PAKISTANI ACTRESS ANAM TANVEER ON WHY SHE WANTS TO AVOID BEING TYPECAST
by ASJAD NAZIR
THE past decade has seen talented Pakistani actress Anam Tanveer deliver powerful performances in a wide array of projects that have shown off her perfect range.
The hardworking actress has taken on challenging roles in small-screen serials that range from a superb sitcom to hard-hitting emotional dramas. The multi-talented star is also a popular host and accomplished writer, but remains most in demand for her acting prowess.
Eastern Eye caught up with Anam Tanveer to talk about her interesting acting journey, life in lockdown and future plans.
How have you coped with lockdown?
Before lockdown I used to get up at 8am for gym and then reach work by 10ish. With the lockdown, I was kind of glad to have the opportunity to sleep till 12 noon. Of course, I didn’t give up working-out since I used to get together with a set number of close friends to continue my exercise regime. At home, I reconnected with lots of people and spent time dancing to keep myself in shape. Too bad the downtime was short-lived as I had to resume shooting within a few weeks only.
What first connected you to acting?
I initially wanted to be a model, but as I was not size-zero, I was advised to go into acting, so you can say it was entirely accidental. However, it turned out to be a blessing in disguise because I genuinely enjoyed getting into various characters, whether positive or negative.
Which of your roles are closest to your heart?
I loved playing Fareeha in Do Bol and Shaheena of Mera Dil Mera Dushman because I poured my heart into them. I enjoy scenes where there’s a lot of interaction between the characters. Monologues are not my thing.
Which has been the most challenging character you have portrayed?
Every role is a challenge because making it appear realistic is half the battle. So, if I am playing a dorky role and people consider me an actual dork – that’s a win for sure.
Who have you enjoyed working with the most?
Hassan Ahmed was an absolute joy to work with. While I was shooting Jalebi for ARY, he taught me Punjabi and was a true mentor. Kashif Nisar is another director with whom I had a wonderful time while shooting Lashkara. I was playing a nerd and he helped me get in character. Ushna Shah was my co-star on the show, and she’s so much fun to be around. Other than that, director Wajahat Hussain from Do Bol is someone I’d love to work with again.
How are you choosing projects today?
This is a concern for me because I don’t want to be typecast. There’s a dearth of roles and we should experiment with our storyline and scripts as an industry – something we are not doing right now. I have to give credit to our neighbours (India) for getting rid of formula work. A lot of people say our audience is not ready for unconventional work, but I don’t agree with that. That is a simplistic view of our people and doesn’t hold any substance I feel.
What do you mean?
Do we really want to be putting out the same work 20 years from now? I was absolutely fascinated with Rani Mukerji’s character as a police officer in Mardaani. But Rubina Ashraf (whom I consider a powerhouse of talent) played the same role in the famous Pas-e Aaina more than a decade ago. Not only did she nail it, but the drama series was also progressive even for present times and popular too. So, what happened to us? If actors are given challenging roles, they will not disappoint. Right now, they don’t have a choice but to go along with what is being offered and you can’t blame them – we all have to pay bills, right?
What are you working on now?
Shehnai is a drama for ARY. I’m not going to go into details, but it’s a feel-good drama. I’m not playing a negative role, so I think people will be happy to see me in this one.
How do you approach new characters and make them unique?
I study the script and put myself in the character’s shoes to understand her point of view and where she is coming from. I also watch characters in a similar capacity so I can do better.
What do you enjoy watching?
I enjoy comedies. I am also a sucker for rom-coms. Currently, I am binging on Crazy Ex-Girlfriend on Netflix.
What are your future plans?
I really want to diversify in terms of role. Perhaps, be part of an action thriller. I work out regularly, so I am in shape for a role like that. Maybe an unconventional part that I haven’t done before and push the boundaries.
Is there anything new you would like to master?
I would like to master the art of patience. I sometimes, mostly lack it, and that has put me in a couple of undesirable situations. I also want to do kickboxing and dancing. I am not a pro, so I would like to learn and maybe do the latter professionally.
What is the best advice you ever got?
If you want to pursue acting as a career, focus on acting. How pretty you look doesn’t matter because the audience will remember your character, not your looks. A pretty face with bad acting may fail, but an ugly face with authentic acting can’t.
What inspires you?
