MINISTERS have been criticised for failing to stop the collapse of travel firm Thomas Cook – as customers were told they may have to wait up to two months for refunds.
An online refund system is due to launch on October 7 after the company went into liquidation last week, putting 9,000 UK staff out of work and leaving 150,000 British holidaymakers stuck overseas.
The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said direct debit customers would be refunded within 14 days, but added others would have to wait up to 60 days.
Thomas Cook secured a £900 million rescue deal led by its largest shareholder in August but a recent demand from its banks to raise a further £200m saw the deal collapse.
Business secretary Andrea Leadsom has been criticised after it emerged she did not speak to executives from the holiday firm leading up to its closure.
Documents show Leadsom, ministers and officials from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) had a little discussion with the 178-year-old firm until after it had entered liquidation.
Over two-thirds of people on holiday when the tour operator collapsed have flown home to the UK as part of Operation Matterhorn.
The majority of Thomas Cook holidays are packages. Anyone who has bought a package holiday will be covered by the Air Travel Organiser’s Licence scheme. The CAA said this week that more than 43,000 people abroad were due to return on or before Sunday (6).
Sid Singh, 52, and his wife, from Bradford, had to travel home from Mallorca after being left stranded. The couple flew out a day before the firm went bust.
Singh said: “No one said anything: no reps, whether the rep will be coming or not. There are other people we’ve travelled with, but they’re in different hotels, so we’re not sure what’s happening with them. There were two women from Leeds.”
Reena, who bought a package holiday from Manchester to Split in Croatia and was due to travel last week, said: “I checked in at the airport, I assumed nothing of it. I lost out on flights and hotel.
“I don’t know whether to cry. If I was there, at least I am stranded in a nice hot country, but I was in Manchester Airport. I am on annual leave, I have to twiddle my thumbs at home.”
Labour MP Afzal Khan, who has supported the travel company’s employees in Manchester, told Eastern Eye: “I was shocked to hear the devastating news over the collapse of Thomas Cook. I know it is impacting our city and community hard, with over 3,000 people in Greater Manchester employed by the company.
“This is another example of the government’s failure to take action. This government failed to learn its lesson from the similar Monarch collapse which took place two years ago.
“This sad and tragic event has left British holidaymakers and Thomas Cook staff in a state of limbo. The unions Unite and the Transport Salaried Staffs Association have fought valiantly for their members, while this government have done nothing.
“My Labour colleagues and I have spoken out against the government’s decision to not inject £200m to save the company and instead chose to spend £600m on the largest repatriation effort since the Second World War.”
Thomas Cook staff have been told to apply for their salary and redundancy-related payments from the Insolvency Service’s Redundancy Payment Service. Dozens of people who lost their jobs protested outside the Conservative Party Conference in Manchester on Monday (30).
Tanmanjeet Dhesi, the Labour MP for Slough in Berkshire, told Eastern Eye: “The collapse of Thomas Cook is catastrophic for so many, including holidaymakers and Thomas Cook employees. The government were warned about this collapse, yet it chose to do nothing.
“Thanks to the swift work of the Civil Aviation Authority, many tourists abroad have been able to return to the UK; however many staff members remain stranded and are being supported by trade unions.
“The priority now should be offering support to all those impacted and ensuring reform on airline insolvency so this does not happen again.”
MPs are expected to question the company, regulators and ministers during an inquiry by the BEIS select committee in October.
Asked how many times BEIS ministers or officials had met Thomas Cook over the past 12 months, a government spokesperson said: “UK government officials meet with a range of businesses on a regular basis.”
Thomas Cook boss Peter Fankhauser, 58, has appeared to blame a group of banks for not backing a bail-out plan.
He said: “The longer the talks dragged on, the more uncertainty grew, increasing the likelihood of a liquidity squeeze.
“Had we been quicker, we might not be in the situation we are now.”
Fankhauser, who has been paid £8.3m in salary and share options since November 2014, accused the banks and bondholders of “trading for every point” during the doomed funding talks.
He added: “I think it would be very difficult for me to find another job in the UK.
White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing Peter Navarro speaks to reporters outside of the West Wing of the White House on August 21, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
WHITE HOUSE trade adviser Peter Navarro criticised India as being a "Maharaj" in tariffs and claimed it operated a "profiteering scheme" by using discounted Russian crude oil, as a war of words between India and the US continued to escalate.
