Lawyers flag concerns over cricket broadcast rights in Reliance-Disney deal
Combined entity would have ‘absolute control’ over viewership of sport
By Eastern Eye Mar 08, 2024
A PROPOSED merger of Walt Disney’s and Reliance’s media assets in India could spark intense anti-trust scrutiny over their market power, with lawyers flagging concerns that the combined entity’s strong portfolio of cricket broadcast rights could impact advertisers.
The Disney-Reliance $8.5 billion (£6.7bn) merger would create India’s No 1 TV player with 120 channels, with local rival Zee closest with 50. Analysts at India’s Ambit Capital estimate that the entity, which is set to be majority owned by billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries, will have a 35 per cent share of the country’s TV viewership.
While the overall TV space will be closely assessed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), six antitrust lawyers said cricket rights are going to be in spotlight as the regulators examine market share and the power of the combined entity.
Cricket has a fanatical following in India, where many fans worship players as gods. Companies shell out billions of dollars to win broadcast rights or spend on advertisements to lure consumers to their services.
Disney holds TV broadcast rights for the world’s most valuable cricket tournament, the Indian Premier League (IPL), as well as both India TV and streaming rights for International Cricket Council’s (ICC) matches. Reliance has streaming rights for the IPL, and the Indian cricket board’s rights for all matches.
KK Sharma, a former head of mergers at CCI, said the combined Disney-Reliance combo will raise eyebrows among regulators given the market power they will exert, especially in the cricket segment, requiring “deeper scrutiny.”
“If I was the regulator, I would begin with suspicion,” said Sharma, now a senior partner at Indian law firm Singhania & Co. “With Disney and Reliance together, hardly anything of cricket will be left. The regulator gets concerned even when there is a possibility of dominance. Here, it is not merely dominance but almost absolute control over cricket.”
Disney declined comment while Reliance did not respond to Reuters queries. The CCI also did not respond.
Media agency GroupM estimates sports industry spending in India totalled $1.7bn (£1.3bn) in 2022, up 49 per cent from the previous year. Cricket accounted for 85 per cent of the spending on sponsorship, endorsement and media.
The companies will approach the CCI for approvals in coming weeks. Disney and Reliance have said they hope to complete the transaction by end of this year or early 2025.
A senior Disney source did not comment on the scrutiny the merger may face, but said the company consulted a number of antitrust attorneys and is confident the deal will get final clearance.
Five other lawyers echoed similar concerns as Sharma, saying the Disney-Reliance entity’s strong grip on the cricket ecosystem could mean advertisers have less bargaining power.
Vaibhav Choukse, head of competition law at India’s J Sagar Associates, said the firms can explore socalled “behavioural commitments” such as not adjusting advertising rates for a period of time to assuage concerns of regulators, who could, in extreme cases, order the entity to divest certain channels or cricket rights.
In a note, Jefferies said the DisneyReliance entity “will sport the most lucrative cricketing rights in India, and has 40 per cent share of the advertising market in TV and streaming segments, allowing it “better ad inventory monetization”.
“The regulator’s concern as far as cricket is concerned will be on the advantage the Disney-Reliance entity will have on raising prices for advertisers,” said Karan Chandhiok, head of competition law at India’s Chandhiok & Mahajan.
Disney and Reliance – before the merger – have competed intensely on cricket. Reliance recently offered free live streaming of IPL matches for which it had paid $2.9bn (£2.3bn) in rights. Later, Disney offered free live streaming of cricket World Cup on mobile devices.
The anti-trust authorities will also closely look at the TV dominance.
But some lawyers have said that the assessment on the TV side could become easier as another media merger between the India’s Zee Entertainment and Japan’s Sony collapsed this year, leaving more competitors in the market.
Still, lawyers said, Disney-Reliance could face heat on some key TV channel offerings where they together have an outsized market share that is above 40-50 per cent.
THE Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has secured confiscation orders totalling £305,284 from Raheel Mirza, Cameron Vickers and Opeyemi Solaja for their roles in an investment fraud. The orders cover all their remaining assets.
The confiscation proceedings against a fourth defendant, Reuben Akpojaro, have been adjourned.
