IT WOULD be fair to say that Prince Philip was not very well known to British Asians even though, as the Queen’s consort, he was at the centre of the ruling establishment for more than seven decades.
In marked contrast to his eldest son, Prince Charles, he was not seen at Asian functions.
But Asians have learned a great deal about him since he passed away last Friday (9), just two months short of what would have been his 100th birthday.
From the Asian point of view, it would also not be right to define him solely on the basis of his well-known gaffes. This is because he did touch the lives of British Asians in two ways – one direct and the other much more subtle.
Young Asian men and women have been among the hundreds of thousands who have benefited from the Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme which Prince Philip set up in 1956 to “recognise adolescents and young adults for completing a series of self-improvement exercises”.
There are branches all over the world, including one in India.
Among those who credit him for transforming their lives is Serena Gupta, 20, an undergraduate at Warwick University who picked up bronze, silver and bronze badges under the scheme.
By the time she went to Buckingham Palace to collect them, the duke had retired and his youngest son, Prince Edward, was officiating in his place.
The Queen and Prince Philip are welcomed by (from left) Indian vice-president Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, president Rajendra Prasad, Indian high commissioner to the UK, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, and prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru at Palam Airport in New Delhi on January 21, 1961 (Photo: Punjab/AFP via Getty Images).
Gupta said: “When I did the Duke of Edinburgh award, I took part in a year of volunteering in conservation – it made me really love it. I still volunteer now for English Heritage. I’ve been reading that Prince Philip was the only one who could act normally around the Queen – that makes me really sad that he’s gone.”
British Asians ought to acknowledge that their lives have been enriched immeasurably by living in a politically stable and tolerant country, which has partly resulted from a functioning constitutional monarchy. If the Queen has scarcely put a foot wrong through her long reign, some of the credit must go to her husband who gave her loyal and unquestioning support. Many British Asians have flourished in this country in a way that might not have been possible had they remained either in the Indian subcontinent or in Africa.
No one really knows what the Duke of Edinburgh thought of the big issues of the day, such as Black Lives Matter; a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multicultural Britain; how schools should teach the Empire or the Partition of India. He clearly made it a point not to speak about them in public.
One of the few Indians who said he got to know the man behind the public image is Lord Indarjit Singh, who said that Prince Philip believed in inter-faith dialogue.
His first trip to India, in 1959, was a solo one. Since he was the Queen’s husband, he was met at the airport by the prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru.
He became a committed conservationist and the first president of the World Wide Fund for Nature in 1961. But that same year he had toured India with the Queen, and controversially shot a tiger while staying with long-time friends, the Maharajah Sawai Man Singh II and Gayatri Devi, the youngest Maharani of Jaipur.
The Windsors and the Jaipurs do go back a long way. Although Indira Gandhi abolished titles, the present Maharajah, Sawai Padmanabh Singh, expressed his sadness at Prince Philip’s passing.
“This is truly the end of an era,” he said. “The royal house of Jaipur has been close to the royal family of Britain for generations. One of my ancestors, the late Maharaja Sawai Madho Singh II of Jaipur, was among the few princes from India invited to attend the coronation of King Edward VII in 1902.”
He recalled: “When Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip made a state visit to India in 1961, they asked to include Jaipur on their itinerary because of their personal equation. Prince Philip was a talented polo player, who has played on the Rambagh polo ground of Jaipur, just as our family has in England each summer.”
Indeed, Prince Philip was passionate about polo. At one game in Windsor, it was Gayatri Devi who presented the winning cup to him. It was her practice to send Prince Philip a box of Alphonso mangoes every summer.
All this is far removed from the world of British Asians, and Prince Philip’s gaffes and indiscretions are well known, of course.
The royal couple at Raj Ghat, the memorial for Mahatma Gandhi, in New Delhi on January 22, 1961 (Photo: Central Press/AFP via Getty Images).
In 1999, when he visited a high-tech electronics factory in Edinburgh and spotted a fuse box with protruding wires, he said the assembly looked “as if it was put in by an Indian”.
When some local Asians failed to share his sense of humour, Buckingham Palace offered an apology: “The Duke of Edinburgh regrets any offence which may have been caused. With hindsight he accepts that what were intended as light-hearted comments were inappropriate.”
When he saw a badge with the name, “Atul Patel” at a Buckingham Palace reception for the British Indian community in 2009, he could not resist a wisecrack: “There’s a lot of your family in tonight.”
That was an odd remark from someone who was himself an immigrant – from a Danish and Greek family with German blood. To his credit, however, he learned to walk behind the Queen and never sought to upstage her.
The TV presenter Andrew Marr angered some viewers who demanded his dismissal because of the way he had discussed the duke with his colleague, Reeta Chakrabarti. Pointing out that Prince Philip followed royal protocol by allowing the Queen to take precedence, Marr quipped: “He was always two steps behind, you know, like an Indian bride, as they say. He was always standing behind.”
India’s prime minister Narendra Modi recognised that Prince Philip was important in the context of UK-India relations. He was also a nephew of Lord Mountbatten, the last viceroy of India.
