British communications regulatory body Ofcom is set to investigate the continued failure of deliveries by the over 500-year-old postal company Royal Mail. The company has been accused of not complying with its service obligations for 2024–25.
The investigation follows recent admissions by Royal Mail. The company acknowledged that only 76.5% of first-class mail arrived within one working day, and 92.2% of second-class mail was delivered within three days. These figures fall short of the standards set by Ofcom. According to the watchdog, 93% of first-class mail should be delivered within one day of collection, excluding the Christmas period.
Their performance has improved slightly from last year’s 74.5%.
"We are actively modernising Royal Mail, and while these efforts are beginning to deliver results, we know there is still more to do," said Alistair Cochrane, Chief Operating Officer at Royal Mail. “Our quality of service is not yet where we want it to be,” he added.
Fines totalling £16 million were imposed on Royal Mail for delivery failures in both 2023–24 and 2022–23. “If we determine that Royal Mail has failed to comply with its obligations, we will consider whether to impose a financial penalty,” stated Ofcom on Friday.
The company has requested a change in rules concerning uniform pricing for first- and second-class mail across the UK. Proposals have also been made to introduce new, additional reliability targets.
Czech billionaire Daniel Křetínský has agreed to take over Royal Mail’s parent company, International Distribution Services (IDSI.L). However, the deal has been delayed and is now expected to close in the second quarter of 2025.
“Our research has shown the damaging consequences of late post, such as missed health appointments, fines, bills, and vital government communications. But with no alternative provider to choose from, people are forced to grapple with poor service year after year. With Ofcom considering relaxing the current delivery targets set for Royal Mail as part of the universal service obligation review, reliability remains a huge concern,” said Tom MacInnes, Director of Policy at Citizens Advice.
Royal Mail is aiming to improve reliability through “recruitment and retention, reducing sickness absence, extending delivery times and increased automation,” stated a company spokesperson.
Dr Malhotra, an advisor to US health secretary Robert F Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Action, also serves as Chief Medical Advisor to Make Europe Healthy Again, where he campaigns for wider access to vaccine information.
Dr Aseem Malhotra, a British Asian cardiologist, and research psychologist Dr Andrea Lamont Nazarenko have called on medical bodies to issue public apologies over Covid vaccine mandates, saying they have contributed to public distrust and conspiracy theories.
In a commentary published in the peer-reviewed journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, the two argue that public health authorities must address the shortcomings of Covid-era policies and acknowledge mistakes.
They note that while early pandemic decisions were based on the best available evidence, that justification cannot continue indefinitely.
“Until the most urgent questions are answered, nothing less than a global moratorium on Covid-19 mRNA vaccines — coupled with formal, unequivocal apologies from governments and medical bodies for mandates and for silencing truth seekers — will suffice,” they write.
Dr Malhotra, an advisor to US health secretary Robert F Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Action, also serves as Chief Medical Advisor to Make Europe Healthy Again, where he campaigns for wider access to vaccine information.
In the article titled Mandates and Lack of Transparency on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety has Fuelled Distrust – An Apology to Patients is Long Overdue, the authors write that science must remain central to public health.
“The pandemic demonstrated that when scientific integrity is lacking and dissent is suppressed, unethical decision-making can become legitimised. When this happens, public confidence in health authorities erodes,” they write.
They add: “The role of public health is not to override individual clinical judgment or the ethics that govern medical decision-making. This is essential because what once appeared self-evident can, on further testing, prove false – and what may appear to be ‘safe and effective’ for one individual may be harmful to another.”
The article has been welcomed by international medical experts who say rebuilding trust in public health institutions is essential.
“It might be impossible to go back in time and correct these major public health failings, which included support of futile and damaging vaccine mandates and lockdowns and provision of unsupported false and misleading claims regarding knowledge of vaccine efficacy and safety, but to start rebuilding public confidence in health authorities (is) the starting point,” said Dr Nikolai Petrovsky, Professor of Immunology and Infectious Disease, Australian Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Institute, Adelaide.
“This article is a scholarly and timely review of the public health principles that have been so clearly ignored and traduced. Without a complete apology and explanation we are doomed to pay the price for failure to take up the few vaccines that make a highly significant contribution to public health,” added Angus Dalgleish, Emeritus Professor of Oncology, St George’s University Hospital, UK.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.