The FCA said the money will be returned to investors as soon as possible. Failure to pay could lead to imprisonment.
Between June 2016 and January 2020, the defendants cold-called individuals and persuaded them to invest in a shell company.
They claimed to trade client money in binary options, but the funds were used to fund their lifestyles.
In 2023, the four were convicted and sentenced to a combined 24 and a half years.
Steve Smart, executive director, Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said: “We are committed to fighting financial crime, including denying criminals their ill-gotten gains. We’ve already successfully prosecuted these individuals for their part in a scam that conned 120 people out of their money. We’re now seeking to recover as much as we can for victims.”
PETER GLOVER, a long-standing member of the Day Lewis Group, died on 10 May 2025. He was with the company for 37 years, having joined in June 1987 as a pharmacist.
He held several roles, including Group Superintendent Pharmacist, and most recently worked in a Professional Services Advisory role. He was part of the senior management team for decades.
JC Patel, Co-Founder of Day Lewis Group, said: “Peter was much loved and well-known across the pharmacy industry. His contributions to the field were significant and his legacy will be remembered by all who had the privilege of working with him. He leaves behind a lasting impact on Day Lewis and the wider pharmacy community.”
The company extended condolences to his family and friends.
Keep ReadingShow less
Rachel Reeves welcomed the figures, saying they 'show the strength and potential of the UK economy,' while adding that 'there is more to do'. (Photo: Getty Images)
THE UK economy grew more than expected in the first quarter of the year, according to official data published on Thursday. The figures cover the period before business tax increases and US President Donald Trump's new tariffs came into effect.
Gross domestic product rose by 0.7 per cent from January to March, following a small increase in the final quarter of last year, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.
Economists had forecast a rise of 0.6 per cent.
The data comes as a boost for prime minister Keir Starmer and the Labour government, which has faced slow growth since taking office in July.
UK chancellor Rachel Reeves welcomed the figures, saying they "show the strength and potential of the UK economy," while adding that "there is more to do".
However, analysts warned that the growth may not continue.
Thursday's data is from before the business tax hike announced in the Labour government’s first budget last October, which came into effect in April.
It also predates the baseline 10 per cent tariff that Trump imposed on the UK and other countries last month.
"This might be as good as it gets for the year," said Paul Dales, chief UK economist at Capital Economics.
‘Short lived’
The growth is "set to be short lived as tariffs take effect”, said Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG UK.
She said that despite the UK-US trade agreement announced last week, “tariffs on UK exports to the US remain significantly higher than what they were prior to April”.
Under the agreement, tariffs were cut on British cars and removed on steel and aluminium. In return, the UK agreed to open markets to US beef and other agricultural products.
But the 10 per cent baseline tariff remains.
Selfin added that "the indirect impact of trade tensions between the US and the EU will further constrain demand for UK exports".
ONS director of economic statistics Liz McKeown said, "The economy grew strongly in the first quarter of the year, largely driven by services, though production also grew significantly, after a period of decline."
Analysts said production growth may be due to manufacturers rushing to complete exports ahead of the US tariff changes.
Separate trade data released on Thursday showed UK goods exports to the US rose for the fourth straight month in March.
"This pattern of increasing exports could be a sign of changing trader behaviour ahead of tariff introduction," the ONS said.
"Any residual support for manufacturing from front-running will fade from here on, pointing to activity remaining weak for the foreseeable future," said economists at Pantheon Macroeconomics.
The ONS said monthly GDP grew by 0.2 per cent in March, after rising 0.5 per cent in February.
The data follows the Bank of England’s decision last week to cut its key interest rate by a quarter point to 4.25 per cent, as US tariffs begin to affect growth prospects.
The Bank raised its forecast for UK GDP growth in 2025 to 1 per cent, from an earlier estimate of 0.75 per cent, but lowered its projection for 2026 to 1.25 per cent, down from 1.5 per cent.
Earlier this week, data showed UK unemployment in the first quarter had reached its highest level since 2021.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
The company currently manufactures its popular Range Rovers in Solihull, West Midlands
JAGUAR LAND ROVER's chief executive has left open the possibility of building cars in the US as questions remain about the newly announced UK-US trade agreement, reported the Telegraph.
