Pramod Thomas is a senior correspondent with Asian Media Group since 2020, bringing 19 years of journalism experience across business, politics, sports, communities, and international relations. His career spans both traditional and digital media platforms, with eight years specifically focused on digital journalism. This blend of experience positions him well to navigate the evolving media landscape and deliver content across various formats. He has worked with national and international media organisations, giving him a broad perspective on global news trends and reporting standards.
THE government is preparing to take control of Liberty Steel’s South Yorkshire factories if their owner, businessman Sanjeev Gupta, fails to secure a last-minute rescue deal.
The move could save around 1,500 jobs at Speciality Steel UK, which includes steelworks in Rotherham and Stocksbridge.
At a High Court hearing on Wednesday (20), it was revealed that the government’s official receiver is ready to step in as administrator if the company goes into compulsory liquidation. Speciality Steel is facing closure after struggling for years under mounting debts and a lack of funding.
The court heard that the company has only £650,000 in its bank account but needs around £4 million each month just to pay wages. Lawyers representing creditors are pushing for the company to be wound up so its assets can be sold to repay debts. Creditors include major banks, suppliers, and Walsall Borough Council.
Sanjeev Gupta, the head of the GFG Alliance, is trying to avoid a government takeover. His lawyers asked the court to delay any decision, saying he is close to finalising a £75m funding deal with US investment giant BlackRock.
The plan would involve a “pre-pack” administration, allowing Gupta to buy back the company through a management buyout. The process is being advised by restructuring firm Begbies Traynor.
Gupta’s team argued that this commercial solution, backed by private investment, would protect jobs, keep the steelworks running, and come at no cost to UK taxpayers.
A spokesperson for Liberty Steel said, “We continue to believe our commercial solution, backed by major private capital, provides the best outcome for the business, its employees and all stakeholders concerned, without cost to UK taxpayers or unnecessary uncertainty.”
Judge Sally Barber said she could not make an immediate decision and needed more information about the next steps. She warned against acting “on a completely blind basis” and adjourned the case to give time to consider all options.
The Department for Business and Trade confirmed in a letter to creditors that the Government is ready to act.
“The official receiver is prepared, should SSUK enter into compulsory liquidation, to take control of SSUK’s affairs,” the letter said.
The government stressed that no final decision had been made to take the company into state ownership. Any such move would require ministerial approval. However, officials confirmed they had already been contacted by third parties interested in restarting steel production at the sites.
This would be the second government intervention in the UK steel industry this year. In April, ministers took control of British Steel’s plant in Scunthorpe, which was losing £250m annually. Last year, the government also gave Tata Steel a £500m support package to develop a greener electric arc furnace in Wales.
Liberty Steel’s Rotherham site hosts the UK’s largest electric arc furnace, which uses recycled scrap metal. The plant has not produced steel for about a year due to cash shortages, but workers have continued to be paid.
The problems began after the collapse of Greensill Capital in 2021, which had provided billions in loans to Gupta’s businesses. Investigations by the Serious Fraud Office into the GFG Alliance over suspected fraud and money laundering have also made fundraising more difficult.
Citibank alone is reportedly owed £233m by Speciality Steel. The creditors claim that allowing Gupta to retain control would write off most debts, and they prefer a government-led liquidation process that could offer a better chance to recover funds.
Judge Barber has referred the case to a different court, which is expected to make a final decision in the coming days, reports said.
Veterinary practices ordered to publish price lists and disclose corporate ownership under new CMA proposals.
Pet healthcare costs have risen at nearly twice the rate of inflation, investigation finds.
CVS Group shares surge 18 per cent as market welcomes lack of direct price controls on medicines.
Watchdog pushes for price transparency
Britain’s competition watchdog has provisionally ordered veterinary practices to publish price lists and disclose corporate ownership, aiming to give pet owners greater transparency in a sector where costs have risen at nearly twice the rate of inflation.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said on Wednesday (15) that pet owners are often unaware of prices or not given estimates for treatments that can run into thousands of pounds.
Under the proposed measures, vet businesses must publish prices for common procedures and make clear which practices are independent and which belong to large corporate chains. The watchdog also plans to cap prescription fees and ban bonuses linked to specific treatments.
“We believe that the measures we are proposing would be beneficial to the sector as a whole, including vets and vet nurses,” the CMA stated in its provisional decision report. “Providing better information for pet owners will increase their confidence in vet businesses and the profession.”
Industry reactions
The announcement triggered immediate market reactions. Bloomberg reported Shares of CVS Group, a British veterinary services provider, rose as much as 18 per cent in early London trading before paring gains, whilst Pets at Home traded up to 4.9 per cent higher. Both companies had underperformed since the CMA launched its investigation.
“While the tone of the CMA’s report is sharp, we see few surprises versus our expectations,” said Jefferies analyst Andrew Wade to Bloomberg. “The lack of pricing controls on services notably medicines must be viewed as a positive.”
The veterinary profession offered cautious support for the reforms. Dr Rob Williams, president of the British Veterinary Association, said: “At first glance, there’s lots of positives in the CMA’s provisional decision that both vets and pet owners will welcome, including greater transparency of pricing and practice ownership."
However, animal welfare charities warned of the consequences when pet owners delay treatment due to cost concerns. Caroline Allen, the RSPCA’s Chief Veterinary Officer, told BBC “Our frontline officers sadly see first-hand the consequences when people delay or avoid seeking professional help, or even attempt to treat conditions themselves."
The proposed remedies package also includes requirements for vet businesses to improve complaint processes and conduct regular customer satisfaction surveys comparing large groups with independent practices. Additionally, practices would find it easier to terminate out-of-hours contracts with third-party providers if better alternatives exist.
The CMA emphasised that vet businesses failing to comply, or those pressuring veterinarians to act in certain ways or sell specific treatments, could be in breach of the Order.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.