PRIME MINISTER Boris Johnson on Tuesday (19) apologised to MPs after he became the first British leader fined for breaking the law, but faced opposition calls to quit for the sake of integrity in politics.
Addressing parliament for the first time since the April 12 fine, he reiterated that he did not think he had done anything wrong when he attended an office gathering for his birthday in June 2020, when Britain was under a pandemic lockdown.
"That was my mistake and I apologise for it unreservedly," he said.
The British public "had a right to expect better of their prime minister", Johnson added, while insisting he would get on with the job including to defend Ukraine against Russia's "barbaric" invasion.
Meanwhile, opposition Labour leader Keir Starmer called the prime minister “a man without shame” during furious exchanges in parliament as MPs prepared to vote on whether Johnson should be investigated for lying about the Partygate scandal.
Starmer said there was cross-party support towards Britain's backing for Ukraine, and any Conservative successor would continue Johnson's war policy.
He recounted the experience of one member of the public who, because of the Covid rules then in place, was denied the chance to hold his dying wife's hand in hospital.
Johnson was "a man without shame" backed by "nodding dogs" in his cabinet, Starmer said, urging Conservative MPs to eject their leader.
They should "bring decency, honesty and integrity back into our politics and stop the denigration of this country", the Labour leader said.
Johnson could yet receive further fines over various Downing Street parties held despite strict coronavirus lockdowns imposed by his own government over the past two years.
MPs will hold a special debate on Thursday (21) into whether he misled the House of Commons when, in December, he denied ever breaking the rules. He will be on an official visit to India by then.
Knowingly misleading parliament is a breach of government ministers' code of conduct, which states they should resign as a result -- and opposition lawmakers are adamant he should go.
But asked directly if he deliberately misled parliament, Johnson emphatically replied: "No."
British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson departs No.10 Downing street for the Houses of Parliament on April 19, 2022 in London, England. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Survey result 'negative' for Johnson
One national survey suggested around two-thirds of the public spoke negatively about Johnson, compared to just 16 per cent positively, with the word "liar" the most commonly shared response.
"Overall, 'partygate' dominates views of Boris over Ukraine," said James Johnson, a Conservative pollster who conducted the sample.
"Fury has not receded. Many negative comments are by people who liked him previously but have now changed their minds."
Voters will get their chance to deliver a verdict on May 5, when the UK holds nationwide elections for local and city councils.
A drubbing for the Conservatives then could sharpen the debate among his own MPs, some of whom have said that now is not the time to change leader given the war in Ukraine.
David Wolfson, a justice minister, has already resigned from the government, citing "the scale, context and nature" of the rule breaches. Reports said that Johnson will seek support of backbenchers.
But one senior Tory backbencher, Mark Harper, responded to Johnson in the Commons that he was "no longer... worthy" of being prime minister after his apology.
Dozens of alleged lockdown breaches
London's Metropolitan Police is investigating dozens of alleged lockdown breaches by Johnson and his staff in the Downing Street complex where he lives and works. It said last week officers had so far issued more than 50 fines.
The scandal, the latest in a stream of controversies to hit Johnson since last year, left his position hanging by a thread and MPs from his Conservative Party in a rebellious mood.
But he boosted his survival chances with what is seen as a firm response to Ukraine, which diverted attention away from the furore when he was most vulnerable in February.
Britain's cost-of-living crisis is also credited with distracting people from the scandal, while Johnson has made several big policy announcements aimed at his pro-Brexit political base.
They include controversial plans to send migrants and asylum seekers who cross the Channel thousands of miles away to Rwanda.
INDIAN astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla and three other crew members were launched into space early on Wednesday aboard the Axiom-4 mission. The crew lifted off from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, at around 2:30 am EDT (0630 GMT), marking the latest commercial mission organised by Axiom Space in collaboration with SpaceX.
The mission is carrying astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary to the International Space Station (ISS) for the first time. The launch was carried out using a SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule, named “Grace” by the Axiom crew, mounted on a two-stage Falcon 9 rocket.
Live footage showed the spacecraft rising into the night sky over Florida’s Atlantic coast with a trail of exhaust. Cameras inside the capsule showed the astronauts seated in their pressurised cabin during ascent.
“We’ve had an incredible ride uphill,” mission commander Peggy Whitson said over the radio to SpaceX mission control near Los Angeles, shortly after the upper stage placed the capsule into preliminary orbit.
First Indian astronaut to reach ISS
Shubhanshu Shukla, 39, an Indian Air Force pilot, is now the first astronaut from India to travel to the ISS. This comes 41 years after Rakesh Sharma’s eight-day mission aboard the Soviet Union’s Salyut-7 space station in 1984.
Shukla’s participation is seen as a precursor to India’s upcoming Gaganyaan crewed spaceflight, expected in 2027. His mission is also part of the growing collaboration between NASA and ISRO.
