Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Google to stop political microtargeting 

GOOGLE has said earlier this week that it has decided to ban political advertisers from targeting voters.

The US giant will freeze the UK political parties, politicians out of its most powerful targeted advertising systems when British politicians gear up for general elections next month.


The web giant will ban the ads from targeting voters based on any characteristics except for age, gender and broad geographical area, it said on Wednesday (20).

According to the latest policy of the American multinational giant, political parties will no longer be able to target voters based on their interests and detailed life circumstances.

The new policy is being expedited in the UK. The web giant is on a race to ensure that it comes into force before the election on December 12.

Also, political parties won't be allowed to upload data on individual voters whose personal information have been bought from commercial sources.

Google has confirmed that personal interest targeting for political ads had previously been permitted in the UK.

The company’s new policy will apply across its services, which include Google Search and YouTube.

Third-party websites that use Google's advertising system will come under the new rule.

Scott Spencer, Google's vice president of ad product management, said: "Given recent concerns and debates about political advertising, we want to improve voters' confidence in the political ads they may see on our ad platforms.

"Regardless of the cost or impact to spending on our platforms, we believe these changes will help promote confidence in digital political advertising and trust in electoral processes worldwide."

The California-based company will throwaway all political advertisements, which include false claims and suppress democratic values, according to its new policy.

Technology companies have recorded rising number of calls to limit political microtargeting following the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018 as critics opine that such activities undermine the values of democracy and the smooth functioning of democracy.

Following such calls, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Snapchat now limit so-called dark ads by forcing advertisers to prove their identity for more transparency. All the four businesses also upload their political advertisements to a searchable public archive.

The latest move by Google will stop political campaigners across the globe out of Google's Customer Match tool.

The tool permits advertisers to upload lists of contact details in order to target ads specifically at those people.

More For You

pub hotels UK

The group earned five stars for customer service and accuracy of descriptions.

coachinginngroup

Pub hotel group beat luxury chains in UK guest satisfaction survey

Highlights

  • Coaching Inn Group scores 81 per cent customer satisfaction, beating Marriott and Hilton.
  • Wetherspoon Hotels named best value at £70 per night.
  • Britannia Hotels ranks bottom for 12th consecutive year with 44 per cent score.
A traditional pub hotel group has outperformed luxury international chains in the UK's largest guest satisfaction survey, while one major operator continues its decade-long streak at the bottom of the rankings.
The Coaching Inn Group, comprising 36 relaxed inn-style hotels in historic buildings across beauty spots and market towns, achieved the highest customer score of 81per cent among large chains in Which?'s annual hotel survey. The group earned five stars for customer service and accuracy of descriptions, with guests praising its "lovely locations and excellent food and service.
"The survey, conducted amongst 4,631 guests, asked respondents to rate their stays across eight categories including cleanliness, customer service, breakfast quality, bed comfort and value for money. At an average £128 per night, Coaching Inn demonstrated that mid-range pricing with consistent quality appeals to British travellers.
J D Wetherspoon Hotels claimed both the Which? Recommended Provider status (WRPs) and Great Value badge for the first time, offering rooms at just £70 per night while maintaining four-star ratings across most categories. Guests described their stays as "clean, comfortable and good value.
"Among boutique chains, Hotel Indigo scored 79 per cent with its neighbourhood-inspired design, while InterContinental achieved 80per cent despite charging over £300 per night, and the chain missed WRP status for this reason.

Budget brands decline

However, Premier Inn, long considered Britain's reliable budget choice, lost its recommended status this year. Despite maintaining comfortable beds, guests reported "standards were slipping" and prices "no longer budget levels" at an average £94 per night.

The survey's biggest disappointment remains Britannia Hotels, scoring just 44 per cent and one star for bedroom and bathroom quality. This marks twelve consecutive years at the bottom, with guests at properties like Folkestone's Grand Burstin calling it a total dive.

Keep ReadingShow less