THE conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir has presented China with a rare chance to gather valuable intelligence, as it monitors Pakistan’s use of Chinese-made jets and weapons in live combat with India.
Security analysts and diplomats said China’s military modernisation has reached a point where it can deeply scrutinise Indian actions in real time from its border installations and Indian Ocean fleets as well as from space.
“From an intelligence perspective, this is a rare target of opportunity right on China’s borders involving a key potential adversary,” said Singapore-based security analyst Alexander Neill.
Two US officials claimed a Chinesemade J-10 Pakistani jet fighter shot down at least two Indian military planes – one of them a French-made Rafale fighter. India has not acknowledged the loss of any of its planes, while Pakistan’s defence and foreign ministers have confirmed the use of J-10 aircraft, but not commented on which missiles or other weapons were used.
The aerial clash is a rare opportunity for militaries around the world to study the performance of pilots, fighter jets and air-to-air missiles in active combat, and use that knowledge to prepare their own air forces for battle.
Security analysts said both India and China have taken steps to strengthen their military facilities and capabilities along the border, but it is also from above that China packs an intelligence gathering punch.
The London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) noted that China now fields 267 satellites – including 115 devoted to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and a further 81 that monitor military electronic and signals information. It is a network that dwarfs its regional neighbours, including India, and is second only to the US.
“Both in terms of space and missile tracking capabilities, China is much better off now in terms of being able to monitor things as they happen,” said Neill, who is an adjunct fellow at Hawaii’s Pacific Forum thinktank.
China’s defence ministry did not respond to questions about its satellite deployment or intelligence activities.
Pakistan’s military media wing and information minister did not immediately respond to a request for comment on any information sharing with China.
Pakistan previously said it has an “allweather strategic, cooperative partnership” with China.
India has not commented on the issue, but its High Commissioner in London, Vikram Doraiswami, told Sky News that China’s relationship with Pakistan was not a concern for India.
“China requires a relationship with all of its neighbours, that includes us,” he said.
Chinese military intelligence teams would be eager to garner information on any Indian use of air defences and launches of cruise and ballistic missiles – not just in terms of flight paths and accuracy, but command and control information, analysts and diplomats said.
Any deployment of India’s BrahMos supersonic cruise missile – a weapon it developed jointly with Russia – would be of particular interest, some analysts said, given they do not believe it has been used in combat.
Chinese-made J-10 fighter jets used by Pakistan
China has also beefed up its intelligence gathering at sea. It has been increasingly active in the Indian Ocean in recent years, with China deploying space tracking ships as well as oceanographic research and fishing vessels on extended deployments, open source intelligence trackers said.
Regional diplomats said while the Chinese navy has been relatively cautious about extensive warship deployments into the Indian Ocean, still lacking a broad network of bases, it actively seeks intelligence with these other vessels.
Over the past week, some trackers noted unusually large fleets of Chinese fishing vessels moving apparently in unison to within 120 nautical miles of Indian naval drills in the Arabian Sea as tensions rose with Pakistan.
Pentagon reports on China’s military modernisation and analysts note that China’s fishing fleets routinely perform a coordinated militia function that plays an important intelligence gathering role. “These vessels may double up as listening posts, tracking development rhythms and response patterns, feeding early warning, naval intel to their sponsors,” wrote open source tracker Damien Symon in an X post that highlighted the deployment of 224 Chinese vessels near Indian naval exercises on May 1.
Chinese officials do not usually acknowledge the existence of fishing militia or intelligence work carried out by other nominally civilian vessels.
Given its close ties with Pakistan, Beijing is likely to exploit its network of envoys and military teams to gather intelligence.
“The presence of Chinese military advisers and other personnel in Pakistan is well-known given how Pakistan’s Ministry of Defence has been importing some of its most advanced military hardware from China, so we can be certain the PLA would be able to access relevant data,” said James Char, a Chinese security scholar at Singapore’s S Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
INDIA and Pakistan have stepped back from the brink of all-out war, with an apparent nudge from the US, but New Delhi’s aspirations as a global diplomatic power now face a key test after US president Donald Trump offered to mediate over Kashmir, analysts said.
India’s rapid rise as the world’s fifth-largest economy has boosted its confidence and clout on the world stage, where it has played an important role in addressing regional crises such as Sri Lanka’s economic collapse and the Myanmar earthquake.
But the conflict with Pakistan over Kashmir, touches a sensitive nerve in Indian politics.
How India threads the diplomatic needle – courting favour with Trump over issues like trade while asserting its own interests in Kashmir – will depend in large part on domestic politics and could determine the prospects for peace in the region.
“India ... is likely not keen on the broader talks (that the ceasefire) calls for. Upholding it will pose challenges,” said Michael Kugelman, a south Asia analyst based in Washington.
In a sign of just how fragile the truce remains, the two governments accused each other of serious violations last Saturday (10).
The ceasefire, Kugelman noted, was “cobbled together hastily” when tensions were at their peak.
Trump said last Sunday (11) that, following the ceasefire, “I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great nations”.
India considers Kashmir an integral part of its territory and not open for negotiation, least of all through a third-party mediator.