Navarro's comments came as India’s foreign minister, S Jaishankar, said the US had asked New Delhi to help stabilise global energy markets by buying Russian oil.
India was "cosying up to" Chinese president Xi Jinping, Navarro added.
Meanwhile, China’s ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, said Beijing "firmly opposes" Washington's steep tariffs on Delhi and called for greater co-operation between India and China, BBC reported.
According to the broadcaster, Xu likened the US to a "bully" and blamed Washington for benefiting from free trade.
However, the US was now using tariffs as a "bargaining chip" to demand "exorbitant prices" from other nations, the Chinese diplomat was quoted as saying.
Relations between New Delhi and Washington have become strained after US president Donald Trump doubled tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent, including a 25 per cent additional duties for India's purchase of Russian crude oil.
Navarro told reporters in the US, “Prior to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, India virtually bought no Russian oil... It was like almost one per cent of their need. The percentage has now gone up to 35 per cent.”
Earlier this week, Navarro wrote in the Financial Times criticising India for its procurement of Russian crude oil.
He dismissed the argument that India needs Russian oil to meet its energy requirement, saying the country acquired cheap Russian oil before making refined products, then sold on at premium prices in Europe, Africa and Asia.
"It is purely profiteering by the Indian refining industry," Navarro said.
"What is the net impact on Americans because of our trade with India? They are Maharaj in tariff. (We have) higher non-tariff barriers, massive trade deficit etc - and that hurts American workers and American business," according to him.
“The money they get from us, they use it to buy Russian oil which then is processed by their refiners,” he added.
"The Russians use the money to build arms and kill Ukrainians and Americans tax-payers have to provide more aid and military hardware to Ukrainians. That's insane.
"India does not want to recognise its role in the bloodshed," Navarro said.
Though the US imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on India for its energy ties with Russia, it has not initiated similar actions against China, the largest buyer of Russian crude oil.
Defending its purchase of Russian crude oil, India has maintained that its energy procurement is driven by national interest and market dynamics.
India turned to purchasing Russian oil sold at a discount after Western countries imposed sanctions on Moscow and shunned its supplies over its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Consequently, from a 1.7 per cent share in total oil imports in 2019-20, Russia's share increased to 35.1 per cent in 2024-25, and it is now the biggest oil supplier to India.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
THE government is preparing to take control of Liberty Steel’s South Yorkshire factories if their owner, businessman Sanjeev Gupta, fails to secure a last-minute rescue deal.
The move could save around 1,500 jobs at Speciality Steel UK, which includes steelworks in Rotherham and Stocksbridge.
At a High Court hearing on Wednesday (20), it was revealed that the government’s official receiver is ready to step in as administrator if the company goes into compulsory liquidation. Speciality Steel is facing closure after struggling for years under mounting debts and a lack of funding.
The court heard that the company has only £650,000 in its bank account but needs around £4 million each month just to pay wages. Lawyers representing creditors are pushing for the company to be wound up so its assets can be sold to repay debts. Creditors include major banks, suppliers, and Walsall Borough Council.
Sanjeev Gupta, the head of the GFG Alliance, is trying to avoid a government takeover. His lawyers asked the court to delay any decision, saying he is close to finalising a £75m funding deal with US investment giant BlackRock.
The plan would involve a “pre-pack” administration, allowing Gupta to buy back the company through a management buyout. The process is being advised by restructuring firm Begbies Traynor.
Gupta’s team argued that this commercial solution, backed by private investment, would protect jobs, keep the steelworks running, and come at no cost to UK taxpayers.
A spokesperson for Liberty Steel said, “We continue to believe our commercial solution, backed by major private capital, provides the best outcome for the business, its employees and all stakeholders concerned, without cost to UK taxpayers or unnecessary uncertainty.”
Judge Sally Barber said she could not make an immediate decision and needed more information about the next steps. She warned against acting “on a completely blind basis” and adjourned the case to give time to consider all options.
The Department for Business and Trade confirmed in a letter to creditors that the Government is ready to act.
“The official receiver is prepared, should SSUK enter into compulsory liquidation, to take control of SSUK’s affairs,” the letter said.
