Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Using ‘cancel culture’ as a tactic in politics

Using ‘cancel culture’ as a tactic in politics

EVERYONE knows that the easiest way to win an election is to “encourage” the opposition candidate to stand down.

In Pakistan, Imran Khan has been cancelled by the army. He should have known those who live by the army die by the army.


He has been given a three-year jail sentence, allegedly for flogging state gifts. This seems like a trick to ensure he does not stand in the forthcoming general election. At least, he is luckier than Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who was hanged by General Zia-ul Haq.

The first time I came across this practice of disqualifying the opposition was in Iran. An organisation, called “the Guardian Council”, controlled by the country’s supreme leader (first, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and then Ali Hosseini Khamenei), vetted the candidates’ list and simply crossed out those deemed insufficiently “Islamic”.

In India, the Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was disqualified as an MP and rendered ineligible to stand in next year’s general election after a court in Gujarat gave him a two-year prison term for saying rude things about Narendra Modi’s surname.

LEAD Amit 1 Rahul Gandhi Rahul Gandhi

Last week the Supreme Court suspended his conviction, so it’s possible he will be able to fight in the 2024 election, after all.

Meanwhile, in Russia, Alexei Navalny, considered president Vladimir Putin’s principal adversary, has had his jail term extended to 19 years.

Many people think that the former US president Donald Trump should be in jail, but the more indictments he gets, the more popular he seems to become with his Republican supporters.

But then American democracy and the way the country elects its president defy logic.

Each of these cases – Imran, Rahul, Navalny and Trump – is different, but what is going on in Pakistan is of particular concern to British Asians.

Last weekend, the Sunday Times (6) called Pakistan “one of the most dangerous, violent and corrupt countries on earth”.

The irony of Imran’s predicament is he is no democrat. He was soft on the Taliban and used the army to get to power.

The real problem is 76 years after Muhammad Ali Jinnah forced the partition of India and demanded a safe homeland for Muslims, the military are entrenched in Pakistan. This is not the country Jinnah had envisaged. Even in Africa, the army has been told to return to barracks after the coup in Niger by other countries on the continent. But no one seems capable of doing the same in Pakistan.

And that is the cancer that needs to be cut out.

More For You

From Budapest to Washington: What Orbán’s Defeat Means for the West

Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban reacts as he speaks to voters at an election campaign rally two days before parliamentary elections on April 10, 2026 in Szekesfehervar, Hungary.

Getty Images

From Budapest to Washington: What Orbán’s Defeat Means for the West

Sunder Katwala

The Budapest crowds celebrating Viktor Orban’s defeat after 16 years in power in Hungary seemed to evoke more the euphoric spirit of the East European regime changes of 1989 rather than a general election result.

Yet 1989 had been the year of hope in which Orban himself burst onto the Hungarian political scene. He began as a young democrat, who fused anti-Communism with an appeal to Hungarian pride in the memory of the democratic uprising of 1956, crushed by Soviet tanks. Could that young Orban - who once led crowds chanting “Russians go home” have imagined he would travel so far to become Vladimir Putin’s chief autocratic ally in Europe, so that the same “Russians go home” chant now rang out to celebrate his demise, as new prime minister Peter Magyar made his victory speech. There was, at least, relief at Orban’s rapid concession, recognising his landslide defeat.

Keep ReadingShow less