How the Jaipur Literary Festival brand has gone global
JLF London, which has been going for 10 years, concluded last weekend at the British Library, which is itself marking its 50th anniversary
By Amit RoyJun 15, 2023
Sanjoy K Roy has revealed how the Jaipur Literary Festival (JLF), which he produces as managing director of an organisation called Teamwork Arts, has become an extraordinarily successful global brand.
JLF began in a modest manner in 2006 in the Rajasthan capital of Jaipur which remains its mothership, but in the past 17 years, the festival has been exported to the UK, the US, Canada and other countries. JLF London, which has been going for 10 years, concluded last weekend at the British Library, which is itself marking its 50th anniversary.
Present were the triumvirate who run JLF – Sanjoy and festival directors William Dalrymple and Namita Gokhale. Sanjoy was an honoured guest last week at the offices of Eastern Eye which has featured many of the authors who drew large crowds last weekend. On July 20, he will make a trip to York where he is being given an honorary degree by the university as recognition for JLF’s contribution to the arts.
In some ways, JLF has done the government’s work by taking Indian soft power to the world - though Sanjoy has found the perception of India varies from country to country. The festival in Jaipur now attracts half a million people. It is considered the world’s biggest literary festival. “Our biggest venue can hold 17,000 people, our smallest 700,” said Sanjoy. “Our whole focus is on young people. So 80 per cent of our audience is below the age of 27.
“Entry used to be free, but since Covid we started charging because we have to limit the numbers. But online 22 million people viewed JLF 2023. That’s free.” Most literary festivals struggle to find sponsors, but it seems in India, there are enough entrepreneurs who are eager to back the brand. Also, big name authors do not require too much arm twisting to make the journey to Jaipur. Sanjoy listed the reasons why celebrities from abroad are drawn to JLF: “People come from all over. First, it’s India. The main festival is in India. Our hospitality is legendary, the music, the parties, the way we do it. We are situated in palaces and forts.”
Sanjoy K Roy
JLF discovered Oprah Winfrey long before Prince Harry did. After her visit in JLF’s fourth year, when she had to be treated like royalty, it proved much easier getting American authors. When the American queen of talk shows wanted to make a low profile visit to a slum, her staff had to be persuaded this wasn’t best done in a stretch limo.
“But, (overseas), the UK has always been our primary focus, obviously with Willie being from here, and much of our tradition of writing evolving from here,” Sanjoy explained. “So we looked at London as a way to be able to garner a different kind of audience, but also selling to the UK – and creating an opportunity where we introduced JLF to all those people who didn’t travel out to India.” His contact was Jude Kelly, who was artistic director of the South Bank in London from 2006 to 2018. “Why don’t we do it here?” she suggested to Sanjoy. The then Indian high commissioner in London, Navtej Sarna, who was also an author, held a reception, bringing together decision makers from the JLF and the British Library.
“And we said, ‘Why don’t we get into bed with the British Library?’ which is far more directional as far as this goes, and perhaps a more appropriate home for the festival. So six odd years ago, we set up at the British Library. And that has been very, very successful with large-scale audiences, a very large online presence for which you need to pay. So, in London, there are three venues within the British Library that we do the festival in. And then there’s all of the evening stuff in London. In many ways London continues to be the heart or the capital of the arts world. And, therefore, I think it’s very important for us to be pretty much part of this. In the UK we also went to Belfast. ” Sanjoy continued: “And then we looked at America because we had all these American people coming out (to Jaipur) on the back of Oprah.”
The reach of JLF was extended to include American writing because “you get a restricted amount of information from the New York Times or the Times Literary Supplement. Our advantage is we don’t have to worry about getting the big names, they come anyway. And our audiences come for the immersive experience.
Shashi Tharoor
“We have the advantage of being able to programme a great many academics on subjects that otherwise many festivals would struggle with. So we do (Yale professor) Priyamvada Natarajan on astrophysics and black holes or Venki Ramakrishnan, Nobel Laureate, or any of the (well known) economists or (experts on) medicine. We try and do as much of that as possible, because we think it’s our responsibility to get this kind of information. There’s a huge focus on science, economics, medicine and health, apart from issues like mental health and gender and war and migration and identity.
“After London, we set up in Boulder, Colorado. The mayor there said, ‘If we don’t learn to understand diversity, we’ll die as a city.’ And in the US, JLF is in Houston, which is really at the crossroads between energy and science and medicine.
“(We are in) New York because it’s New York, you have to be there. And then Toronto because Vikas Swarup, our former High Commissioner who wrote Slumdog Millionaire or Q & A, was very keen that we set up something in Canada, so we set up Toronto.