The government stressed that no final decision had been made to take the company into state ownership. Any such move would require ministerial approval. However, officials confirmed they had already been contacted by third parties interested in restarting steel production at the sites.
This would be the second government intervention in the UK steel industry this year. In April, ministers took control of British Steel’s plant in Scunthorpe, which was losing £250m annually. Last year, the government also gave Tata Steel a £500m support package to develop a greener electric arc furnace in Wales.
Liberty Steel’s Rotherham site hosts the UK’s largest electric arc furnace, which uses recycled scrap metal. The plant has not produced steel for about a year due to cash shortages, but workers have continued to be paid.
The problems began after the collapse of Greensill Capital in 2021, which had provided billions in loans to Gupta’s businesses. Investigations by the Serious Fraud Office into the GFG Alliance over suspected fraud and money laundering have also made fundraising more difficult.
Citibank alone is reportedly owed £233m by Speciality Steel. The creditors claim that allowing Gupta to retain control would write off most debts, and they prefer a government-led liquidation process that could offer a better chance to recover funds.
Judge Barber has referred the case to a different court, which is expected to make a final decision in the coming days, reports said.
Tesco has increased the price of its meal deal, sparking shopper anger.
Clubcard members now pay £3.85 (up from £3.60), while non-members pay £4.25 (up from £4).
Premium meal deals also rise, costing up to £6 without a Clubcard.
Some shoppers threaten a boycott, while others argue the deal still offers value.
Tesco raises meal deal prices
Tesco has announced a price hike on its popular meal deals, prompting criticism from shoppers and even boycott threats.
From this week, the standard meal deal — which includes a main such as a sandwich or salad, a snack, and a drink — will cost £3.85 for Clubcard holders (up from £3.60), and £4.25 for non-Clubcard holders (up from £4).
The supermarket’s premium meal deal, which includes higher-end options, has also gone up from £5 to £5.50 for Clubcard holders, and from £5.50 to £6 for those without.
Shopper reactions divided
The price rise has sparked a wave of frustration online, with some customers claiming the deal no longer offers value.
On Reddit, one shopper wrote: “I will be boycotting the meal deal from [Tesco] when this hike occurs.” Another added: “That’s it, I’m legit done buying these now.”
A reader responding to Manchester Evening News said: “Everything that once was a deal no longer is.”
However, not all shoppers share the outrage. Marlene Whitehead commented: “That’s still good value.” While Peter Collins argued: “It’s actually still very good value compared to buying the items separately eg., Costa coffee on its own would be roughly £2.60.”
Do Tesco meal deals still save money?
Despite the increase, Tesco insists its meal deal remains competitive. Popular choices — such as a Tesco Chicken Club sandwich, an Egg Protein Pot, and a 500ml Coca-Cola — cost £6.50 if bought individually.
That means Clubcard members still save £2.65, while non-members save £2.25.
Keep ReadingShow less
Looking ahead, Chaudry said: 'Our core strategy is centred on gyms, fitness, and wellness. Through our premium health club brand M Club and our affordable fitness chain igym, we will continue expanding across the UK.'
WATERWORLD Aqua Park has been sold to European leisure operator the Looping Group in a multi-million pound deal.
The sale takes M Investment Group’s net assets beyond £110 million, with overall shareholder value now exceeding £170 million.
Mo Chaudry, chairman of M Investment Group, said: “Waterworld has been a huge part of my life and business journey and I am proud of everything we have achieved as a Team. I am now handing over the baton to Looping, a world-class operator with the vision and expertise to take Waterworld even further ensuring the resort has an exciting future.”
He said Waterworld had been “an incredible success story and a big part of my life for over 26 years. But the time is right to hand over the baton to Looping, a world-class operator with the scale and expertise to take the attraction to the next level. This sale also enables M Investment Group to sharpen our focus on our core strengths in fitness, wellness, and international leisure opportunities.”
Chaudry confirmed that the details of the deal remain confidential but added: “As a result, M Investment Group’s net assets now exceed £110 million, and our overall business worth has grown to more than £170 million. It’s a major milestone in our journey.”
