The actor has a truly terrible track record of selecting screenplays that make any kind of sense, writes Asjad Nazir
By Asjad NazirNov 02, 2023
IT MAY have had an eye-catching trailer loaded with special effects and a unique futuristic setting, but there was plenty of evidence that Ganapath would become a colossal disaster ahead of its release.
That is because lead star Tiger Shroff has a truly terrible track record of selecting screenplays that make any kind of sense or will be engaging to an audience. I had written about that very fact weeks before the newly released action entertainer was due to hit cinemas.
Sadly, all the apprehensions were justified because the actor has delivered yet another Bollywood film, where fight sequences and him showing off his gym honed body have more importance than the basic storyline and characterisation. That is why, like most of his other movies, it was completely panned by critics and audiences, who were silly enough to waste money on watching it. When all the calculations are done, it will likely be this year’s biggest box office disaster.
Tiger Shroff in 'Ganapath'
While Tiger ticks most Bollywood boxes, including acting, muscular physique, dancing ability, world class fighting skills and likeability, he wouldn’t know a good screenplay if it karate kicked him in the face. Right from the beginning of his career, he has been selecting nonsense storylines in action driven projects like the Baaghi trilogy, two Heropanti movies, Munna Michael, and A Flying Jatt. The one big success he has had was War, but that was largely due to headline star Hrithik Roshan.
All his films have him dancing brilliantly, showing off his six-pack and demonstrating dynamic fighting skills, but the remaining 90 per cent have been headache inducing plotlines filled with holes big enough to fly a rocket ship through. In most cases he has chosen to work with obviously dud directors, who have a worse story sense than him.
But the greatest Bollywood icons, across the generations have shown that in most cases a strong storyline and a good filmmaker will power you to great success. Showing off a gymhoned body and an ability to do a flying kick are not enough to sustain a career. It is a shame because unlike all the other younger actors under 35 currently working in Bollywood, Tiger actually has an all-round ability and likeability to be a big success. But films like his newly released action-drama aren’t doing him any favours. He has forthcoming films like the ridiculous looking Bade Miyan Chote Miyan, which will also have an inevitably dud storyline.
Tiger needs to watch movies that are working more deeply and learn about the importance of good writing. Perhaps he should get advice from more experienced people in the film industry or maybe look beyond Bollywood, including internationally, to work with filmmakers worthy of his talent. If he doesn’t change track soon, the heroic looking star will become a wasted talent who never reached his potential, due to poor choices. Don’t be surprised if you don’t see the planned sequel to Ganapath, because it’s another piece of rubbish that he can throw on the scrap heap. Hopefully he will finally use it as a learning experience to find better written stories.
THERE has been very little substantive coverage of Sir Keir Starmer’s first visit to India as prime minister in the British press.
One paper ignored the visit altogether, preferring to devote three pages to something it considered far more important – David and Victoria Beckham. There was also the regular instalment of just how awful Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is, especially when compared to Kate, the Princess of Wales. One paper did have a story, but it was about how Starmer would not liberalise visas for India.
Britain once became rich through ruling India. History could repeat itself, though now the partnership is of equals.
The UK economy could be rescued, indeed transformed, though a closer engagement with India made possible by the Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
The FTA is probably Starmer’s biggest foreign policy success, which might be one reason why his enemies want to play it down. The Times did carry a story, “British Airways to expand its flights to India”, and quoted the airline’s CEO Sean Doyle, who was part of the Starmer delegation to India.
He said: “India is not just another market. It is one of the fastest-growing major economies, the world’s most populous democracy, and a tech and innovation hub that is reshaping global business. Forging stronger links with India is not only logical – it’s essential. British Airways has been flying to India for 100 years, making us one of the longest-serving international carriers in the country.”
The Times made only a passing reference to what Starmer found on landing in India: “During his visit to Mumbai this week, the prime minister received the kind of reception politicians in Britain can only dream of. As his convoy made its way into the city centre, it passed more than 5,700 posters bearing his face. At one point, Sir Keir Starmer even found himself joining in with a traditional Indian dance to celebrate Diwali.”
The Financial Times covered the visit,but wrote at length about visas.
To be sure, papers publish stories they think will boost sales. But they need to cover stories other than boats, Farage and Meghan. The India story is much more exciting and has the potential to make life better for everyone.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.