“Then, separately in Australia, the then premier of that bit of Australia, and the governor of that province were very keen that we brought JLF so they bid for JLF against Melbourne. And we took it to Adelaide. And then we have JLF Doha, and JLF Soneva Fushi in the Maldives. We have just opened JLF Spain, which was (in the heritage city of) Valladolid and Madrid. Valladolid was the erstwhile capital of Spain; it is an hour from Madrid by fast train or two hours by car.”
JLF, he said, is “about taking literature, amalgamation of literature, providing different perspectives, from different points of view, from different skin tones, to different parts of the world. It’s not necessarily just about India, because in all our festivals, we’ll have a whole slew of writing from across the world.” The festival In India could once invite authors from Pakistan, but given the political tensions, that is no longer possible.
Sanjoy said: “I think having writers in literary festivals provides you with considered information. And when you have considered information as opposed to WhatsApp university, it helps break down ignorance. And by breaking down ignorance, hopefully it helps people push back on fear and hatred and violence in a sense. More importantly, 60 per cent of the festival programming tends to be non-fiction. So we do everything from maths and sciences to AI and technology and health and medicine and environment and so on and so forth.
“And we do a series that runs across all our festivals, which is the urgency on borrowed time, which is on the environment. Is there a way to break down the divide between science and the arts? In present day education either you choose science or the arts. Can we get educationists to understand that you need both arts and science?”
Panellist Hailey Willington (BPI), Roshan Chauhan (Daytimers), Indy Vidyalankara (UK Music/BPI), Kara Mukerjee (Warner Music Group), Mithila Sarna (Arts Council England), and Jataneel Banerjee (PRS for Music) at Lila’s “Future Unveiled” event, held at the BPI office in London on September 16, 2025
Only 28% of South Asian musicians in the UK can rely on music as a full-time income
Around seven in ten say they are overlooked or unseen in key industry roles
Artists face repeated challenges like family worries about stability, difficulty accessing money, and no guidance from mentors
The community agrees the path forward needs proper guidance, visible decision-makers, and financial support tailored to their journey
Surveyed artists work across multiple genres and aim for global audiences but face structural challenges
When the lights went down at the BPI’s London office for Lila’s “Future Unveiled” event in mid-September, speakers and delegates were not gathering to celebrate a triumph. They had gathered to confront a simple, brutal truth: the music industry was failing them. For South Asian artists and professionals, the dream of a lasting career was crashing against a set of measurable, stubborn barriers. The South Asian Soundcheck changed that. It was impossible for the industry to continue ignoring the data since it was evident and impossible to overlook.
Panellists Hailey Willington (BPI), Roshan Chauhan (Daytimers), Indy Vidyalankara (UK Music/BPI), Kara Mukerjee (Warner Music Group), Mithila Sarna (Arts Council England), and Jataneel Banerjee (PRS for Music) at Lila’s “Future Unveiled” event, held at the BPI office in London on September 16, 2025
Data reveals daily struggles behind the statistics
Statistics, however damaging they may be, cannot tell the complete story. Each percentage point represents a daily struggle. The survey, run by the non-profit Lila, gathered voices from 349 creators, managers, producers and industry workers, revealing a community bursting with talent but stranded without a map to sustainable work.
Financial precarity and invisibility
The numbers are stark and consistent. Consider the financial reality: only 28% can actually make a living from their music. For the vast majority, it's a side hustle. Compounding this is a deep-seated sense of erasure: nearly seven in ten (68%) feel they are either poorly represented or entirely invisible within the business. The study laid bare the personal toll.
Lila’s Data Consultant Sania Haq presenting the findings of the South Asian Soundcheck
The weight of stereotypes and family pressure
Imagine constantly being told what kind of music you should make, based purely on your name or skin colour; 45% of respondents face that very stereotype. Then there’s the pressure at home, with two in five (40%) navigating family concerns that this path is just too unstable. And cutting through it all is the blunt reality of prejudice: a sobering 32% have faced direct racial discrimination in their careers.
Beyond prejudice: the missing links of money and mentorship
These aren't abstract figures. They outline the reality of versatile professionals. Respondents said they work across an average of seven genres, yet are systematically shut out from the rooms where line-ups are decided, artists are signed, and real power is held.
The report also flagged practical barriers beyond prejudice. More than half, that is 54%, said they struggled to access funding, and similar numbers described gaps in industry networks and business knowledge such as contracts and rights. That combination; lack of money, know-how and connections is what stalls careers, not a shortage of talent.
Sophie Jones, CSO at the BPI, delivers the opening speech of the evening
The “Progress Paradox”
Lila founder Vikram Gudi framed the findings with a phrase the report uses repeatedly: the Progress Paradox. While 69% of respondents say they have seen improvements in South Asian visibility over the past two years, that perceived progress has not translated into representation where it matters: the boardrooms, A&R desks and festival programming committees that allocate budgets and define careers.
