Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

UK’s SFO drop investigations on Rolls-Royce, GSK

BRITAIN'S Serious Fraud Office (SFO) today (22) dropped major investigations into engineering firm Rolls-Royce and pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

Rolls Royce had already reached a £500 million agreement with the SFO over claims that corruption and bribery were used to win business in China, India, Indonesia, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria and Malaysia.


The SFO said it had now concluded that there would be "no prosecution of individuals associated with the company".

The investigation into GlaxoSmithKline related to commercial practices by the firm, its subsidiaries and associated individuals.

"After an extensive and careful examination I have concluded that there is either insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction or it is not in the public interest to bring a prosecution in these cases," said SFO director Lisa Osofsky. 

"In the Rolls-Royce case, the SFO investigation led to the company taking responsibility for corrupt conduct spanning three decades, seven jurisdictions and three businesses, for which it paid a fine of £497.25m."

This figure, agreed in January 2017 as part of a so-called deferred prosecution agreement, comprised surrendered profits of £258m and a financial penalty of £239m.

Rolls-Royce is also paying an estimated £13m to cover the SFO's costs.

The firm said it would not be commenting on today’s decision, beyond saying it was cooperating fully with the authorities following the 2017 deal.

In a statement, businessmen Sudhir Choudhrie and his son Bhanu Choudhrie said: "We are delighted to have been informed that the Serious Fraud Office has dropped its investigation into Rolls Royce and any individuals connected to it.

"We have always maintained our innocence and today's announcement vindicates us.

"For five long years we have had this hanging over us and it has had a huge impact on us, on our families and on our business interests.

"We now look forward to getting on with the rest of our lives with our reputations intact".

(AFP)

More For You

Amazon

How Amazon allegedly used Levi’s and Hanes to push rivals to raise prices

iStock

How Amazon allegedly used Levi’s and Hanes to push rivals to raise prices

  • Court filing alleges Amazon used brands to influence rival pricing
  • Levi’s and Hanes cited in internal exchanges over price hikes
  • Case adds to growing regulatory pressure on Amazon in the US

Fresh details from a California antitrust lawsuit against Amazon are shedding light on how the company may have handled pricing behind the scenes. Newly unsealed court documents suggest Amazon pressured major brands to intervene with rival retailers when prices dropped elsewhere, raising fresh concerns around Amazon price fixing and competition in online retail.

The filings, part of an ongoing case led by Rob Bonta, offer a closer look at what regulators describe as a structured approach to keeping prices in check across platforms. The case, first filed in 2022, is expected to go to trial in 2027.

Keep ReadingShow less