People with a larger-than-life vision, always up for helping others, especially those who manage to live in the moment. God knows how hard it can be with our chaotic and all-over-the-place lifestyle.
US president Donald Trump gestures next to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ben Gurion International Airport as Trump leaves Israel en route to Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, to attend a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a US-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Lod, Israel, October 13, 2025.
‘They make a desert and call it peace’, wrote the Roman historian Tacitus. That was an early exercise, back in AD 96, of trying to walk in somebody else’s shoes. The historian was himself the son-in-law of the Roman Governor of Britain, yet he here imagined the rousing speech of a Caledonian chieftain to give voice to the opposition to that imperial conquest.
Nearly two thousand years later, US president Donald Trump this week headed to Sharm-El-Sheikh in the desert, to join the Egyptian, Turkish and Qatari mediators of the Gaza ceasefire. Twenty more world leaders, including prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and president Emmanuel Macron of France turned up too to witness this ceremonial declaration of peace in Gaza.
This ceasefire brings relief after two years of devastating pain. Tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. More of the Israeli hostages taken by Hamas are returning dead than alive. Eighty-five per cent of Gaza is rubble. Each of the twenty steps of the proposed peace plan may prove rocky. The state of Palestine has more recognition - in principle - than ever before across the international community, but it may be a long road to that taking practical form. Israel continues to oppose a Palestinian state.
The ceasefire will be welcomed in Britain for humanitarian relief and rekindling hopes of a path to a political settlement. It offers an opportunity to take stock on the fissures of the last two years on community relations here in Britain too. That was the theme of a powerful cross-faith conversation last week, convened by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to reciprocate the expressions of solidarity received from Muslims, Christians and others after the Manchester synagogue attacks, and challenge the arson attack on a Sussex mosque.
Jewish and Muslim civic voices had convened an ‘optimistic alliance’ to keep conversations going when there seemed ever less to be optimistic about. The emerging news from Gaza was seen as a hopeful basis to deepen conversation in Britain about how tackling the causes of both antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice could form part of a shared commitment to cohesion.
This conflict has not seen a Brexit-style polarisation down the middle of British society. Most people’s first instinct was to avoid choosing a side in this conflict. The murderous Hamas attack on Jews on October 7, 2023 and the excesses of the Israeli assault on Gaza piled tragedy upon tragedy. The instinct to not take sides can be an expression of mutual empathy, but is not always so noble. It can reflect confusion and exhaustion with this seemingly intractable conflict. A tendency to look away and change the subject can frustrate those whose family heritage, faith solidarity or commitments to Zionism and Palestine as political ideas make them feel more closely connected.
Others have felt this conflict thrust upon them in an unwelcome way - including British Jews fed up with the antisemitic idea that they can be held responsible at school, university or work for what the government of Israel is doing. Protesters for Palestine perceive double standards in arguments about free speech - as do those with contrasting views. The proper boundaries between legitimate political protest and prejudice are sharply contested.
Hamit Coksun is an asylum seeker who speaks somewhat broken English. He would seem an unusual ally for Robert Jenrick. Yet the shadow justice secretary went to court to offer solidarity, after Coskun had burned a Qu’ran outside the Turkish Embassy, while shouting “F__ Islam” and “Islam is the religion of terrorism”. He had been fined £250, but the appeal court overturned his conviction. The judgment was context-specific: this specific incendiary protest took place outside an embassy, not a place of worship, in an empty street, and did not direct the comments at anybody in particular.
The law does not protect faiths from criticism, and indeed offers some protection for intolerant and prejudiced political speech too, though the police can place conditions on protest to protect people from abuse, intimidation or harassment on the basis of their faith.
So it can be legal to performatively burn books - holy or otherwise - though this verdict makes clear it does not offer a green light to do so in every context.
But how far should we celebrate those who choose to burn books? Cosun advocates banning the Qu’ran, making him a flawed champion of free speech. Jenrick is legitimately concerned to show that there are no laws against blasphemy in Britain, but could anybody imagine that he would turn up in person to show solidarity to a man burning the Bible, Bhagvad Gita or Torah, shouting profanities to declaring religion of war or genocide? The court’s defence of the right to shock, offend and provoke is correct in law. Those are hardly the only conversations that a shared society needs.
Sunder Katwalawww.easterneye.biz
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.