The other crew members include 65-year-old Whitson, a retired NASA astronaut now working with Axiom, Slawosz Uznański-Wiśniewski of Poland, and Tibor Kapu of Hungary. This marks Whitson’s fifth spaceflight.
Two weeks aboard the space station
The Crew Dragon spacecraft is expected to reach the ISS after about 28 hours of flight. Docking with the space station is planned for Thursday morning. Once aboard, the crew will be welcomed by seven current occupants of the ISS — three Americans, one Japanese astronaut, and three Russian cosmonauts.
The Axiom-4 crew is scheduled to spend 14 days aboard the ISS conducting microgravity research and commercial, educational, and outreach activities.
Delays and launch history
The mission faced multiple delays. It was initially scheduled for May 29, then postponed to June 8 due to incomplete readiness of the spacecraft. Launch attempts on June 10 and June 11 were cancelled because of high winds along the rocket’s ascent path and a liquid oxygen leak in the Falcon-9 rocket. There were also technical issues with the Russian module of the ISS.
This launch marks the 18th human spaceflight by SpaceX and the fourth mission by Axiom Space since 2022. The Crew Dragon capsule “Grace” is the fifth of its kind and was flying for the first time.
Axiom Space, founded nine years ago by a former NASA ISS programme manager, is working on building a commercial space station intended to succeed the ISS, which NASA plans to retire around 2030.
International cooperation
NASA and Roscosmos confirmed the mission after discussing recent repair work in the Zvezda module on the ISS. “NASA and Roscosmos have a long history of cooperation and collaboration on the International Space Station. This professional working relationship has allowed the agencies to arrive at a shared technical approach and now Axiom Mission 4 launch and docking will proceed,” said acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro.
The Axiom-4 mission also builds on a commitment made by former US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi to send an Indian astronaut to the ISS. NASA and ISRO are jointly conducting five science investigations and two STEM demonstrations during the mission.
Watch parties were organised across India, including in Jamshedpur and at City Montessori School in Lucknow, where Shukla studied, to follow the launch.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Mamdani, a state assemblyman from Queens and the son of Indian filmmaker Mira Nair and academic Mahmood Mamdani, announced his win on Tuesday night.
INDIAN-AMERICAN lawmaker Zohran Kwame Mamdani has declared victory in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, defeating former governor Andrew Cuomo.
Mamdani, a state assemblyman from Queens and the son of Indian filmmaker Mira Nair and academic Mahmood Mamdani, announced his win on Tuesday night.
“In the words of Nelson Mandela: it always seems impossible until it's done. My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it. I am honoured to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City,” Mamdani said in a post on X.
In the words of Nelson Mandela: it always seems impossible until it’s done.
My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it.
I am honored to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City. pic.twitter.com/AgW0Z30xw1 — Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) June 25, 2025
US senator Bernie Sanders congratulated Mamdani and his supporters for what he called an “extraordinary campaign.”
“You took on the political, economic and media Establishment – and you beat them. Now it's on to victory in the general election,” Sanders said.
Victory speech and concession
Speaking at a victory event in Queens, Mamdani said, > “My friends, we have done it. I will be your Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City. We have won from Harlem to Bay Ridge,” according to a report in the New York Times.
Cuomo, conceding the race, said, > “Tonight was not our night. Tonight is his night. He deserved it. He won.”
Background and previous work
Mamdani, a democratic socialist, was born in Uganda and raised in New York City.
His campaign website states that he has worked for the working class both inside and outside the legislature. His efforts include joining taxi drivers in a hunger strike that led to more than USD 450 million in debt relief, securing over USD 100 million in the state budget for better subway services and a successful fare-free bus pilot, and helping stop a proposed dirty power plant in the city.
“The cost of living is crushing working people, but Zohran believes that government can lower costs and make life easier in our city — he'll use every tool available to bring down the rent, create world-class public transit, and make it easier to raise a family,” the website states.
Key campaign promises
As Mayor, Mamdani has promised to freeze rent for all stabilised tenants and use city resources to increase housing availability and reduce rent.
His campaign has also proposed permanently fare-free buses. He plans to do this by expanding bus lanes, adding bus queue jump signals, and creating dedicated loading zones to prevent double parking.
Mamdani also pledged free childcare for all New Yorkers from six weeks to five years old and said the programme would include high-quality services for all families.
In response to rising food prices, his campaign promises a city-owned grocery store network that will focus on keeping prices low instead of making a profit.
Revenue plan
The campaign says the cost-of-living proposals will be funded through a new revenue plan.
It includes raising the corporate tax rate to match New Jersey’s 11.5 per cent, which the campaign says would bring in USD 5 billion. It also includes a flat 2 per cent tax on the top 1 per cent of earners – those making above USD 1 million annually. Currently, city income tax rates do not vary much between those making USD 50,000 and USD 50 million, the campaign says.
Additional funds would be raised through procurement reform, ending no-bid contracts, increasing tax audits, and collecting fines from corrupt landlords, which the campaign estimates could add another USD 1 billion.
“New York is too expensive. Zohran will lower costs and make life easier,” his campaign platform states.
