Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Britain’s rental rules are creating a new problem for tenants, and they don’t even know a solution exists

More landlords are turning to guarantors after new rental rules removed the option of asking tenants for more than one month’s rent in advance

Rental homes

Tenants without family or friends who can act as guarantors could face another hurdle when renting

iStock
  • More than half of landlords are now more likely to ask for a guarantor when tenants fail affordability checks.
  • Half of tenants without access to a guarantor said they would look for a cheaper property, while 16 per cent would stop searching altogether.
  • Yet 74 per cent of tenants surveyed were unaware that professional guarantor services exist.

For renters without family members or friends who can step in financially, finding a home in Britain could be about to get harder.

More than half of landlords surveyed by LRG said they are now more likely to request a guarantor from tenants who do not comfortably meet standard affordability checks.


The shift follows the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act, which prevents landlords from asking for more than one month’s rent in advance. For landlords, that removes a financial safeguard they could previously use when they were concerned about a tenant’s ability to pay.

A guarantor can provide another layer of security, but it also creates a problem for renters who do not have someone able or willing to take on that responsibility.

The people who could be pushed towards cheaper homes

The research found that 28 per cent of landlords had not changed their approach, while 13 per cent said they had always required a guarantor when a tenant failed affordability criteria.

For tenants, however, the consequences could be significant.

Among those without access to a guarantor, 51 per cent said they would look for a cheaper property if a landlord or letting agent asked them for one. Another 16 per cent said they would stop their property search altogether.

That means a requirement designed to reduce risk for landlords could indirectly affect where some tenants can live — or whether they can secure a rental home at all.

The impact could be particularly noticeable for renters without established family support networks, including people moving out on their own or those who cannot rely on relatives to take on financial liability for their tenancy.

Allison Thompson, chief lettings officer at Leaders, said landlords still need confidence that a tenancy is affordable and sustainable, while tenants without family or friends who can act as guarantors should not assume they have no alternatives.

A solution most renters don't know exists

One of those alternatives is a professional guarantor service, which can act in place of a family member or friend.

But awareness remains low.

Only 18 per cent of tenants surveyed said they would consider using a professional guarantor service if family or friends were unavailable, while 74 per cent did not know such services existed.

That creates an unusual situation in the rental market. As landlords look for new ways to manage financial risk, tenants may increasingly need to understand options that were previously unfamiliar to them.

The broader issue is whether the changing rental rules will simply move the affordability test somewhere else.

Removing the ability to demand additional rent upfront may make renting less financially demanding at the point of signing a tenancy. But if more landlords respond by asking for guarantors, some renters could face a different test — whether they have someone behind them who can provide financial backing.

For tenants who do, the change may be little more than another administrative requirement. For those who do not, it could become one more obstacle in an already competitive rental market.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

UK employee

The government is considering changes to apprenticeship funding in England to encourage businesses to train younger workers

Getty Images/iStockphoto

UK plans 25% training cost increase for older apprentices to boost youth hiring

  • Employers could be required to pay 25 per cent of training costs for apprentices aged 25 and over.
  • The proposed change is intended to reverse a 40 per cent decline in youth apprenticeship starts over the past decade.
  • Ministers are considering a phased introduction from September 2027, although the plan has not been finalised.

Employers in England could face higher training costs for older apprentices under government plans to steer more businesses towards hiring and training young people, as ministers try to tackle the youth jobs crisis.

The proposed overhaul of the growth and skills levy would require employers to cover 25 per cent of eligible training costs for apprentices aged 25 and over, while funding would remain available for apprentices aged 16 to 24. The change is being considered as part of the government's response to a review into why so many young people are out of work.

Keep ReadingShow less