“By agreeing to abort under US persuasion ... just three days of military operations, India is drawing attention to the Kashmir dispute, not to Pakistan’s crossborder terrorism that triggered the crisis,” said Brahma Chellaney, an Indian defence analyst.
For decades after the two countries separated in 1947, the West largely saw India and Pakistan through the same lens as the neighbours fought regularly over Kashmir. That changed in recent years, partly thanks to India’s economic rise, while Pakistan languished with an economy less than one-tenth India’s size.
But Trump’s proposal to work towards a solution to Kashmir, along with US secretary of state Marco Rubio’s declaration that India and Pakistan would start talks on broader issues at a neutral site, has irked many Indians.
Pakistan welcomed Trump’s offer, while Delhi denied any third-party role in the ceasefire, saying it was a bilateral decision.
Analysts and Indian opposition parties are questioning whether New Delhi met its strategic objectives by launching missiles into Pakistan last week.
By launching missiles deep into Pakistan, Modi showed a much higher appetite for risk than his predecessors. But the sudden ceasefire exposed him to rare criticism at home.
Swapan Dasgupta, a former MP from Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, said the ceasefire had not gone down well in India partly because “Trump suddenly appeared out of nowhere and pronounced his verdict”.
The main opposition Congress party got in on the act, demanding an explanation from the government on the “ceasefire announcements made from Washington, DC.” “Have we opened the doors to third-party mediation?” asked Congress spokesperson Jairam Ramesh.
And while the fighting has stopped, tensions persist with several flashpoints in the fragile relationship that will test India’s resolve and may tempt it to adopt a hard-line stance. The top concern for Pakistan, diplomats and government officials there said, would be the Indus Waters Treaty, which India suspended last month, but which remains a vital source of water for many of Pakistan’s farms, households, and hydropower plants.
“Pakistan would not have agreed (to a ceasefire) without US guarantees of a broader dialogue,” said Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, a former foreign minister and currently chairman of the People’s Party of Pakistan, which supports the government.
Moeed Yusuf, former Pakistan National Security Advisor, said a broad agreement would be needed to break the cycle of brinksmanship over Kashmir.
“Because the underlying issues remain, and every six months, one year, two years, three years, something like this happens and then you are back at the brink of war in a nuclear environment,” he said.
FILE PHOTO: Indian Army soldiers stand next to a M777 Ultra Lightweight Howitzer positioned at Penga Teng Tso ahead of Tawang, near the Line of Actual Control (LAC), neighbouring China, in Arunachal Pradesh. (Photo by MONEY SHARMA/AFP via Getty Images)
INDIA on Wednesday (14) dismissed China’s renaming of at least 27 places in Arunachal Pradesh as a “vain and preposterous” exercise, and underlined that the northeastern state is an “integral and inalienable” part of India. Beijing, however, said it is within its “sovereign” right to rename parts of the Indian state.
“We have noticed that China has persisted with its vain and preposterous attempts to name places in the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh. Consistent with our principled position, we reject such attempts categorically. Creative naming will not alter the undeniable reality that Arunachal Pradesh was, is, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India,” Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in response to media queries.
In response to India’s statement, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ spokesperson Lin Jian told a press conference in Beijing that they have “standardised names of some parts of Zangnan (Arunachal Pradesh)” which is “part of China’s territory”.
China on Sunday (11) notified the ‘renaming’ of at least 27 places as it continues to make a territorial claim over India’s northeastern state. China refers to Arunachal Pradesh as Zangnan or southern Tibet.
This is the fifth time in the last eight years that Beijing has announced the rechristening of places in Arunachal Pradesh.
Its first attempt was in 2017, followed by those in 2021, 2023 and 2024. India has consistently rejected such Chinese attempts. Last year, Beijing also protested against prime minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the Indian state to inaugurate the Sela tunnel, which provides all-weather connectivity to the strategically important town of Tawang.
Just as Modi was visiting the state, the Chinese foreign and defence ministries published a series of statements over Beijing’s claims on Arunachal Pradesh. In early March 2024, the US also opposed any Chinese attempt to unilaterally advance its territorial claim over the northeastern state.
The latest notification came a day after India and Pakistan announced a bilateral understanding to cease armed hostilities. Between May 7 and 10, their armed forces carried out kinetic action against each other. Last Wednesday (7), India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting nine terrorist complexes across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. China referred to the operation as “regrettable”.
India’s Operation Sindoor was a response to the April 22 terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam which left 26 people dead. India’s national security advisor Ajit Doval had spoken to his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on Operation Sindoor, with the two holding a round of phone calls on Saturday (10).
A day after Doval and Wang spoke, China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs published its latest list of renamed areas in Arunachal Pradesh. Towards the end of last year, China also announced the construction of a mega-dam on the Yarlung-Zangbo River.
The Yarlung-Zangbo River flows through Arunachal Pradesh as the Siang River before it becomes the Brahmaputra and flows into the Bay of Bengal. The Chinese dam has serious implications for the flow of water through Arunachal Pradesh.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
'Purnam Kumar Shaw, who had been in the custody of Pakistan Rangers since 23 April 2025, was handed over to India,' the BSF said in a statement.
