Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Treating all minorities as a homogenous group is a mistake’

By Amit Roy

DURING the current pandemic, what more can be done to save the lives of British Asians?


The government has finally rec­ognised there is a disproportionate number of deaths from coronavirus among ethnic minorities. It has asked Prof Kevin Fenton, regional director of public health at PHE (Public Health England) and NHS London, to conduct an urgent in­quiry, whose initial findings will be published by the end of this month.

“PHE is rapidly building robust data and undertaking detailed analysis to develop our understanding of the impact of this coronavi­rus on different groups which can inform actions to mitigate the risks it presents,” Fenton said.

Meanwhile, prime minister Boris Johnson is being pressed to launch an “independent public inquiry” in a letter from 50 signatories, made up of celebrities, medics, and coun­cil, union and church leaders, in­cluding broadcaster Konnie Huq, writer and broadcaster Afua Hirsch, the mayors of Newham and Bristol, and the bishops of Southwark, Barking and Liverpool.

Maybe these are necessary exer­cises, but some urgent steps need to be taken now to save lives that might otherwise be lost.

It is certainly a mistake to treat the ethnic minorities as a homoge­nous group. This virus seems to af­fect black people and Asians in dif­ferent ways. There are even differ­ences between Pakistanis and Bangladeshis on one hand, and Indians on the other. The need of the hour is culturally specific advice on top of the new slogan, “Stay alert, control the virus, save lives”, which is re­placing “Stay at home, protect the NHS, save lives” in England.

Eastern Eye, which I believe was the first publication to point out there was a problem, could perhaps join experienced Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi doctors in helping the government formulate a cam­paign that is targeted at the British Asian community.

More For You

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar speaks to media infront of the party’s Ad Van Campaign on May 04, 2026 in Bathgate, Scotland

Getty Images

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Sunder Katwala

The tremors of the May 2026 elections could shift the tectonic plates of British politics. Attention will quickly turn to the Westminster aftershocks, including what the fallout of these national elections in Scotland and Wales alongside local elections across much of England, mean for Sir Keir Starmer’s future. Yet these seismic electoral upheavals merit scrutiny in their own right.

Wales is set for a once a century political earthquake. Labour has not just led the Welsh government since devolution began in 1999 - but won the most votes in every national election in Wales since 1922. Yet it now trails third, burdened by double incumbency in Cardiff Bay and Westminster, with the party watching the Welsh nationalists of Plaid Cymru and Reform’s pro-Brexit populists compete to top the polls. That contrast has polarised Wales - by age and geography - though a broad majority would prefer a government led by Plaid Cymru’s Rhun Ap Iowerth, with two-thirds hoping to keep Reform out.

Scotland could offer a rare pocket of political stability. John Swinney is the third Scottish first minister of a turbulent term after Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf, but may now secure a fifth term for his Scottish National Party. The trick to bucking the anti-incumbent trend has been to leverage his Edinburgh government being comparatively less unpopular than its London counterpart. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar sought to demonstrate his own distance from Westminster by calling for Starmer to resign, but his bid to lead Scotland, and become its second Asian First Minister, looks set to fall short.

Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap IorwerthGetty Images

Keep ReadingShow less