Mike Stredder, director of blood donation at NHS blood and transplant said: “It’s vital that the blood donor community reflects the diversity of the population.
“Patients in the South Asian community would have more chances of getting better matched blood and less chance of developing anti-bodies if there were more donations from South Asian donors.”
As part of its “Missing Type” campaign, which got underway this week (16), the NHS is hoping to ensure blood donation for future generations.
A survey has revealed there is currently a shortfall of South Asian blood donors in England. Last year, there was 14,043 active South Asian blood donors and 889,379 donors in total.
The number of people becoming donors and giving blood for the first time was 1,830,003 in 2005 and 1,324, 980 in 2015 – a drop of 27.6 per cent in 2015 compared to 2005.
Mohammed Beg, 35, from Greenwich, London, donates blood regularly after both his wife and twin babies received lifesaving blood transfusions.
His wife went in to early labour and suffered severe bleeding when their babies were at 27 weeks, before their bone marrow was mature enough to produce enough blood.
“I always look forward to giving blood as I hope I can make a difference in someone’s life, as somebody made a difference to my family and helped them,” said Beg.
Samta Khandhia, 38, from Rayleigh in Essex, had her life saved by 10 units of red blood cells after she lost a lot of blood when giving birth.
“I want to share my story because giving blood does save lives,” said Khandhia, who was a blood donor herself.
People from South Asian communities are more likely to have conditions such as Thalassemia (inherited blood disorder), which also mean they need regular transfusions.
Young South Asian donors are especially needed to ensure blood donations for future generations. But last year only around one in 10 (11 per cent) of blood donors were aged between 17 and 24, while more than half (54 per cent) were aged 45 and over.
A former Hertfordshire officer resigned before his misconduct ruling
‘Former Hertfordshire police officer made racist slurs against Asians'
A FORMER Hertfordshire police officer made racist comments to colleagues on multiple occasions, a misconduct panel has found.
PC Oliver Gobey, who resigned as an officer on the morning of the misconduct hearing, directed racist comments at people of Asian descent on two separate occasions.
In the first incident, he directed a “racially motivated” comment at a police sergeant to suggest they had been recruited after 9/11 because they were Asian.
Gobey was immediately challenged by PC Wallace, an “experienced officer” who had been a tutor constable for twenty years.
In a second incident, Gobey was in a police vehicle in Hitchin town centre with three colleagues. A man of Asian descent and his friends approached the officers and spoke to Wallace. The man said he was from Birmingham and asked for recommendations on places to visit.
After the man had walked away, Gobey said: “Or you have come down here to escape the honour-based violence you have caused.”Gobey was again challenged by Wallace. Gobey denied making the racist comments, but the panel concluded on the balance of probabilities that both incidents had taken place.
The panel’s report said: “They were discriminatory comments and they were his own. They were unprovoked. No one encouraged him.”
The panel also concluded that Gobey “chose to lie” about a business interest. He repeatedly failed to submit a proper application to continue part-time work for a private ambulance service and voluntary work for St John Ambulance, but continued with the latter regardless.
He also told a supervisor his business interest application had been successful, when it had not been.
In a fourth incident, Gobey “deliberately typed in random numbers” when assigned to work in the Resource Management Unit (RMU).
His figures, which were found to be wrong, came after Gobey “gave the impression to his colleagues that the work in RMY was ‘beneath’ him”.
While working there, he was heard “swearing about the work”. He was “short-tempered and ‘snappy’.” The panel’s report said: “The compilation of the figures … were far from being a simple administrative matter.
“It was essential operational information required by senior officers to decide how scarce resources would be deployed in the coming days.”
The panel found all the allegations against Gobey to be proven on the balance of probabilities, and concluded that they amounted to “serious gross misconduct” that would have led to him being sacked without notice if he had not resigned. He has also been added to the College of Policing barred list.
(Local Democracy Reporting Service)