Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Barnie Choudhury: Munchetty reversal a victory for common sense

by BARNIE CHOUDHURY

Former BBC journalist


ONE of the most bizarre conversations I had during my career in the BBC was with a very

senior editor who rebuked me for campaigning journalism.

I had been successful in helping to bring in a law against forced marriage, something I had

been reporting about for over a decade. When they learnt that I had been working behind

the scenes for parliament to act against this pernicious crime, I was told I had crossed the

line of ‘due impartiality’. I could report, but I could not get involved, otherwise I would bring the BBC into disrepute. I politely disagreed, and to this day I still do.

That is why I was equally perplexed by the BBC’s findings against the Breakfast presenter, Naga Munchetty. Her colleague, Dan Walker, asked for her opinion on US president Donald Trump’s ‘go back home’ comments. Munchetty said, “Every time I have been told, as a woman of colour, to go back to where I came from, that was embedded in racism. Now I’m not accusing anyone of anything here, but you know what certain phrases mean.”

When pushed by Walker, she added, “And it is not enough to do it just to get attention. He’s in a responsible position. Anyway, I’m not here to give my opinion.”

Applause all around for saying what many of us have faced and feel. But one person complained, and the BBC dug itself a big hole.

As an aside, I have been ‘campaigning’ forever to get BAME people in our profession to

support one another. For the first time, journalists and celebrities of colour rallied to the de-

fence of one of their own. How my heart swelled with pride.

Listening to the BBC’s director of editorial standards, David Jordan, on Radio 4’s Today, I remained unsure why it had chosen its course. “The issue is about when she went on further to discuss president Trump himself, what his motivations were for that, and

that breached our impartiality requirements,” he said. “Because it says quite clearly in our editorial guidelines that our audiences should not be able to tell from the BBC output the personal opinions of our journalists or news and current affairs presenters on matters of public policy, political or industrial controversy.”

I am sure it made complete sense to him, but Jordan’s argument was bewildering.

First, I have yet to find a British Asian who would not react negatively if they were told

to ‘go back’. Looking at Munchetty, no one can be in any doubt about her opinion or her view of the protagonist.

Second, yes, some in the audience have racist views, are racist and will use unacceptable language. But that does not mean the BBC should not call them out.

Third, there are some issues where it is impossible to be impartial. You simply cannot con-

done racism and sit on the fence.

But some key points stand out in the BBC’s editorial guidelines on ‘due impartiality’.

“Due impartiality … does not require absolute neutrality on every issue or detachment

from fundamental democratic principles...”

“We must always scrutinise arguments, question consensus and hold power to account

with consistency and due impartiality.”

Where Jordan made his defence of the ruling was in section 4.3.11: “They (presenters, re-

porters and correspondents) may provide professional judgements, rooted in evidence, but

may not express personal views on such matters publicly, including in any BBC-branded

output or on personal blogs and social media.”

Any half-decent lawyer can ride a coach and horse through this argument. Jordan accepted Munchetty was not wrong to call out president Trump’s comments as racist but argued that she overstepped the mark because she made it personal and criticised the president’s motives.

Hang on a moment. The BBC is not impartial on crime. Editorially, it must make sure that

everyone knows carrying out a crime and being a criminal are wrong. Otherwise why

have programmes such as Crimewatch?

We hold the BBC up to a higher standard because, as licence-fee payers, we are invested

financially and emotionally. Thankfully, the BBC’s director-general personally intervened,

and exercised much-needed leadership and common sense.

“It was only ever in a limited way that there was found to be a breach of our guidelines,” he

wrote in an email to staff. “These are often finely balanced and difficult judgements. But,

in this instance, I don’t think Naga’s words were sufficient to merit a partial uphold of the complaint around the comments she made. There was never any sanction against Naga.”

We expect the BBC to reflect the views of the nation. Perhaps presenters, reporters and correspondents like Munchetty, can now ‘hold power to account’, without fearing the consequences.

More For You

Sri Aurobindo

Heehs’s biography is grounded in extensive archival research across France, England, India and Israel

AMG

Sri Aurobindo and the rise of the Asian century

Dinesh Sharma

My friend and colleague, the American historian Peter Heehs, who has lived in Pondicherry, India, for decades, recently published a compelling new biography, The Mother: A Life of Sri Aurobindo’s Collaborator (2025). Heehs previously authored The Lives of Sri Aurobindo (2008), which remains one of the most balanced and scholarly accounts of Aurobindo’s life.

According to Heehs, most previous biographies of the Mother were written for devotees and relied on secondary sources, often presenting her as a divine incarnation without critical engagement. “Such biographies are fine for those who see the Mother as a divine being,” Heehs said, “but they can be off-putting for readers who simply want to understand her life – as an artist, writer, spiritual teacher, and founder of the Ashram and Auroville.”

Keep ReadingShow less
INSET Hatul Shah Sigma conference chair

Hatul Shah

Showing up with purpose: Lessons in leadership and legacy

Hatul Shah

Last week, I had the privilege of speaking at the Circles of Connections event hosted by the Society of Jainism and Entrepreneurship at Imperial College London. The event was organised by Yash Shah and Hrutika S., and generously sponsored by Koolesh Shah and the London Town Group, with support from Nikhil Shah, Priyanka Mehta, and Ambika Mehta.

The experience reminded me that leadership isn’t just about vision or results — it’s about how you show up, and why you do what you do.

Keep ReadingShow less
Aspirations ignited following Leicester schools Parliament visit

Aspirations ignited following Leicester schools Parliament visit

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE DL

Delighted to pause and look back on a pioneering partnership project, which saw our Randal Charitable Foundation, Leicestershire Police and the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) support pupils, from 5 Leicester schools, tour London and the Houses of Parliament with the aim to help raise aspirations and demonstrate possible future career paths.

With more young people than ever struggling to stay in education, find employment and track down career opportunities, I’ve reflected on the importance of collaborations like this one, which model just one way in that small interventions could reap rewards in the life course of youngsters.

Keep ReadingShow less
Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less