them. Eight years on from the fatal gang rape of a 23-year-old student on a New Delhi bus, violence against women remains a huge problem in India. Though reliable data on physical attacks is unavailable, a former minister for women said around 70 per cent of India’s fe­male population are victims.”

More For You

Remembering together is more important than ever today

Chelsea Pensioners parade during the National Service of Remembrance at the Cenotaph on Whitehall in central London, on November 12, 2023. Remembrance Sunday is an annual commemoration held on the closest Sunday to Armistice Day, November 11.

Getty Images

Remembering together is more important than ever today

Why do traditions get invented? It often happens when there are identity gaps to fill. As the guns of the First World War fell silent, new rituals of public mourning were needed. The first national two-minute silence in November 1919 became known as the “great stillness”: everyone, everywhere seemed to stop. That moment struck such a public chord that it shaped a tradition of Remembrance that we continue a century later.

Yet silence was chosen back then partly because the Britain of 1919 was such a noisy, divided and fractious country. Luton Town Hall was burned down by veterans angry at the ticket prices for the Peace Day dinner inside, and the lack of jobs that made them unaffordable. A protest rally ahead of the first anniversary of the armistice opposed the government’s decision to leave the million dead buried in foreign fields, so that only the symbolic remains of the Unknown Warrior were brought home.

Keep ReadingShow less