Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Insulting’ reporting about India arrivals

‘Insulting’ reporting about India arrivals

By Amit Roy

WE CAN all understand the deep concern about the Indian variant of the Covid-19 virus threatening prime minister Boris Johnson’s plan to lift all restrictions on social contacts on June 21.


But there was some dodgy reporting last weekend. Many in the media followed a Sunday newspaper page one story, “20,000 allowed to fly into UK from India.”

It said: “At least 20,000 passengers who could have been infected with a virulent strain of Covid-19 were allowed to enter Britain while Boris Johnson delayed imposing a travel ban from India.”

Allowed to enter Britain? The phrase is quite objectionable, racist even.

My guess is that the vast majority were Indians with British nationality returning home to the UK. I assume they had gone to India for the usual reasons – attending to sick, elderly parents, going to weddings and doing business.

As British citizens, there is no question of “allowing” them in. They have an absolute right to return to this country: though, of course, they have to go into quarantine in a hotel for 10 days.

Had the 20,000 been white British folk, Boris would have been criticised for leaving them in the lurch. Instead, everyone attacked the prime minister for not being quicker to put India on the UK’s “red list” of countries.

The report in the Sunday newspaper quoted an unidentified Whitehall source: “It’s very clear that we should have closed the border to India earlier and that Boris did not do so because he didn’t want to offend Modi.”

The report added: “The rise of the new variant has caused tensions in Whitehall about whether Johnson delayed putting India on the red list because he was hoping to fly to Delhi on April 25 to discuss a post-Brexit trade deal with India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi.

“On April 19, Johnson was forced to cancel the trip and it was announced India would be added to the red list; travellers were given four days to get home. Civil Aviation Authority figures suggest that 900 people arrived daily from India between April 2 and April 23.”

The TV presenter Piers Morgan, who left his job on ITV’s Good Morning Britain following a row over comments he made about Meghan Markle, shared the article with his Twitter followers: “More shameful dithering by our Prime Minister – @ BorisJohnson has done this throughout the pandemic, constantly leaving it too late to act, with deadly consequences.”

Labour MP Yvette Cooper, who chairs the home affairs select committee, similarly told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show last Sunday (16): “I think we shouldn’t be in this situation in the first place because this was not inevitable and they should have taken action on the India variant much earlier. They should have put it [India] on the red list (earlier).”

She should have made it clear that Indians with British nationality cannot be treated differently from white Britons. But one can almost depend on the “too little, too late” Labour party to be both anti-Indian and knee-jerk in its reaction.

More For You

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

DIVISIVE AGENDA:Police clash withprotesters outside Epping councilafter a march from the Bell Hotelhousing asylum seekers last Sunday(31)

Getty Images

Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

August is dubbed 'the silly season’ as the media must fill the airwaves with little going on. But there was a more sinister undertone to how that vacation news vacuum got filled this year. The recurring story of the political summer was the populist right’s confidence in setting the agenda and the anxiety of opponents about how to respond.

Tensions were simmering over asylum. Yet frequent predictions of mass unrest failed to materialise. The patchwork of local protests and counter-protests had a strikingly different geography to last summer. The sporadic efforts of disorder came in the affluent southern suburbs of Epping and Hillingdon, Canary Wharf and Cheshunt with no disorder and few large protests in the thirty towns that saw riots last August. Prosecutions, removing local ringleaders, deter. Local cohesion has been a higher priority where violence broke out than everywhere else. Hotel use for asylum has halved - and is more common in the south. The Home Office went to court to keep asylum seekers in Epping’s Bell Hotel, for now, yet stresses its goal to stop using hotels by 2029. The Refugee Council’s pragmatic suggestion of giving time-limited leave to remain to asylum seekers from the five most dangerous countries could halve the need for hotels within months.

Keep ReadingShow less