Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Hamied: Helping those most in need

By Amit Roy

YUSUF HAMIED has given an un­dertaking to Eastern Eye that he will help poor people in India get the Covid vaccine.


This is crucial because there are already worries that when it comes to the distribution of vaccines, there will be a poor-rich divide across countries and societies.

Yusuf, who is head of the Indian pharma giant Cipla, said his firm did not manufacture vaccines.

“But we will market the vaccines and give it free to those who cannot afford them through our charitable arm,” Yusuf assured me.

He made the same pledge on Monday (30) when Cambridge Uni­versity announced that its chemis­try department was being renamed after Yusuf Hamied, a Christ’s Col­lege alumnus, until 2050 in recogni­tion of the “transformational gift” it had received from him.

Yusuf told the meeting attended by senior academics: “Twenty years ago, we played a pivotal and pio­neering role in the fight against HIV/AIDS, essentially in Africa.

“Currently, we are again in the forefront in the fight against Cov­id-19 by supplying medications such as Favipiravir, Remdesivir and Tocilizumab, as also selected diag­nostics and sanitary products.

“Regrettably, we do not manu­facture vaccines, but hopefully we will use our marketing network for effective distribution.”

Between 1954 and 1960, Yusuf studied at the chemistry department in Lensfield Road, Cambridge, first as an undergraduate and then for his PhD.

“Since leaving Cambridge in 1960, I have been totally involved with healthcare and the pharma industry primarily in India,” he said.

“We laid the foundation for basic drug manufacture in our country. We fought with the government and persuaded them to change the laws covering intellectual property, so there was no monopoly in three major areas – agriculture, food and health. Consequently, the Indian pharmaceutical industry thrived and today is considered the ‘phar­macy centre of the world’.

“Over the years, my mission has been to access quality, affordable drugs for all and that none should be denied. I sincerely believe there should be no divide between the developed, emerging and third world in healthcare.”

On a personal note, he said: “There’s always been a deep bond between myself, the university, Christ’s College, the department of chemistry, and this bond has now lasted for 66 years and will continue till my dying days.

“I have been truly blessed by my journey throughout my life, in par­ticular my years in Cambridge … The recognition by the department of chemistry in revising its name is truly humbling. What is more re­warding for me is that there will be a Yusuf Hamied Chemistry fund in perpetuity for students and schol­ars in chemistry.”

He emphasised that “the work done in Lensfield Road in the mid-to-late 1950s led to (James) Watson and (Francis) Crick developing the double helix structure of DNA”.

The vice-chancellor of Cambridge University, Stephen Toope, formally announced the naming of Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry.

“We should pause there,” he said. “Now, of course, a university would not rename any department lightly.

“The decision to do so is based on something utterly remarkable, a gift that transforms the capacity of the department to attract and retain the world’s most gifted academic talent, a gift that will support early career researchers and doctoral candidates, a gift that will ensure that chemistry at Cambridge re­mains forever at the international pinnacle of teaching and research.”

His sentiments were echoed by James Keeler, the current head of the chemistry department, who ex­plained the significance of Yusuf’s gift: “What your gift will give us is independence of action. And under the current environment, when we are subject to the whims of govern­ments and research councils, hav­ing the ability to act independently according to our own priorities, is incredibly important to us. And it will give us an advantage that very few chemistry departments in the country, and dare I say, around the world have.

“So this is really exceptionally important for us. And as the vice-chancellor has said, it is a transfor­mational gift.”

Keeler went on: “The strategy the department has had – unspoken and sometimes spoken – is that we recruit the best people, we support them. And we know that they will flourish. And your gift will enable us to go on in that way to recruit the best people, and really very impor­tantly, to make sure that they have the facilities and the resources they need in order to be able to flourish.

“And that means all the way from the most senior august professor down to the most junior PhD stu­dent – and we know especially in chemistry. And I think it’s a unique feature of the subject that PhD stu­dents are the absolute lifeblood of research here. The good high qual­ity PhD student is the real driver of innovation, the real drivers of hard work … That is again incredibly important to us.”

There was a brief comment from Jane Stapleton, the first woman to be Master of Christ’s in nearly 600 years: “There’s always excitement here when we hear you’ll be visit­ing. And when you do this, it’s al­ways marvellous to hear you say with that marvellous twinkle in your eye, ‘When I step back into Christ’s, I feel like a young man.’

“When you come to visit, your energy and enthusiasm are infec­tious. Christ’s has no greater sup­porter than you.”

The size of Yusuf’s donation to the university has not been revealed but is said to be “substantial”.

Incidentally, as Professor Sir Ven­katraman Ramakrishnan stepped down on Monday (30) as Royal So­ciety president, it was announced Yusuf has extended his collabora­tion with the Society by five years.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Anti immigration protesters attend the 'Glasgow Reclaims The Streets From Far-right Hatred And Violence' anti-racism protest on June 13, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland.

Getty Images

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Sunder Katwala

Born in the mid-1970s I felt part of a lucky generation, which gained from pushing back the overt racism of that era. When we talk about stronger “social norms”, what we mean is that few people thought that monkey chants at the football or racist jokes on the telly were normal anymore – while more had Asian and black colleagues, neighbours and friends.

That past progress is put to the test today. A terrible crime in Belfast saw organised efforts at indiscriminate racist attacks on migrants and ethnic minorities, whose only connection to the crime was the colour of their skin. Those seeking to make racism fashionable again have the online megaphone of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, on their side.

Past progress could be experienced unevenly, too. Being of mixed Indian and Irish Catholic parentage, I saw both identities rise in status once the BBC comedy Goodness Gracious Me inverted who could tell the jokes, and peace broke out in Northern Ireland. Yet, British Muslims of my generation felt under more intense scrutiny after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Efforts to tackle anti-Muslim hatred risked being stalled by arguments over what to call it and how to define it. The government’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility seeks to transcend the confusion that the term “Islamophobia” could generate. But the challenge is not just to define the prejudice – but to find effective ways to shrink it.

There are sobering findings on the starting points in new research from British Future and the British Muslim Trust. More than half of British Muslims report experiencing prejudice based on their religion last year – a quarter in person and over a third online. A third of the public hold mostly negative views. One in six endorse sweeping and often indiscriminate hostility. Anti-Muslim hostility can have about twice the social reach as prejudice against other faith or ethnic minorities.

Tackling this hostility cannot be the responsibility of Muslims alone. It will take a whole-of-society effort. After all, this is foundationally about the attitudes towards a six per cent minority group, held among the 94 per cent of us who are not Muslim.

Keep ReadingShow less