Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

UK expects trade advantage to hold after US Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs

Officials signal confidence despite uncertainty over existing trade carve-outs

UK-trade-deal
UK expects trade advantage to hold after US Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs
iStock
  • US Supreme Court ruling overturns Trump’s reciprocal tariffs.
  • UK officials expect trade advantages with US to continue.
  • Businesses warn uncertainty around future tariff policy remains.

The UK Government expects its trade advantage with the US to remain intact after the US Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, a decision that has raised fresh questions about the future of existing trade arrangements. The ruling, which challenges a key part of US trade policy, is being closely watched by businesses concerned about US tariffs and UK trade relations.

Ministers signalled confidence that Britain’s relatively favourable position — including lower tariff exposure — will continue, even as officials assess the potential impact on existing sector-specific deals covering steel, cars and pharmaceuticals.


Trump’s tariffs, introduced last April under emergency powers and applied to most countries, were overturned by the US Supreme Court in a major setback to the president’s economic agenda. The UK had faced the lowest tariff rate at 10 per cent, with subsequent agreements between Sir Keir Starmer and Trump providing additional carve-outs for key industries.

The court ruling raises uncertainty over whether those arrangements still stand, although officials reportedly believe most UK trade flows with America will remain unaffected.

A Government spokesman reportedly said, as quoted in a news report, that the matter is for the US to determine but that the UK will continue supporting businesses as more details emerge. The spokesman added that Britain enjoys the lowest reciprocal tariffs globally and expects its privileged trading position with the US to continue under any scenario.

Business groups urge caution

The US has collected more than £98.4 billion ($133 billion) since the tariffs were introduced and now faces the possibility of refunding importers following the ruling. The decision, passed by a 6–3 majority, found that a 1977 law did not give the president authority to impose tariffs without approval from Congress.

Speaking to reporters in Scotland, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch reportedly said she was pleased with the decision, noting that tariffs increase costs for consumers on both sides and expressing hope that the ruling holds.

Business groups suggested the decision does little to remove uncertainty. William Bain, head of trade policy at the British Chambers of Commerce, reportedly said the ruling does not fully clarify the outlook and warned that Trump could still use other legislation to reintroduce tariffs. He added that the UK’s priority should remain reducing tariffs wherever possible, particularly on steel and aluminium.

Campaign group Best for Britain reportedly said the decision highlights the instability of relying on trade deals with the US and underscores the importance of strengthening trade ties with European neighbours.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Michael O’Leary

Ryanair chief Michael O’Leary has defended his comments and refused to apologise.

Getty Images

Michael O’Leary got the headline he wanted, but what did it cost Ryanair?

  • Michael O’Leary has rejected calls to apologise for describing rival airlines as “high-fare rapists”.
  • Dublin Rape Crisis Centre said survivors had been upset and distressed by the comments.
  • The Ryanair chief has defended his language while continuing his attacks on competitors and the UK air traffic control system.

Michael O’Leary has refused to apologise after using the word “rapists” to describe rival airlines, despite criticism from rape crisis organisations and politicians in both Ireland and the UK.

The Ryanair chief made the comments ahead of the airline’s annual general meeting in Dublin, arguing that passengers facing higher fares at airlines including Aer Lingus, Lufthansa and British Airways would turn to Ryanair instead.

Keep ReadingShow less