Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘The British live in denial about their past’: Netizens school British historian who criticised RRR for casting Britishers as villains

‘It does not record the nastiness of 1920s British rule, but it does reflect the growing nastiness of today's India,’ the historian wrote in a review.

‘The British live in denial about their past’: Netizens school British historian who criticised RRR for casting Britishers as villains

Helmed by visionary Indian filmmaker SS Rajamouli, RRR has emerged as one of the most loved Indian films ever made. Ever since its premiere on Netflix after a great run in cinemas, fans, filmmakers, and screenwriters from all across the world have been heaping praises on the lavishly mounted film. It holds the record of the most-watched Indian film on Netflix.

While the world is falling short of words for praising the film, there is a British historian who is criticising the film and Netflix for promoting it. Robert Tombs, who is an author and emeritus professor in history at the University of Cambridge, has said RRR, set against the backdrop of colonial India in the 1920s, is filled with exaggerations about British rule.


“It does not record the nastiness of 1920s British rule, but it does reflect the growing nastiness of today’s India,” he wrote in a derisive review on The Spectator.

“To portray British officials and soldiers roaming the country casually committing crimes is a sign of absolute ignorance or of deliberate dishonesty,” Tombs writes in his review.

He goes on to add that RRR depicts the English as the villains in ‘nationalist myths’ as an excuse for former colonies to ‘make up heroic stories about themselves’.

“We (British) have played such an important role in the world over the last few centuries that we have accumulated enemies as well as friends. In many nationalist myths, we are cast in the role of villains. It’s a way that quite a few countries make up heroic stories about themselves.

“That is no reason why we should accept these stories as true, or start apologising for things that did not happen.”

His views have elicited strong reactions. Dr. Lavanya Vemsani, a professor of history at the Shawnee State University in Ohio, who specialises in Indian history and religions, took to Twitter to express her views.

“Needless to say, fans of the film #BritishBabu is upset that his nostalgia is being disturbed & Indians are awakening to the truth. Colonialist administration oppressed India in many ways, denying it is a crime,” she wrote.

“I read this so you didn’t have to and I can tell you: this entire white boy is in deep denial,” a user wrote on Twitter.

Keep visiting this space over and again for more updates and reveals from the world of entertainment.

More For You

porn ban

Britain moves to ban porn showing sexual strangulation

AI Generated Gemini

What Britain’s ban on strangulation porn really means and why campaigners say it could backfire

Highlights:

  • Government to criminalise porn that shows strangulation or suffocation during sex.
  • Part of wider plan to fight violence against women and online harm.
  • Tech firms will be forced to block such content or face heavy Ofcom fines.
  • Experts say the ban responds to medical evidence and years of campaigning.

You see it everywhere now. In mainstream pornography, a man’s hands around a woman’s neck. It has become so common that for many, especially the young, it just seems like part of sex, a normal step. The UK government has decided it should not be, and soon, it will be a crime.

The plan is to make possessing or distributing pornographic material that shows sexual strangulation, often called ‘choking’, illegal. This is a specific amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill. Ministers are acting on the back of a stark, independent review. That report found this kind of violence is not just available online, but it is rampant. It has quietly, steadily, become normalised.

Keep ReadingShow less