He said staff jobs at Waterworld are secure. “They have a proven track record of running successful leisure destinations across Europe, and they’ve made a clear commitment to investing in the park and supporting the local community. Staff jobs are secure, and the park’s loyal visitors can expect even more exciting developments ahead.”
Looking ahead, Chaudry said: “Our core strategy is centred on gyms, fitness, and wellness. Through our premium health club brand M Club and our affordable fitness chain igym, we will continue expanding across the UK. At the same time, our fitness solutions provider Pulse Global Group is targeting strong international growth in the Middle and Far East regions with outstanding long-term potential.”
He said Waterworld had played a key role in his business journey. “Waterworld has been more than just a business — it’s been a passion. It taught me valuable lessons in entrepreneurship, resilience, and vision. It’s been a place where millions of families have created memories, and I’m proud to have played a part in that.”
Chaudry confirmed he will not remain involved in its operations. “Waterworld will now be fully operated by Looping. I’ll remain a passionate supporter but my focus as Chairman of M Investment Group will be on driving our next phase of growth.”
Looping Group operates more than 20 leisure destinations across Europe. Laurent Bruloy, Executive Chairman and co-founder of the group, said: “We are delighted to welcome Waterworld into the Looping family. It is a truly iconic attraction, and we look forward to building on its reputation for excellence while supporting the regional community.”
Chaudry said he is now focused on the future. “I’m excited about the opportunity to make a lasting impact on health and wellbeing, both in the UK and internationally. With the combined strength of M Club, igym, and Pulse Global Group, we are well positioned in the fast-growing fitness and wellness sector whilst continuing to build a world-class family investment group.”
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: A pharmacist shows a box of Prednisolone by Zentiva in Brest, western France. -(FRED TANNEAU/AFP via Getty Images)
INDIA's Aurobindo Pharma on Wednesday (20) dismissed media reports suggesting it had finalised a deal to acquire Czech drugmaker Zentiva, calling the claims “premature” and added that no binding agreement has been signed.
The clarification came after The Economic Times reported that Aurobindo was the frontrunner to acquire Zentiva from US-based private equity firm Advent International in a deal valued between $5 billion and $5.5bn (around £3.95bn to £4.35bn). If confirmed, this would be the largest-ever overseas acquisition by an Indian pharmaceutical company.
However, Aurobindo issued a statement to stock exchanges denying that any agreement had been finalised.
“As part of our business strategy, the company regularly explores various strategic opportunities, including potential acquisitions and partnerships, which can enhance shareholder value,” Aurobindo Pharma said in a regulatory filing on Wednesday.
“But at present, no binding agreement or definitive decision has been made by the Board of Directors of the company in relation to the transaction referred to in the said article(s). Accordingly, the said news item is premature and should not be relied upon,” the company added.
Aurobindo also assured investors that it would make timely disclosures if any definitive development arises that requires notification under India's regulator, SEBI.
The company's shares fell as much as 4.7 per cent during early trading on Wednesday after the report was published, but recovered slightly following the clarification. The stock closed 3.9 per cent lower on the NSE. So far in 2025, Aurobindo Pharma’s stock has dropped around 21 per cent, compared to a two per cent rise in the benchmark Nifty 50 index.
Advent International and Zentiva have not commented on the report.
Zentiva, based in Prague, is a well-known producer of generic medicines across Europe. If Aurobindo were to go ahead with the acquisition, it would mark a major step in expanding its presence in the European market and diversifying its portfolio beyond the US.
The reported deal would surpass other significant transactions in the Indian pharma sector, including Sun Pharma’s acquisition of Ranbaxy and Biocon Biologics’ buyout of Viatris’ biosimilar business.
Aurobindo is already active in international expansion. In July, its wholly owned US subsidiary signed a deal to acquire Lannett Company LLC, a generics manufacturer, for about $276 million (£218m). That deal is aimed at strengthening its manufacturing base and product offerings in the US.
The US remains a crucial market for Aurobindo, contributing nearly half of its annual revenue. Industry analysts say Indian pharma firms are increasingly pursuing global acquisitions to mitigate risks from potential US trade policies. US president Donald Trump had recently suggested steep tariffs on imported medicines.
“We’ll be putting initially a small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year – one and a half years, maximum – it’s going to go to 150 per cent and then it’s going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country," Trump said in an interview.