Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

How Covid-19 is undoing the diversity agenda

By Nic Hammarling

Head of Diversity

Pearn Kandola


THE beginning of April was meant to mark a big week for diversity. Specifically, gender di­versity, because Mon­day (4) was the third annual deadline for or­ganisations with more than 250 employees to report their respective gender pay gaps.

As in previous years, there would have been a frantic rush for many to submit their reports in time. A fair few would even have been late. There would have been a torrent of na­tional media coverage, politicians and business leaders would have re­newed promises to bal­ance the scales of gen­der inequality, and dur­ing the week, we would have picked apart the data to see what progress had really been made.

None of that has hap­pened, though. In a joint statement in March, the minister for Women & Equalities and the EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission) chair said that in light of the pres­sure that Covid-19 is putting on businesses, “it is only right to sus­pend enforcement of gender pay gap report­ing this year.”

While it’s right that we are sympathetic to the vast number of or­ganisations currently facing unprecedented challenges, I can’t help but worry about the message this decision sends. Namely, that di­versity is not business critical in the modern workplace. Rather, it’s a ‘nice to have’.

I’m also sure that it won’t end here. Allow­ing organisations to take their foot off the gas in this way will be the first of many back­ward steps for diversity.

It’s always been the way that, in times of cri­sis or pressure, diversity suffers. During the fi­nancial crash of 2008- 09, for example, women and BAME workers were, by far, the worst affected. I have no doubt that Covid-19 will tell a similar story. Al­ready, a new piece of analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies has reported that women are about one-third more likely than men to work in a sector that has been shut down.

We can even map this regression. If it’s anything like that which we’ve seen in previous crises, it will unfold in three distinct stages.

Those on part-time or zero-hours contracts will be the first to take a hit. Many of the indus­tries in which these kinds of contracts are common, such as hos­pitality, tourism and services, are facing sig­nificant difficulty in the current climate. The in­evitable impact that this will have on diversity hinges on the fact that people from BAME backgrounds are over-represented in the zero-hours workforce.

Second, regrettably, there will inevitably be redundancies. The gov­ernment has unveiled a generous support pack­age, but furloughing staff is not a long-term strategy. And that means leaders will have to make critical decisions about who stays and who goes, but when these decisions are made hastily, bias seeps into the process. We know from many previ­ous cases that women and people from BAME backgrounds are disproportionately affected by redundancy processes.

Finally, when coronavirus is behind us, re­search suggests that we are likely to see an increase in minority leaders experiencing pressure to take on riskier, less stable opportunities. Many will have seen the impact on other minor­ity workers and may see these more tumultuous positions as their only opportunities to progress.

The critical question, of course, is whether we can stop any of this from happening. Is it possible to protect diversity, instead of letting it fall by the wayside like in previous crises?

The actions of senior leaders are key to this. We need them to con­sider what they are pri­oritising right now. The areas of focus during tumultuous times tell everyone – employees and external parties alike – what is really im­portant to an organisa­tion. If we don’t priori­tise diversity and inclu­sion now, then people will see it for exactly what it is – lip service.

In times of survival, we look for reassurance and familiarity. As a re­sult, many will place the most trust in those who they can see – and therefore feel – are visi­bly like them, rather than opting for what are perceived as ‘riskier’ options. This kind of bi­as means minorities are less likely to be seen as important or reliable team members. But it’s by embracing other opinions that we are of­ten able to come up with the most innova­tive solutions to prob­lems. This, in itself, is why diversity is of such value to businesses.

For those who are willing to recognise it as such, this moment is a real opportunity for leaders to make a sin­cere commitment to di­versity. Now is not the time to put it on hold, now is the time for them to embrace it, to champion it and to make conscious deci­sions about the kinds of organisations that they want to represent.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less