Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

PepsiCo formally withdraws lawsuits against Indian farmers

AMERICAN multinational business giant, PepsiCo Inc has formally withdrawn lawsuits against Indian farmers that the snack food and drinks maker had accused of infringing its patent by cultivating a potato variety, the company and the growers said today (10).

PepsiCo had sued nine farmers for cultivating the FC5 potato variety, grown exclusively for its popular Lay's potato chips. The FC5 variety has a lower moisture content required to make snacks such as potato chips.


Soon after suing the farmers, PepsiCo came under political pressure from prime minister Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and some of its allies who asked the US company to withdraw lawsuits against potato farmers, who come from Gujarat, Modi's home state ruled by the BJP.

Bowing to pressure, PepsiCo on May 2 agreed to take its lawsuits back.

"It's a victory for us, but PepsiCo's decision to file lawsuits against the farmers has sullied their reputation and the company now must apologise," Anand Yagnik, the potato growers' lawyer told a news conference in Ahmedabad, the business hub of Gujarat.

The submission made in the court to withdraw lawsuits against the farmers "is in sync with its publicly stated position," a PepsiCo spokesman said.

(Reuters)

More For You

Nike

The ASA noted a lack of evidence showing the products were not detrimental to the environment when their whole life cycle was considered.

Getty Images

Nike, Superdry and Lacoste face ad ban in UK over 'misleading' sustainability claims

Highlights

  • Three major fashion retailers used terms like 'sustainable' without providing evidence.
  • ASA rules environmental claims must be clear and supported by high level of substantiation.
  • Brands told to ensure future environmental claims are backed by proof.
Advertisements from Nike, Superdry and Lacoste have been banned in the UK for misleading consumers about the environmental sustainability of their products, the Advertising Standards Authority has ruled.

The watchdog found that paid-for Google advertisements run by all three retailers used terms such as "sustainable", "sustainable materials" and "sustainable style" without providing evidence to support their green claims.

Nike's advertisement, promoting tennis polo shirts, referred to "sustainable materials". The sportswear giant argued the promotion was "framed in general terms" and that consumers would understand it as referring to some, but not all, products offered.

Keep ReadingShow less