PAKISTAN'S Supreme Court ruled on Thursday (7) that the National Assembly had been illegally dissolved, and ordered parliament to reconvene to hold a no-confidence vote that will likely see prime minister Imran Khan booted from office.
Khan asked the president to dissolve the assembly after the deputy speaker refused to allow a no-confidence vote against him on Sunday (3), but the Supreme Court said the action was illegal.
"All actions taken are of no legal effect and quashed," the court ruling said.
"The national assembly continues to remain in session."
The decision was met with jubilation by some in the capital, with cars loaded with opposition supporters racing through the streets and sounding their horns.
Khan claimed the opposition had colluded with the United States for "regime change" when the deputy speaker - a loyalist - refused to allow the no-confidence motion.
Simultaneously, Khan asked the presidency - a largely ceremonial office also held by a loyalist - to dissolve the assembly, meaning an election must be held within 90 days.
President Arif Alvi had already told the feuding factions to nominate candidates for interim prime minister and asked the country's election commission to fix a date for a new national ballot.
The opposition had refused to cooperate.
There had been high hopes for Khan when he was elected in 2018 on a promise of sweeping away decades of entrenched corruption and cronyism, but he struggled to maintain support with soaring inflation, a feeble rupee and crippling debt.
On Thursday (7) the rupee was trading at a historic low of 190 to the dollar, and the central bank raised the key interest rate by 250 basis points to 12.25 per cent - the biggest hike in over a quarter of a century.
Pakistan has been wracked by political crises for much of its 75-year existence, and no prime minister has ever seen out a full term.
Khan has blown anti-US sentiment into the political atmosphere by saying the opposition had colluded with Washington.
The cricketer-turned-politician says Western powers wanted him removed because he will not stand with them against Russia and China, and the issue is sure to ignite any forthcoming election.
The Supreme Court is ostensibly independent, but rights activists say previous benches have been used by civilian and military administrations to do their bidding throughout Pakistan's history.
Publicly the military appears to be keeping out of the current fray, but there have been four coups since independence in 1947 and the country has spent more than three decades under army rule.
(AFP)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Last month, the UK became the latest country to ban social media sites including Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram and Facebook for under-16s.
REUTERS
UK to introduce overnight social media curfew for 16 and 17-year-olds
Jul 15, 2026
THE UK government on Tuesday announced an overnight social media curfew for children aged 16 and 17, weeks after prime minister Keir Starmer unveiled a ban on social media use for under-16s.
Under the new measures, teenagers aged 16 and 17 will not be able to access platforms such as Instagram and Facebook between midnight and 6:00 am. The government also plans to introduce a default setting that disables features such as infinite scrolling for older teenagers.
Users will still be able to switch off these settings, although critics said the measures would be ineffective. It was not clear how the changes would be enforced.
Last month, the UK became the latest country to ban social media sites including Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram and Facebook for under-16s. The changes are due to come into effect in early 2027.
"Even as young people gain greater independence at 16, they should still be protected from the most addictive online features that can have a harmful impact on their wellbeing," technology minister Liz Kendall said in a statement.
"These measures will be crucial in helping young people get the sleep they need, focus on school and college, and spend more quality time with family and friends."
The measures also include checks on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots, requiring those under 18 to take regular breaks while using the platforms.
While some children's charities have welcomed the reforms as long-overdue protections, others have warned they could result in children using the internet in unsafe ways.
Australia in December became the first nation to ban people under 16 from social media, in a move that has seen mixed success.
Canada and the UAE are among other countries that have announced similar bans, while Indonesia began enforcing its ban for users under 16 in March.
Keep ReadingShow less






