Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

'Act Early to Prevent radicalisation of young people'

By Akeela Ahmed

As a parent, I know how the easy availability of phones and social media has made it so much harder to keep track of what our children are going through. Add the impact of lockdowns, missed time at school and people who want to exploit young people’s vulnerabilities with conspiracy theories and divisive narratives, and it’s an even more stressful time for parents.


So, I can understand why the country’s most senior officer of colour and the head of counter terrorism policing Neil Basu has asked parents to be more vigilant for signs of their children becoming prey to radicalisation or other online harms. He is launching a new campaign called “Act Early” aimed at tackling terrorism in its early stages, which is part of the Prevent programme.

I have had serious concerns about the structure of Prevent and how the Prevent duty has been implemented - and I hope that the independent review of the programme will help address some of these issues. In the early days of Prevent, a lack of transparency and a disproportionate focus on ethnic minority communities and British Muslims especially fuelled such concerns. There still remains much more to be done to address issues around Islamophobia and Anti-Muslim Hatred, as well as wider issues around prejudice, discrimination and integration.

I will continue to challenge the government on that. But I also recognise the need for a programme such as Prevent and the importance of communities supporting this new campaign.

Firstly, because this campaign is about all forms of radicalisation and aimed at all communities. That’s the right approach because we know that the threat of terrorism can come from any form of extremism. And the rise of right wing terrorism in recent years has been the biggest growing threat. Community confidence increases when people are assured that it is not just one community or minority being singled out.

I am glad to know that the police are taking right wing extremism seriously as I know how much minority communities, and particularly women, are living in fear of harassment, hate crimes and worse. I am also concerned about extremism in our own communities. Though carried out by a tiny minority and not at all representative of who we are, it is real and can have the most terrible consequences, as we are currently reminded when we hear the tragic testimony at the Manchester Arena Inquiry.

Secondly, there has never been enough transparency and communication about Prevent, nor has there been enough acknowledgement of the concerns of communities. Understanding the signs of radicalisation and how these might differ from other issues such as mental health illnesses is not easy. Public knowledge of what to look out for and where to go for help is actually very low. Polling research from ComRes and Crest Advisory that I was involved in advising shows that 68 per cent of the public and 55 per cent of British Muslims have never heard of the Prevent programme.

So it is not surprising that only 3 per cent of all referrals into the Prevent programme come directly from communities.

Yet it is friends and families who will often be the first to notice when something is going wrong in someone’s life. Of course it might not be extremist radicalisation that is causing people to behave differently or worryingly. The important thing is to find out what it is and get them the right help if they need it. So if this new initiative can help get more people more help earlier, especially when they might not have access to the usual mechanisms of support for instance at school or at their GP, then I will support it.

Finally, to help tackle potential barriers to accessing help, I have also been calling for more transparency around the Prevent programme, specifically about what it means longterm for someone if they have been referred to Prevent but did not require an intervention. So I welcome too that this new website will be a single easy place to answer the public’s questions about what Prevent does and doesn’t do. Building confidence among communities about what is done to keep the country safe requires honesty from everyone.

In an ideal world there would be no need for Prevent. The best recourse to deal with issues of extremism would be a bottom up approach in which communities led initiatives like this without need for police intervention. But the recent attacks in France, Austria and earlier in the UK, prove that communities need to work together with the authorities as equal partners in keeping the public safe.

Getting people help early to try and stop problems getting worse is a principle applied in the areas of drugs, mental health, youth offending and safeguarding. It is even more important during the pandemic when people have reduced access to support. Early intervention, if done correctly and appropriately shouldn’t be controversial.

I will continue to challenge politicians and senior police officers where I think they are going wrong. But I am also worried about the threat posed by extremists to communities, and so I call on everyone to come together and do everything we can in our power to stop them, For some, that includes getting professional support and advice early on, even if it feels uncomfortable. ‘Act Early’ should help with that

and make the process easier.

(Akeela Ahmed is a member of the Counter Terrorism Police Advisory Network and Chair of the Independent members of the Government’s Anti-Muslim Hatred Working Group)

More For You

UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less