“Seventy-three percent earn some money from music, but only 27% earn enough to rely on it as a sustainable career,” Gudi told delegates, summarising a gap that numbers alone struggle to convey. The report also notes the headline figure of 28% who can rely on music full-time. Think about that. Nearly three-quarters are making some money from music, scraping together a living from their art. Yet barely a quarter can actually depend on it to pay the rent. That void, between grinding away and truly building a life, is where the real story lies.
Vikram Gudi presented key findings to label executives festival programmers and trade bodies
The invisible wall of representation
That gap is compounded by what respondents described as an “invisible wall”: the absence of people who look like them in positions of power. Two-thirds of those surveyed identified the lack of South Asian professionals in industry roles as the single biggest barrier to progression. Without visible senior figures, the path into senior programming, label deals and streaming strategy remains shadowy and difficult to navigate.
Without mentors who have lived the same experience, many feel they are learning the rules of the business in public. One anonymous respondent summed it up bluntly: “There are virtually no visible and successful South Asian artists in the mainstream, people simply do not know where to place us.”
A three-part solution
The Soundcheck does more than catalogue obstacles; in fact, it points clearly to remedies. So, what’s the way out? The response from the community was crystal clear. Roughly three-quarters agreed on a three-part prescription for survival.
First: mentoring that actually teaches you the rules and points you to decision-makers. Second: real representation in the rooms that sign, programme and pay artists. And third, they need dedicated funding and actual financial pathways that are accessible and understand their unique journeys.
The report makes it clear these aren't just items on a list; they are interconnected. Without funding, representation is an empty gesture. Without mentorship, that funding is likely to be wasted. Each element needs the other to actually work.
Suren Seneviratne from the DAYTIMERS Collective
The emotional cost of being boxed in
Respondents described the everyday consequences of those structural gaps. Artists who work across multiple genres said they were routinely typecast: an electronic producer might be nudged towards “Asian Underground” tracks; a classically trained musician expected to add bhangra flourishes regardless of artistic intent. For 40% of respondents, pursuing music means repeated conversations at home about financial security.
For many, the prize of mainstream validation remains distant, and the cost of trying to bridge that gap is emotional as much as economic. One participant put it simply: “All I want is to tell my mum I have been booked to play at my favourite venue and for her to be excited, but I cannot.” These testimonies are threaded throughout the report to give voice to the statistics.
The global ambition vs. local limits
The study also highlights a further artistic anxiety: 45% worry that specialising in South Asian music will limit their broader industry opportunities, and 71% believe the industry has limited acceptance for artists who do not fit traditional categories. In short: artists are ambitious and global in outlook, but the industry still thinks in narrow boxes.
Members of Warner Music’s ERG with some of the Lila TeamAudience at South Asian Soundcheck The Future Unveiled showcase at Tileyard Studios,London
Industry reaction and next steps
Industry bodies took the findings seriously at the launch. The Soundcheck is supported by major organisations including UK Music, the BPI, the Musicians’ Union (MU), Warner Music Group (WMG), the Music Managers Forum (MMF), Arts Council England and PRS for Music, and the research also consulted groups such as Bradford City of Culture and the Association of Independent Festivals. Lila unveiled eight key insights at Future Unveiled on 16 September 2025, in a preview hosted by BPI in partnership with Warner Music Group and Elephant Music, an assembly of partners that suggests the report has the power to move institutional levers if they choose to act.
From talk to tangible change
The survey reveals a tension that defines many of their careers: this gap between putting in the work and finding security shows why targeted help is necessary. After the report came out, the room’s discussion turned straight to solutions: pilot mentorship programmes, clearer access to funding, and real initiatives to bring in fresh talent.
The response from music publications and activist circles hasn't been an outright celebration, but wary optimism. Coverage in specialist outlets described the Soundcheck as the missing piece of evidence needed to shift diversity conversations from moral urgency to measurable targets. Commentators emphasised the report’s value in informing pilot programmes like mentorship schemes, targeted grant funds and recruitment pipelines, and in providing a baseline against which progress can be tested.
Members of Warner Music\u2019s ERG with some of the Lila Team www.easterneye.biz
The real test: action or another interim?
Implementation will reveal whether the Soundcheck becomes a catalyst for change or another well-documented interim. The report’s message to the industry is blunt: warm sentiments won’t cut it anymore. What’s needed are tangible, funded pathways. That starts with grant programmes and fellowships built specifically for South Asian artists, rather than asking them to contort themselves to fit outdated criteria. It means pushing the doors open, hiring programmers, A&Rs and commissioners, and making a real, public effort to find this missing talent.
And mentorship can’t be a coffee meeting that goes nowhere; it has to be a dedicated bridge, linking emerging artists with established figures who have the clout to actually pull them up. The ultimate goal is to plant champions in the rooms where it counts, people who grasp the cultural context and will fight for their work when the final selection is decided and the big money is allocated.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.