Adrian Mardell said that while there are no immediate plans to shift manufacturing across the Atlantic, he couldn't dismiss the idea completely given the ongoing trade uncertainties.
"We had and currently have no cause to build cars in the US at this time, but we cannot discount that it could be the case at some point," Mardell was quoted as saying.
His comments will worry government officials who are rushing to finalise practical aspects of the trade deal announced last week by prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and US president Donald Trump.
The agreement has reduced tariffs from a potential 27.5 per cent down to 10 per cent for the first 100,000 vehicles exported from the UK to the US. This has already prompted JLR to restart US shipments after previously pausing them.
JLR, owned by India's Tata Motors, currently manufactures its popular Range Rovers in Solihull, West Midlands, while producing models like the Land Rover Discovery and Defender elsewhere in Europe.
North America represents a crucial market for the luxury carmaker, with 129,000 vehicles sold there in the year ending March — roughly a third of its worldwide sales. Most of these sales occurred in the US.
However, car manufacturers are still awaiting key details about how the agreement will work in practice. Bentley's chief executive Frank-Steffen Walliser expressed concerns at a Financial Times conference about the current uncertainty.
"The worst thing that can happen to a running business is the announcement of lower tariff," Walliser explained. "It means all your customers say 'I won't buy a car now', especially our customers, our clients don't need a car at the moment."
He added that the lack of clarity was seriously affecting business: "It is super hard on the business at the moment, nobody's moving."
One major question remains about how the tariff-free quota of 100,000 vehicles will be divided among different car companies.
"Is the 100,000 for Bentley? I can live with that," Walliser remarked. "But I assume our colleagues from JLR would also like to have a chunk."
Bentley, which sells around 4,000 cars annually in the Americas with the US being its largest market, has so far avoided price increases by shipping vehicles to America before tariffs were imposed. However, Walliser warned this strategy was becoming unsustainable as stock levels decreased.
"Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining," he said about the trade deal. "But it is not operational."
Despite these concerns, Starmer has defended the agreement, insisting it "delivers for British business and British workers protecting thousands of British jobs in key sectors including car manufacturing and steel."
Keep ReadingShow less
Trade unionists in front of Arcelor Mittal headquarters in Saint Denis in France on May 13, 2025. (Photo by DANIEL PERRON/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images)
UNIONS in France fighting to save 600 jobs at ArcelorMittal operations in the country called for the government to take control of them, along the lines of what has happened to British Steel.
CGT union chief Sophie Binet promised hundreds of workers demonstrating outside ArcelorMittal's offices of its French subsidiary in France that she would press the issue with president Emmanuel Macron.
"I will deliver to him the CGT proposals to nationalise" the group's French operations, she told the protesting workers.
ArcelorMittal announced plans last month to cut 600 jobs across the seven sites it has in France, from a total workforce in the country of around 7,100 people. It is in the process of negotiating the job reductions with unions.
The group -- the second-biggest steelmaker in the world, formed from a merger of India's Mittal Steel with European company Arcelor -- has warned of industry "uncertainty" after the US imposed 25-per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports.
Yet the group in April posted a quarterly group net profit of $805 million (£633m). To shave costs, it is shifting some support jobs from Europe to India, and last year it suspended a $2 billion (£1.57bn) decarbonisation investment in France.
French unions believe Macron's government can follow the lead of its British counterpart, which last month passed a law allowing it to take control of ailing British Steel.
Italy last year also ousted ArcelorMittal as owner of its debt-ridden ex-Ilva plant, accusing the company of failing to prop up the operation after buying control in 2018.
"The Italians have done it, the British have done it... so why aren't we French able to also do it?" asked a regional CGT head, Gaetan Lecocq.
But a junior French minister for business, Veronique Louwagie, told parliament that "nationalisation is not a response in itself to the difficulties faced by the European steel industry".
She also said, however, that the government expected the company "to give what its mid-term strategy in France is".
A lawmaker with the hard-left France Unbowed party, Aurelie Trouve, has put forward a bill for the nationalisation of ArcelorMittal in France.
Trouve said the company "has clearly been organising the offshoring of production for years, and now we are faced with an emergency".