Recipient of two National Film Awards, Bollywood actor Manoj Bajpayee is unfazed by the business of his movies. He just believes in doing his job well and moving on to the next projects. Last seen in a washout film called Missing (2018), the talented actor is now gearing up for his next Satyamev Jayate. Also starring John Abraham and debutante Aisha Sharma, the action entertainer enters screens on 15th August. Recently, our Mumbai correspondent, Mohnish Singh, met the maverick actor for a candid conversation on his new film, failure of his much-publicized espionage drama Aiyaary (2018) and much more.
How was it working with John Abraham in Satyamev Jayate?
John Abraham is a really good guy. We get along very well. It’s a nice thing when you have a great tuning with your co-stars as it makes the working experience all the better. Then you look forward to working with each other every day when you are shooting. Shooting is a tough task. If we are not getting along well, then it becomes quite torturous. But I have been quite lucky that most of the co-actors I worked with, we had a good time shooting with one other. Though with John, it was special because he comes from a very humble background. He is so rooted, so real. It makes the whole experience quite memorable.
In the last few films of yours, we have mostly seen you as an officer. Is it intentional?
You are not playing a uniform, you are playing the character. All of you are journalists, but your characters are not the same. All of you are different. All of you have something unique. I try to find the person. I try to find the character interesting. If it is interesting, what does uniform have to do with it? It is always about the character you are playing, which has to be interesting.
You usually play grey characters in films. Do they attract you more?
See, I personally feel that no human is a hero or a villain. All of us have our grey sides and that is why grey interests me because it's more human, more life-like. Nobody is a hero and nobody is a villain. If there is a good guy, there is some kind of grey area which can always be questioned and this is what I try to look for in any character. This is what I have been trying all of these years. It is a difficult choice but at the end of the day, if you are making one character very positive, that means you are doing complete injustice to that character and if you are making one character too dark, too villainous that means you are not doing justice to the character.
What film in your career is the most memorable to you?
None of my films has given me the recognition that Satya (1998) had given me. After Satya, my only focus is the kind of films I want to do and not be tempted by the money that I was offered. I am so happy that later on because of my choices, space was created for many actors and they were recognized for their works.
Many tried to recreate films like Satya, but no one could ever do so. Why do you think they failed?
The film that has happened, it has happened. If you ask me, nobody can make Deewaar (1975). Deewaar is Deewaar. The film that has gained cult status, you can only copy it. You cannot create the same magic. You can’t create the same magic because when that original was made, the situation was completely different. When Satya was made, people couldn’t imagine that these types of characters will be written or performances can happen this way. So, those films, all the actors, that storytelling, the music, everything is something that was not happening during that time.
Would you ever like to do a biopic film again?
I would like to do a biopic of Aligarh (2016) kind or Budhia Singh (2016) kind, you know, talking about common people because they are my heroes. They go through the struggle and grind and they go through it every day. They are managing their lives. They are educating their children, surviving this difficult world. I would love to associate myself with those kinds of people.
Is there any kind of character that you would want to play or you have been wanting to play?
No there is nothing like that. What I thought, it happened. I did it all. Right now, I am looking for new directors, new kind of storytelling, and a script that hasn’t yet been made in India. That is something only a new director can bring. The old directors could not do that. A new director which has a hunger in him can do it. He will have a one of a kind script and I am looking for that.
Aiyaary did not do so well at the box office, but your acting was praised in all the reviews. How does that make you feel?
Aiyaary has been mistreated. Aiyaary is a great film and I am very proud of that film and it is one of the best performances of my life and one of the best works I took up. I think it is a superlative film and I am very happy with my performance in it. Whether a film doing well or not doing well is concerned, you are talking to an actor whose most of the films are flops and after 24 years, I am still here talking to you about my next film. So, my existence in this industry, my career proves that you just have to focus on your work and do a good job and you will be here whether your films make ₹100 crore or not, it does not matter.
Do you think as an actor the freedom of speech and expression has been hindered by the politics in filmmaking?
There is no politics. Politicians are only encouraged by these fringe communities. Like, an organisation has been made and to make it famous and themselves famous either I can do some good work and let the society know about what we can help with or I’ll start throwing stones at anybody who is passing by or at anything which is already famous like a celebrity. When a stone is thrown at somebody or something which is already celebrated, people will talk about it, an easy way to stardom. Then the politicians use that to gain popularity. It’s a chain, they feed off each other and we are the victims. Creativity is something that has always been hampered. It has always faced obstacles and yet creativity moves over and keeps moving on.