(With inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Air India said it has complied with the directive.
A TEAM of ten officials from India's aviation safety watchdog is visiting Air India headquarters for an annual audit, according to a government memo.
The visit comes as the airline faces scrutiny following a plane crash on June 12 that killed 271 people.
Although the audit is not connected to the crash, Air India has received warning notices for compliance lapses in recent days. The airline has also reduced its routes, citing the need for "operational stability" after the crash involving a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad.
The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) team will inspect documents related to Air India's operations, previous audit findings, and action-taken reports, the memo seen by Reuters stated.
The audit team includes several flight operation inspectors and will be led by Adhiraj Yadav, a deputy chief flight operations inspector. Two members of the team are assigned to check compliance with cabin safety norms.
The audit, described as an "annual surveillance and regulatory audit", will be conducted from June 24 to 26. The memo noted that the presence of senior Air India executives is mandatory during the process.
On Saturday, the DGCA issued a warning to Air India for "repeated and serious violations" of pilot duty scheduling rules. The airline was directed to remove three company executives involved in crew scheduling.
Air India said it has complied with the directive.
The airline, which was taken over by the Tata Group in 2022, continues to face challenges in rebuilding its reputation after years of passenger complaints.
Last week, Reuters also reported that Air India was warned for safety rule breaches after three of its Airbus aircraft operated flights despite being overdue for emergency equipment checks related to escape slides.
The cause of the June 12 crash remains under investigation.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
The memorial will be located in St James's Park, next to Buckingham Palace. (Photo credit: Foster and partners)
BRITISH architect Norman Foster has been selected to design the national memorial for Queen Elizabeth.
Foster, 90, known for work that blends technology with nature in modern urban settings, described the opportunity as an "honour and a privilege".
The memorial will include two statues of the late Queen—one on horseback, and another showing her walking arm in arm with her husband Prince Philip.
Queen Elizabeth, the UK's longest-serving monarch, died in September 2022 at the age of 96, after more than 70 years on the throne. She was succeeded by her eldest son, now King Charles.
The memorial will be located in St James's Park, next to Buckingham Palace. A glass bridge inspired by the Queen’s wedding tiara will also form part of the design.
"At the heart of our masterplan is a translucent bridge symbolic of her majesty as a unifying force, bringing together nations, countries, the Commonwealth, charities and the armed forces," Foster said in a statement.
Foster began shaping city landscapes in the 1960s and received the Pritzker Prize in 1999, considered one of the highest honours in architecture.
His notable projects include Apple’s circular headquarters in California, the Millennium Bridge and Wembley Stadium in London, and the Reichstag in Berlin.
In 1997, Queen Elizabeth personally appointed Foster to the Order of Merit, a group limited to 24 individuals recognised for contributions to the arts, literature, science, and learning.
Final plans for the memorial are expected to be revealed next year.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Health secretary Wes Streeting attends an event to launch “NHS Day of Action” on March 28, 2025 in Runcorn, England.(Photo by Cameron Smith/Getty Images)
HEALTH SECRETARY Wes Streeting has revealed there is no money in the budget to set up an assisted dying service, just days after MPs voted to support the controversial law.
The new legislation passed by a narrow margin of 23 votes last Friday (20), but Streeting - who opposed the bill - said the government hasn't allocated any funds to make it work, the BBC reported.
Writing on Facebook, Streeting explained his concerns about the vote. He pointed out that the NHS is already struggling with money problems and many people can't get proper end-of-life care. He worries this could put extra pressure on dying patients.
"The truth is that creating those conditions will take time and money," Streeting wrote. He added that even if the service might save money in the long run, "setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply."
"There isn't a budget for this," he said. "Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one."
Despite his opposition, Streeting promised to work properly on the technical details if the law goes through. He said he has "enormous respect" for those who support the bill.
A government report from May looked at the costs and potential savings. It found the NHS could save between £919,000 and £10.3 million in the first six months alone. After ten years, savings could reach £5.84m to £59.6m.
But there would be significant costs too. Running the service could cost over £10m a year within ten years, and training staff could cost more than £11m in just the first six months.
The bill now goes to the House of Lords for detailed examination. Supporters say it will give terminally ill people choice over how they die and prevent suffering. Critics worry people might be pressured into choosing assisted dying.
Campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen, who has terminal cancer herself, told BBC Radio 4 that Lords should examine the bill closely but not try to overturn what MPs decided.
"Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose," she said. Dame Esther admitted she might have to travel to Switzerland's Dignitas clinic because the new law probably won't be ready in time for her.
Paralympian Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, who opposes the plans, wants stronger safeguards added. "We've been told it's the strongest bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not a very high bar," she said.
Tory peer Lord Shinkwin called for "forensic scrutiny" of the bill, saying many MPs would want another look at the safeguards for vulnerable people like disabled and elderly people. The bill could still fail if it gets stuck in the House of Lords for too long.
But Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who brought the bill forward, warned she would be "upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue."