Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Race to end workplace bias

by SUNDER KATWALA

Director, British Future


ONE year ago, the government published the Race Disparity audit, the most comprehensive guide yet to what needs to change to deliver equal opportunity in a multi-ethnic society.

Needing to show that momentum was being maintained, the government marked the anniversary with a new Race at Work charter, and began consulting on whether firms should have to report on the ethnic pay gap. Prime minister Theresa May said the goal was “to make sure the UK’s organisations, boardrooms and senior management teams are truly reflective of the workplaces they manage”.

Traditionally, ethnic discrimination has been seen primarily through the lens of its impact on the most socially marginalised. The audit captured how persistent gaps in criminal justice and mental health remain stark. Yet it also showed how the pattern of opportunity and disadvantage in Britain has never been more complex. We now need a broader race equality agenda to match it – able to address exclusion at the bottom, speak to the experiences of most people trying to get a fair return on their efforts at work, and one which now reaches confidently into the boardroom too.

FTSE 100 companies have had ethnic minority chief executives recruited from overseas, yet none  has ever promoted a British-born chief executive who is black or Asian to the top job.

The great success story of the last two decades has been in education. The aggregate ethnic penalty in educational attainment has disappeared, while white British outcomes are in the middle of the various groups. Ethnic minority Britons are now a bit more likely than their white British peers to be university graduates.

So, this is a moment of both potential and risk. If progress in education translates into the workplace, it can contribute much to a Great British take-off in the years ahead. Yet if that success gets blocked, the potential will curdle into frustration that the British promise of equal opportunities is not being kept.

The urgency of acting now can be seen from the ‘population pyramid’ of ethnic diversity in the UK. Britain’s ethnic minorities are the youngest and fastest-growing sections of British society. One quarter of school-age children are from ethnic minorities, compared to one in eight of the work force, and one in 16 of those are in senior positions.

Yet these demographics also highlight the problem of simply emulating the measures that have been adopted for gender and applying them to ethnicity if there are significant differences in the dynamics of the challenges in different spheres. If the focus is on reporting a headline “ethnic pay gap” snapshot, that may well generate more heat than light. It could mix up disparities which reflect unfair treatment and barriers to progression with those that result from the demographic generation gap between younger and older workers.

Only investing properly in analysis of recruitment, retention and progression – to illuminate what is happening across the generations, genders and different geographies – could inform the interventions to make change happen.

Whether the government has the bandwidth to make sustained interventions is the challenge. The building blocks are in place with the race disparity audit and the integration green paper, but both risk slipping off a government and political agenda that is more crowded than ever before.

At this year’s Conservative party conference, it sometimes felt as though half of the fringe meetings were about challenging the government for being too soft on Brexit, while many others worried about why the party was struggling to persuade young people that it shared their concerns.

The centrist pitch of the prime minister in Birmingham had many echoes of former prime ministers David Cameron (Conservative) and even Tony Blair (Labour), yet May was coming back to the centre-ground after a more polarising approach had been tried and failed. The theory of the snap 2017 general election was that the Conservative party could turn Britain’s 52-48 per cent division over Brexit into a political realignment, winning votes from Ukip and Labour’s Brexit supporters.

The Conservative problem was that those cast as “citizens of nowhere” were mobilised too. So it lost its majority, suffering significant political damage in university towns, with voters under 45 and ethnic minority voters too. Only being half as likely to win ethnic minority compared to white votes presents an existential challenge to the party.

So, the prime minister’s message is that the Tories would deliver Brexit without being defined by it. That may prove wishful thinking this autumn as the negotiations reach a crunch phase. Our society needs political parties which seek to bridge our deep divisions. The domestic agenda on equal opportunity – including on race – could be a big part of that. If we have to wait until this time next year for the next move, that may be too little, too late.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less