PAKISTAN on Wednesday returned a Border Security Force (BSF) soldier, an Indian border guard, who had been captured a day after an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir in April that killed 26 people.
The attack took place near the town of Pahalgam on 22 April and led to four days of fighting between India and Pakistan. A ceasefire was announced on Saturday.
“Purnam Kumar Shaw, who had been in the custody of Pakistan Rangers since 23 April 2025, was handed over to India,” the BSF said in a statement.
The handover was “conducted peacefully and in accordance with established protocols,” the statement added.
No group claimed responsibility for the 22 April attack. India blamed Pakistan for supporting the attackers, leading to strong statements and diplomatic actions from both sides. Pakistan rejected the accusations and called for an independent investigation.
Pakistan said on Tuesday it remains committed to the ceasefire but warned it would respond to any future aggression.
The statement came after Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s address on Monday, in which he said India would strike “terrorist hideouts” across the border again if there were fresh attacks, and would not be deterred by “nuclear blackmail”.
Both countries used missiles and drones to target each other’s military installations after India said it had hit “terrorist infrastructure” in Pakistan and Pakistani-administered Kashmir on Wednesday. The strikes were in response to the 22 April attack in which 26 Hindu tourists were killed.
BANGLADESH’s Election Commission has suspended the registration of the Awami League, the party led by former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, effectively disqualifying it from contesting upcoming national elections.
The decision followed a government order banning all activities of the Awami League under the Anti-Terrorism Act. The interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, issued the ban after days of protests.
Authorities cited national security concerns and an ongoing war crimes investigation against the party’s top leaders over the deaths of hundreds of protesters.
“With the home ministry’s ban on all activities of the Awami League and its affiliated organisations, the Election Commission has decided to suspend the party’s registration,” Election Commission Secretary Akhtar Ahmed told reporters late on Monday.
Under Bangladesh’s electoral laws, a party must be registered with the Election Commission to take part in national polls. The suspension prevents the Awami League from contesting elections unless the ban is lifted and its registration reinstated.
The Election Commission has also barred the party and its affiliates from any political activity. This includes media or online appearances, publications, processions, rallies, or conferences, until the International Crimes Tribunal completes its investigation.
Hasina won a fourth consecutive term in 2024. The election was boycotted by the main opposition, whose leaders were either jailed or in exile. She has been credited with economic progress, but also faced allegations of human rights abuses and crackdowns on dissent.
Protests escalated in recent months, leading to Hasina fleeing to India in August 2024. Yunus took over as head of the interim government.
Yunus has said he does not intend to run in elections and that national polls may be delayed until 2026. He has promised reforms before any vote.
India expressed concern on Tuesday over the ban on the Awami League and the political situation in Bangladesh.
“We strongly support the early holding of free, fair and inclusive elections in Bangladesh,” Indian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at a media briefing.
Former prime minister Khaleda Zia’s Bangladesh Nationalist Party has also called for early elections and a return to democratic rule.
The newly formed National Citizen Party, led by students from the protest movement that brought down Hasina’s government, has demanded that polls be held only after reforms.
The unrest began in July with student protests against public sector job quotas. It later turned into one of the most violent political periods since Bangladesh’s independence in 1971.
The Awami League has faced increasing criticism in recent years over allegations of authoritarianism, corruption, and rights violations during Hasina’s leadership.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Foreign secretary David Lammy said he hoped the ceasefire would be sustained and called for dialogue between the two sides. (Photo: Getty Images)
The UK on Saturday (10) welcomed the ceasefire agreedbetween India and Pakistan and urged both countries to continue steps towards de-escalation.
Foreign secretary David Lammy said he hoped the ceasefire would be sustained and called for dialogue between the two sides.
“Today’s ceasefire between India and Pakistan is hugely welcome. I urge both parties to sustain this. De-escalation is in everybody’s interest,” Lammy said.
The ceasefire was announced late Saturday by US president Donald Trump after fighting that killed at least 60 people and displaced thousands.
The escalation began before dawn on Wednesday when India launched missile attacks it said destroyed “terrorist camps” in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The strikes followed an April 22 attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 civilians. India blamed Pakistan for the attack, while Islamabad denied involvement and responded with artillery fire.
Lammy said he had chaired a COBRA meeting on the situation and that the top priority was maintaining the ceasefire.
“I know the images from India and Pakistan have been deeply worrying for many communities here in Britain, and for those living and working in both countries,” he said.
“Given our strong and close relationships with India and Pakistan, the UK stands ready to work with both sides to make lasting peace a reality.”
He said he had spoken to India’s external affairs minister S Jaishankar and Pakistan’s deputy prime minister and foreign minister Ishaq Dar.
“My message to both was the same: ensure this ceasefire agreement is extended and sustained. Further conflict is in nobody’s interest,” he said.
Lammy also said the UK was working with the US, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and EU counterparts to support peace, and Foreign Office teams were in touch with airlines and advising British nationals in the region.
“We value the contribution of British Pakistani and British Indian communities to this country, and their long and proud history of living here side by side,” he said.