PAKISTAN'S Supreme Court ruled on Thursday (7) that the National Assembly had been illegally dissolved, and ordered parliament to reconvene to hold a no-confidence vote that will likely see prime minister Imran Khan booted from office.
Khan asked the president to dissolve the assembly after the deputy speaker refused to allow a no-confidence vote against him on Sunday (3), but the Supreme Court said the action was illegal.
"All actions taken are of no legal effect and quashed," the court ruling said.
"The national assembly continues to remain in session."
The decision was met with jubilation by some in the capital, with cars loaded with opposition supporters racing through the streets and sounding their horns.
Khan claimed the opposition had colluded with the United States for "regime change" when the deputy speaker - a loyalist - refused to allow the no-confidence motion.
Simultaneously, Khan asked the presidency - a largely ceremonial office also held by a loyalist - to dissolve the assembly, meaning an election must be held within 90 days.
President Arif Alvi had already told the feuding factions to nominate candidates for interim prime minister and asked the country's election commission to fix a date for a new national ballot.
The opposition had refused to cooperate.
There had been high hopes for Khan when he was elected in 2018 on a promise of sweeping away decades of entrenched corruption and cronyism, but he struggled to maintain support with soaring inflation, a feeble rupee and crippling debt.
On Thursday (7) the rupee was trading at a historic low of 190 to the dollar, and the central bank raised the key interest rate by 250 basis points to 12.25 per cent - the biggest hike in over a quarter of a century.
Pakistan has been wracked by political crises for much of its 75-year existence, and no prime minister has ever seen out a full term.
Khan has blown anti-US sentiment into the political atmosphere by saying the opposition had colluded with Washington.
The cricketer-turned-politician says Western powers wanted him removed because he will not stand with them against Russia and China, and the issue is sure to ignite any forthcoming election.
The Supreme Court is ostensibly independent, but rights activists say previous benches have been used by civilian and military administrations to do their bidding throughout Pakistan's history.
Publicly the military appears to be keeping out of the current fray, but there have been four coups since independence in 1947 and the country has spent more than three decades under army rule.
(AFP)
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Insurer tried to claim that gold and silver stolen from their home was not covered by their policy (Photo for representation: iStock)
Insurer ordered to pay couple after gold theft dispute
Jan 07, 2026
A BRITISH couple have won an insurance dispute after their provider refused to pay compensation for stolen gold and silver, arguing that the items counted as fine art rather than personal belongings.
According to The Times, the couple, identified only as Mr and Mrs L, were victims of a burglary in which a gold bar and a block of silver were taken from their home, along with other possessions.
When they made a claim, their insurer, Fairmead Insurance, paid for some losses but rejected the claim for the precious metals. The company said the items fell under the policy’s category of fine art and collectables and were therefore not covered.
Mr and Mrs L challenged this view and took the case to the Financial Ombudsman Service, arguing that the gold and silver should be treated as personal possessions under their home insurance policy.
The ombudsman ruled in their favour. In his decision, ombudsman Mike Waldron said that although Fairmead’s policy definition of art and antiques mentioned gold and silver, this only applied if the items were antiques or had artistic value.
“I haven’t seen any evidence that shows the gold bar and silver block are antiques or have artistic merit,” Waldron said, adding that they could not reasonably be classed as fine art.
He ordered Fairmead to settle the original claim, pay 8 per cent interest, and provide an extra £100 to compensate the couple for the inconvenience caused.
“We take customer service extremely seriously and feedback from policyholders indicates they are happy with the service. However, we acknowledge there is always room for improvement and that is why we are continually looking at ways to make our service even better," a spokesperson for Fairmead Insurance was quoted as saying.Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
Current Issue
×
Terms and Conditions
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
© Copyright 2026 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Asian Media Group USA Inc










