Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of woman means biological sex

uk-supreme-court

Susan Smith (L) and Marion Calder, directors of 'For Women Scotland' cheer as they leave the Supreme Court on April 16, 2025 in London.

Getty Images

THE UNITED KINGDOM's Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the term "woman" in equality legislation refers to biological sex. However, the court said the ruling would not disadvantage transgender people.

The case centred on whether a transgender woman with a gender recognition certificate is considered a woman under the Equality Act and protected from discrimination on that basis.


Campaign group For Women Scotland brought the case, arguing that rights under the Equality Act should be based on biological sex.

The group had challenged guidance issued by the Scottish government related to a 2018 law aimed at increasing the number of women on public sector boards.

The guidance stated that a transgender woman with a gender recognition certificate is legally a woman.

For Women Scotland initially lost in the Scottish courts. However, the Supreme Court ruled in the group's favour following an appeal last November. Supporters were seen cheering outside the court after the judgment.

"The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms 'women' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex," said deputy president of the Supreme Court Patrick Hodge.

"But we counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph for one or more groups in our society at the expense of another – it is not," he said.

Critics of the Scottish guidance argued that its definition could affect single-sex services for women, including refuges, hospital wards, and sports.

Transgender campaigners warned that a ruling in favour of For Women Scotland could lead to discrimination against those with gender recognition certificates, especially in employment.

"The correct interpretation of the EA (Equality Act) as referring to biological sex does not cause disadvantage to trans people, whether or not they possess a gender recognition certificate," Hodge said.

"Trans people have the rights which attach to the protected characteristic of gender reassignment."

In the United States, legal challenges are underway after president Donald Trump issued executive orders that include a ban on transgender people serving in the military.

(With inputs from Reuters)

More For You

Indian-origin oncologist struck off UK register after fleeing country mid-trial

Shamir Chandran

LinkedIn

Indian-origin oncologist struck off UK register after fleeing country mid-trial

Highlights

  • Oncologist Shamir Chandran was sentenced to four years in prison for coercive behaviour and cruelty to a child.
  • He fled the UK before his criminal hearing and remains a wanted man.
  • A tribunal struck him off the medical register, warning of a real risk of future harm.
A cancer doctor convicted of controlling and coercive behaviour has been removed from the UK medical register after fleeing the country and refusing to take part in his trial or a later fitness hearing.

Shamir Chandran, who lived in Houghton near Carlisle, was sentenced to four years in prison in November.

He was found guilty of two counts of coercive behaviour and one count of cruelty to a child under 16.

Keep ReadingShow less