Modi was one of the first world leaders to pay tribute: “My thoughts are with the British people and the royal family on the passing away of HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. He had a distinguished career in the military and was at the forefront of many community service initiatives. May his soul rest in peace.”
Foolchand, 75, whose grandparents migrated from Gujarat to Mauritius, has drawn on more than four decades of NHS service to lay bare the depth of systemic inequality in the health service.
Launched at Wolverhampton Art Gallery on October 4, as part of Black History Month, the book is both a personal testimony and a broader historical examination of racism in the NHS.
Foolchand, a former nurse and tutor, told Eastern Eye, “The main reason I wrote this book was to speak up for NHS staff who face harassment and bullying, but cannot voice their experiences openly.
“Speaking out often exposes them to further harassment, bullying, and discrimination. I wanted to stand up for those who cannot speak for themselves while they continue working within the NHS.”
Foolchand, 75, whose grandparents migrated from Gujarat to Mauritius, has drawn on more than four decades of NHS service to lay bare the depth of systemic inequality in the health service.
He said, “The NHS is a mirror of society. Whatever values and hierarchies exist in society are absorbed into the NHS. And, unfortunately, much of this is rooted in white superiority.”
Foolchand began his career in September 1971 in rural Scotland. He later trained as a mental health nurse and worked in the Midlands and was a nurse tutor and lecturer at a university in the West Midlands. He has led university modules on health and race and previously served as a Mental Health Act Commissioner.
Since retiring, he has campaigned for equality and accountability in healthcare.
“Even though local communities were poor themselves, there was a deeply ingrained sense of hierarchy. People believed they were better than those from India, Mauritius or the West Indies,” he recalled. His career exposed him to persistent structural inequalities: black and Asian staff stuck in low-skill roles, denied promotion opportunities and channelled into less prestigious specialisms, such as mental health or elderly care.
“When I worked in Glasgow, mental health hospitals were full of Asian doctors,” he said. “Yet in general hospitals, 99 per cent of staff were white. This was not accidental. It was a form of institutional racism.”
The idea for the book began during the Covid-19 pandemic. Foolchand started keeping notes during Downing Street press conferences, aware that the crisis would expose deep inequalities. He said the pandemic proved his point. “Black, Asian and minority ethnic staff and patients suffered disproportionately during Covid-19. This was not simply bad luck; it reflected systemic failures in the NHS.”
One was the distribution of personal protective equipment (PPE). “Much of the PPE was designed for a white face model. It didn’t fit people who wore turbans, head veils, or had beards. That placed them at greater risk,” he said.
He reiterated what Eastern Eye reported during the pandemic – that overseas doctors, who formed a significant part of frontline staff, were often pressured to work with Covid patients and discouraged from speaking out.
“If they raised concerns, they risked their references, their training opportunities, even their visas. So many stayed silent. And tragically, many paid the price with their lives. At the height of the first wave, a memorial service in London remembered around fifty black and Asian GPs who died caring for patients,” he said.
Foolchand’s book traces racism in the NHS back to its creation in 1948, placing it in a broader historical and colonial context. He explores the history of his own family, that of colonialism in India and Africa, and the contribution of Asian and African soldiers in both world wars.
He recalled how millions of soldiers from the subcontinent and the Commonwea l t h fought alongside the British in both wars. “They faced segregation, lower pay, assault, and dismissal after the wars. When the NHS was created, racism was already embedded in society. That toxic environment has persisted,” Foolchand said.
He compared the treatment of Caribbean and Asian migrants with that of Polish migrants after the second World War. The Polish Resettlement Act of 1947 gave housing, employment and education to thousands of Polish people who could not return home.
But similar rights were denied to those arriving from the Caribbean or India.
Foolchand said the NHS must acknowledge the role of non-white staff and be held accountable for biased attitudes. He added, “Policies to address racism already exist, but they are rarely implemented. Senior managers must be held accountable. Race equality measures must be part of NHS performance criteria.” Representation is another crucial issue. Out of 122 NHS chief executives in England, only seven or e i g h t a r e f r o m minority backgrounds. “That means these voices are missing at the top. And without representation, decisions will not reflect the needs of all communities,” he said.
Foolchand also stressed that diversity policies need constant review. “We must ask: are they reducing discrimination? Are they improving promotion rates for black and Asian staff? Are they stopping good staff from leaving because of poor treatment?” He said individuals have a role to play too, asking them to “keep records, speak up, support each other, join trade unions”.
“These are not small acts. They are the foundation for change,” he said.
According to the author, Black History Month was the right moment to address these issues. He said, “We must document history. Many people don’t know that Asian and black soldiers fought in both world wars. History is not just about the past; it informs the present and shapes the future.”
Foolchand said tackling racism in the NHS was not as an isolated problem, rather it was part of a wider movement for justice. “Without black and Asian staff, there would be no NHS. In 1948, the service recruited heavily from India and other former colonies. If they had not done so, the NHS would have collapsed. We must remember and protect their contribution,” he said.
“This is about fairness, respect and dignity. It is about ensuring the NHS becomes a place where all staff and patients receive equal treatment.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.