Bella Thorne accuses Charlie Puth of sparking a ‘hate train’ after she turned him down.
She claims he publicly misled fans about their brief romance in 2016.
Puth had previously implied she cheated on her ex Tyler Posey with him.
Thorne is now engaged to Mark Emms; Puth married Brooke Sansone in 2024.
Actor Bella Thorne has reignited a years-old controversy with singer Charlie Puth, accusing him of turning public opinion against her in 2016 after she refused to sleep with him. The former Disney star made the claims in an Instagram comment responding to singer Jade Thirlwall’s recent remarks about never wanting to work with Puth.
Actress Bella Thorne and Charlie Puth attend the Y100's Jingle Ball 2016Getty Images
Bella Thorne calls out Charlie Puth over 2016 romance
The drama resurfaced after a fan account posted a quote from Jade Thirlwall, formerly of Little Mix, saying she would “never collaborate” with Charlie Puth. Bella Thorne commented on the post, “Yeah, I mean... he lied to the entire world about me and started a hate train. All because I wouldn’t... do the deed with him.”
Thorne and Puth were briefly linked in late 2016 following her breakup with Teen Wolf actor Tyler Posey. The pair were spotted together at Miami’s Jingle Ball that December and were photographed kissing. Puth even serenaded her on stage, but things quickly turned messy.
Bella Thorne's commentInstagram Screengrab
Puth accused Thorne of being dishonest about her breakup
Soon after their public outings, Puth posted a series of now-deleted tweets implying that Thorne had not been truthful about ending her previous relationship before seeing him. Though he didn’t name her directly, he issued an apology to Posey, stating, “She told me she was not with him anymore. This is all news to me.” In another tweet, he added, “No one should have their heart messed with like this, and I’m not going to be in the middle of it.”
These posts sparked widespread online criticism of Thorne, who at the time quickly denied the accusations. She clarified on X that she had already broken up with Posey “like over two weeks” before and was not in a relationship with Puth either. She claimed he had seen an outdated article and jumped to conclusions instead of contacting her directly.
Charlie Puth performs onstage at an interactive global eConcert liveGetty Images
Thorne later shared her side of the story on radio
Speaking on The Jenny McCarthy Show in 2017, Thorne described her split with Posey as one of the hardest breakups she’d gone through. She said Charlie had reached out via social media, and they went out a couple of times. She described him as “super talented” and said she was impressed by his talent.
Recalling the Jingle Ball appearance, Thorne explained that she accepted his invite as friends, but the fallout came after Puth saw an old article about her and Posey. “He didn’t even look at the date,” she said. “Instead of texting me and asking about it, he posted it on Twitter.”
Bella Thorne and Mark Emms attend a red carpet for the movie "Priscilla"Getty Images
Both have moved on, but tensions linger
Since the short-lived scandal, both stars have gone their separate ways. Thorne got engaged to film producer Mark Emms in 2023, sharing their relationship with fans on Instagram. Puth, meanwhile, married his longtime friend Brooke Sansone in September 2024.
Charlie Puth and Brooke Sansone attend the 10th Breakthrough Prize CeremonyGetty Images
Though neither publicly addressed the incident again until now, Thorne’s recent comment suggests that the events of 2016 left a deeper mark than previously thought. The renewed attention on Puth’s past behaviour also sheds new light on Jade Thirlwall’s remarks, with fans now speculating that more industry figures may have experienced similar run-ins.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Kendrick Lamar and SZA thrill Birmingham crowd with high-energy Grand National Tour show
Kendrick Lamar and SZA brought their record-breaking Grand National Tour to Birmingham’s Villa Park on Thursday night.
The three-hour set featured solo performances, visual spectacles, and crowd-favourite duets like All the Stars and Gloria.
Kendrick arrived on stage in his signature GNX, delivering fiery performances from To Pimp a Butterfly, DAMN., and his latest album GNX.
SZA stunned with hits from CTRL and SOS, transforming the stage into a fantasy landscape with high-energy vocals and choreography.
Two of the biggest names in rap and R&B, Kendrick Lamar and SZA, brought their much-anticipated Grand National Tour to Birmingham’s Villa Park on Thursday night, turning the historic stadium into a special musical experience. The pair, who previously wowed the world during this year’s Super Bowl halftime show, performed a mix of solo tracks and duets across a three-hour set that left fans exhilarated.
The Grand National Tour, which has already broken records as the highest-grossing co-headline tour in history, continued its momentum in the UK. Following performances in Glasgow, Kendrick and SZA proved once again why they remain at the forefront of global music.
Kendrick Lamar and SZA commands the stage at Villa Park during his explosive opening setInstagram/grandnationaltour
Lamar kicks off with raw energy and lyrical precision
Kendrick Lamar opened the show with Wacced Out Murals, emerging in a black Buick GNX, the same car featured on the cover of his latest album. From the first beat, he commanded the crowd with his sharp delivery and intense presence. Tracks like King Kunta, Element, and DNA sent waves of energy through the crowd, while his Grammy-winning Drake diss Not Like Us received one of the loudest receptions of the night.
Even with rapid-fire verses and complex lyricism, Lamar’s performance never faltered. The audience often struggled to keep pace with his delivery, but the enthusiasm never waned. His storytelling, stage presence, and the layered visuals, many in stark black and white, set a powerful tone.
After Kendrick’s solo set, SZA joined the stage with *30 for 30*, marking the first of many seamless transitions between the two artists. Dressed in flowing ensembles that matched her dreamlike set design, complete with vines, dancers in insect-like costumes, and even a pair of wings for Nobody Gets Me, she took fans through her evolving discography.
From older favourites like Love Galore and Broken Clocks to newer tracks off SOS Deluxe like Scorsese Baby Daddy and Kitchen, SZA showcased her growth as a performer. Her vocals were pitch-perfect, even when altered from the studio versions, and her choreography added a new layer to her emotive style.
The moments where Kendrick and SZA shared the stage proved the most unforgettable. Their rendition of All the Stars, performed on rising platforms against a golden sunset, felt almost cinematic. Fans roared as Kendrick asked, “You feeling the energy?” and SZA followed up with, “You feeling the love?”
Later, the pair closed with Luther and Gloria, the latter acting as a fitting tribute to their mutual respect as artists and collaborators. While some audience members left early to beat the traffic, those who stayed were rewarded with a moving finale.
Logistics, crowd vibes, and the Villa Park experience
Doors opened at 4:30 pm, with support from DJ Mustard warming up the crowd under the July sun. Roads around the venue were closed off, and fans were advised to take public transport or shuttle services due to limited parking. Security was tight, with bag checks and restrictions on items like food, drink, and umbrellas.
Despite some sound quality issues and occasional sightline problems due to the stage layout, the energy in the stadium never dropped. The crowd, a mix of longtime fans and younger newcomers, remained vocal and engaged throughout.
Keep ReadingShow less
Kapil Sharma’s Canada cafe shot at days after opening
Shots were fired at Kap’s Café in Surrey, Canada, owned by comedian Kapil Sharma, just days after its opening.
Khalistani extremist Harjit Singh Laddi, linked to banned group BKI, claimed responsibility.
The motive cited was an old comedy segment from The Kapil Sharma Show that allegedly mocked Nihang Sikhs.
No injuries were reported; Canadian authorities are investigating the incident.
Comedian Kapil Sharma’s recently launched Kap’s Café in Surrey, British Columbia, was the target of a shooting in the early hours of 10 July. Though no one was harmed, the property sustained significant damage. A known Khalistani extremist, Harjit Singh Laddi, has claimed responsibility for the attack, citing perceived religious disrespect on The Kapil Sharma Show.
Kap’s Cafe in Surrey was struck by gunfire late at night with staff still insideInstagram/thekapscafe_
Shooter linked to Khalistani group Babbar Khalsa International
Harjit Singh Laddi, a wanted terrorist on India’s National Investigation Agency (NIA) list, said he and another operative, Toofan Singh, were behind the shooting. Laddi is associated with the banned organisation Babbar Khalsa International (BKI), which the Canadian government recognises as a terrorist group.
In a social media statement, Laddi said the attack was a reaction to a past comedy sketch where a character wore traditional Nihang Sikh attire while delivering humorous lines. “These were considered offensive and hurt religious sentiments,” he wrote. “No spiritual identity should be ridiculed under the pretext of comedy.”
Laddi also claimed the Sikh community had reached out to Sharma’s team seeking an apology but received no response.
Kaps Cafe Instagram Story Instagram Screengrab/thekapscafe_
Café issues emotional statement, vows to stay open
Kap’s Café, operated by Sharma’s wife Ginni Chatrath, had only opened on 4 July. Following the attack, the café released a statement on Instagram expressing heartbreak over the violence but reinforced their commitment to the community.
“We opened Kap’s Café with hopes of bringing warmth, community, and joy through delicious coffee and friendly conversation. To have violence intersect with that dream is heartbreaking,” read the post. “We are processing this shock, but we are not giving up.” The message ended with a note of gratitude to supporters and a promise to continue operating: “Let’s stand firm against violence and ensure Kap’s Café remains a place of warmth and community… see you soon, under better skies.”
Kaps Cafe Instagram Story Instagram Screengrab/thekapscafe_
According to Surrey Police, officers responded to reports of gunfire at the 8400 block of 120 Street around 1:50 am on July 10. Bullet damage was found on the cafe’s exterior while staff were still inside. No injuries were reported.
While no arrests have been made, Khalistani extremist Harjit Singh Laddi publicly claimed responsibility for the shooting in a social media post. Police have not officially confirmed his involvement. Authorities continue to investigate potential links to terrorism, organised crime, or extortion, and are also examining whether this incident may be connected to other recent threats involving Indian-origin individuals in Canada.
The shooting comes amid already strained relations between India and Canada over Khalistani separatist activities. In 2023, the killing of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Surrey led to diplomatic fallout after Canada alleged Indian involvement.
Harjit Singh Laddi, believed to be residing in Germany, is accused of masterminding multiple violent acts in Punjab, including the April 2024 killing of VHP leader Vikas Prabhakar. Indian authorities have placed a reward of £8,630 (₹10 lakh) for information leading to his arrest.
Keep ReadingShow less
Chandran wore lambskin shorts and a green cashmere sweater for her Wimbledon appearance
Charithra Chandran attended Wimbledon as a Ralph Lauren ambassador, turning heads in a vintage-inspired ensemble.
Her look echoed Bridgerton character Edwina Sharma, with soft curls and a classic summer palette.
Fans online praised her poise and outfit, with many saying she outshone stars like Andrew Garfield.
The actress wore a green cashmere sweater, tailored lambskin shorts and white Nappa pumps.
Charithra Chandran’s Wimbledon appearance might have been behind Hollywood stars Andrew Garfield and Monica Barbaro, but her crisp summer ensemble made sure all eyes found her. Dressed head-to-toe in Ralph Lauren, the British-Indian actress brought understated elegance and old-school charm to Centre Court, and social media took notice.
Charithra Chandran styled her hair in soft curls for the Ralph Lauren outfitInstagram/charithra17/
A Ralph Lauren moment with a Bridgerton nod
Charithra arrived at Wimbledon 2025 in a look that paid homage to her Bridgerton roots while firmly placing her among fashion’s rising stars. Wearing a sleeveless green cashmere sweater layered over a crisp white shirt, she paired the look with tan lambskin shorts and sleek white Nappa pumps, giving preppy summer chic a polished, modern upgrade.
She styled her hair in soft vintage curls, writing on TikTok that her look was “Edwina inspired,” referencing her breakout role in the hit Netflix period drama. She later posted the outfit on Instagram, captioning it, “Repping @wimbledon green with @ralphlauren. Wouldn’t be summer without it.” The post quickly gained traction, with fans and fashion watchers alike praising her effortless charm.
— (@)
Fans say she 'stole the spotlight' from Hollywood A-listers
While Andrew Garfield and Monica Barbaro were seated directly in front of her, and even made headlines for their courtside chemistry, many online noted that Chandran quietly stole the moment. One user tweeted, “Charithra Chandran is so beautiful, I didn’t even notice Andrew Garfield.” Another added, “Serving face, grace and Wimbledon-worthy class.”
Reddit threads lit up with praise for her presence and look, with several fans highlighting how refreshing it was to see a dark-skinned South Asian woman at the centre of attention at such a high-profile event. The comments ranged from “She should be a Disney princess” to “That’s the definition of quiet luxury.”
Style with substance: why Chandran’s fashion matters
Chandran’s choice to embrace a look so rooted in vintage elegance and British tailoring also mirrors her own journey. She is an Oxford graduate who brings intelligence, poise, and presence both on-screen and off. As a brand ambassador for Ralph Lauren, she has consistently delivered looks that nod to heritage while adding her own contemporary vibe to it.
In a media landscape that still underrepresents South Asian women in luxury fashion spaces, Chandran’s presence at Wimbledon in a leading designer’s box, and in their outfit, felt quietly radical. She wasn’t just there; she belonged there.
Charithra’s look was inspired by her character Edwina Sharma from BridgertonInstagram/charithra17/
From Bridgerton to fashion’s front row
While Charithra Chandran is best known for playing Edwina Sharma in Bridgerton Season 2, she’s no stranger to reinvention. Recent credits include Dune: Prophecy and the upcoming season of One Piece, where she plays Nefertari Vivi. Off-screen, she’s rapidly becoming a name to watch in the fashion world, with red carpet looks that bring together tradition and trend with striking ease.
Whether she’s portraying a royal on screen or sitting in the royal box in real life, Chandran’s presence is part of a larger shift towards a more diverse, intelligent, and graceful representation in both fashion and film.
Keep ReadingShow less
Poster of the upcoming Superman film releasing on July 11
James Gunn’s Superman reimagines the hero as a symbol of the immigrant experience.
Former Superman actor Dean Cain and conservative commentators criticise the film as "too woke."
Cain argues that Hollywood is rewriting classic characters to fit modern political agendas.
Gunn defends his interpretation, saying the story champions kindness and inclusion.
James Gunn’s highly anticipated Superman has already been caught in a political storm. The director’s depiction of the Man of Steel as a metaphor for the immigrant experience has drawn criticism from right-wing voices, who accuse Hollywood of turning the iconic superhero into a tool for political messaging.
New ‘Superman’ movie sparks backlash for portraying hero as immigrant symbol Instagram/superman/reald3d
Gunn calls Superman ‘The story of America’
In a recent interview, Gunn described Superman as an immigrant who “came from other places and populated the country,” framing the nearly century-old comic book hero as a symbol of the American melting pot. The new film, he added, is about “basic human kindness”, a value he believes is being lost in today’s culture. For Gunn, this fresh take is less about politics and more about restoring a sense of empathy.
Director James Gunn attends the red carpet for the Superman movie premiereGetty Images
Dean Cain says Superman is becoming too political
Dean Cain, who portrayed Superman in the ’90s TV series Lois & Clark, sees things differently. In a video interview, Cain accused Hollywood of going too far with “woke” reinterpretations of legacy characters. While acknowledging Superman’s extraterrestrial roots, he warned that reshaping classic icons to reflect modern ideologies risks diluting their core values.
“The ‘American way’ is immigrant friendly, tremendously so,” Cain said, “but there are rules.” He cautioned against celebrating immigration without acknowledging its complexities, arguing that unlimited inclusion could lead to societal collapse.
Dean Cain accused Hollywood of going too far with “woke” reinterpretationsGetty Images
Right-wing backlash gains momentum
Cain isn’t alone in his criticism. Fox News host Jesse Watters mockingly suggested that the new Superman now stands for “truth, justice, and your preferred pronouns,” while other conservative voices took issue with the film’s social messaging. Some have gone as far as to claim the hero’s cape should bear gang symbols if he’s being used to push a political narrative.
The reaction highlights how even fictional characters can become lightning rods in America’s ongoing culture wars. Immigration, especially, remains a divisive topic, intensified by recent enforcement policies and rising anti-immigrant rhetoric under Donald Trump’s influence.
While critics decry the film as ideological, those involved in Superman are standing firm. Nathan Fillion, who plays Green Lantern in the movie, downplayed the outrage, saying, “It’s just a movie.”
Sean Gunn, the director’s brother and a cast member in the film, offered a more forceful defence: “Yes, Superman is an immigrant. If you don’t like that, you’re not American.” For the cast and creators, the backlash isn’t a deterrent. In fact, it’s proof that the story still resonates and provokes thought.
Gunn’s Superman releases internationally this week and hits U.S. theatres on Friday, 11 July. Despite the controversy, early reviews are favourable, with many praising its emotional core and even the updated relevance.
But as the debate rages on, one thing is clear: this version of Superman isn’t just about capes and villains, it’s about what it means to belong in a country still struggling with the question of who gets to call it home.