Pooja Pillai is an entertainment journalist with Asian Media Group, where she covers cinema, pop culture, internet trends, and the politics of representation. Her work spans interviews, cultural features, and social commentary across digital platforms.
She began her reporting career as a news anchor, scripting and presenting stories for a regional newsroom. With a background in journalism and media studies, she has since built a body of work exploring how entertainment intersects with social and cultural shifts, particularly through a South Indian lens.
She brings both newsroom rigour and narrative curiosity to her work, and believes the best stories don’t just inform — they reveal what we didn’t know we needed to hear.
Shah Rukh Khan won his first National Award for Best Actor for Jawan.
Shashi Tharoor congratulated him with a simple tweet, calling him a “National Treasure”.
SRK’s humorous reply used the words “magniloquent” and “sesquipedalian,” amusing fans.
The exchange quickly went viral, with fans praising Khan’s charm and Tharoor’s wit.
Shah Rukh Khan’s National Award win for his performance in Jawan has not only thrilled fans but also sparked a trending exchange with politician Shashi Tharoor that’s got the internet talking. When Tharoor, known for his sophisticated vocabulary, kept it simple while congratulating the superstar, Khan responded with a hilariously highbrow comeback, leading netizens on a quick Google search to decode his words.
SRK wins his first National Award for his performance in JawanGetty Images
Why did Shah Rukh Khan mention “magniloquent” and “sesquipedalian”?
After the 71st National Film Awards announced Shah Rukh Khan as Best Actor for Jawan, Shashi Tharoor posted on X: “A National Treasure wins a National Award! Congratulations @iamsrk!”
In a classic display of wit, Khan replied: “Thank u for the simple praise Mr Tharoor… would not have understood something more magniloquent and sesquipedalian… ha ha.”
— (@)
The choice of words, both complex and rarely used, sparked curiosity online. According to the Oxford Dictionary, “magniloquent” refers to speaking in a lofty or pompous style, while “sesquipedalian” means using long or obscure words.
The actor’s clever nod to Tharoor’s well-known linguistic flair had fans cracking up, with many joking that SRK had just “out-Tharoored Tharoor.”
— (@)
What was Shah Rukh Khan awarded for?
Khan earned his first-ever National Film Award in 33 years for his role in Jawan, directed by Atlee. The 2023 film became a massive commercial success and featured him in a double role as Vikram Rathore, a former soldier, and Azad, his jailor son who fights against corruption. The high-octane action film not only entertained audiences but also resonated with its message about justice and systemic change.
Vikrant Massey shared the Best Actor honour for his role in 12th Fail, making it a rare tie in the category, while Rani Mukherjee won the award for the Best Actress.
Shah Rukh Khan wins first National Award as 12th Fail sweeps 71st National Film Awards Getty Images
How did fans and celebrities react to Shah Rukh Khan’s win?
The congratulatory messages poured in from across the industry. Wife Gauri Khan celebrated her husband’s milestone, posting: “Three of my absolute favourites just WON big… So proud, and so ready to brag about them forever!”
SRK cheekily responded: “Please brag about me to me when we sit for dinner tonight… thanks for producing the film.”
Director Atlee also shared an emotional note thanking Khan for trusting him with Jawan, to which the actor replied in his signature quirky style: “MAAASSS MAAASSS MAASSS… In the next song, we will do more steps. Love u.”
Actor Riddhi Dogra, who played SRK’s mother in the film, posted her heartfelt congratulations as well, prompting Khan to respond, “Big hugs… and thank u for mother ka aashirwad!”
— (@)
What did Shah Rukh Khan say in his video message?
To mark the occasion, Khan released a short video message on Instagram, expressing deep gratitude for the recognition. “To be honoured with the National Award is a moment that I will cherish for a lifetime,” he said. He thanked the award jury, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, his directors, producers, family, and fans for their continued support.
Known for his signature open-arm pose, Khan joked that he was slightly injured and couldn’t strike the pose at the moment but promised fans he would be back soon on the big screen. “Keep the popcorn ready,” he said with a wink.
Telugu blockbusters like RRR and Pushpa are drawing UK crowds.
Bollywood flops have pushed audiences to look elsewhere.
British Asians connect with stronger, rooted Telugu heroes.
Pawan Kalyan’s They Call Him OG smashed overseas records.
More UK cinemas now screen Telugu films to meet demand.
The queue for a new Bollywood film was quiet. But around the corner, snaking down the street in a British city, a different queue was buzzing. It was not for a Hollywood blockbuster. The chatter was not in Hindi. It was in Telugu, English, and regional British Asian dialects, all waiting for a Pawan Kalyan film. This scene is becoming the new normal.
Formulaic Hindi films lose ground as Telugu cinema delivers spectacle and authenticity that resonate with UK desi audiences AI generated
When the default setting broke
For years, Bollywood was the default. It was the comforting, familiar voice of 'home' for millions in the diaspora. The formulas started to feel tired. We'd grown up watching those Bollywood stars, trusting them to deliver. But something broke, and suddenly, they couldn't get people through the door. When films like Laal Singh Chaddha and Bachchhan Paandey arrived, they just failed to connect. It felt like we were being shown a plastic-wrapped India, scrubbed clean for an international crowd we no longer recognised. That old thread that tied us to them? It snapped. And in the quiet that followed, you could hear something else roaring to life.
Formulaic Hindi films lose ground as Telugu cinema delivers spectacle and authenticity that resonate with UK desi audiences AI generated
The pan-Indian quake
The rise of Telugu cinema in the UK is not an accident. It started with movies that spoke the language of sheer scale fluently. Baahubali wasn't just a movie. It was a proper legend, the kind that felt ancient and massive. It proved, without a doubt, that a story spun in India could stand tall on any screen in the world. You could feel the rumble in your seat. Then you had RRR and Pushpa crash in. They took that energy, the spectacle, and turned it into something you could chant along to. They weren't apologising for what they were, and this was the undiluted escapism fans were starving for. This was what they called "maximum entertainment," and it was a gut punch of fun.
For British Asian audiences, many with roots in smaller towns and villages, this felt more authentic than Bollywood’s increasingly urban, Western-facing stories. It was a sensibility that translated perfectly, speaking a visual language of spectacle that needed no translation.
Telugu films, by contrast, doubled down on identifiable emotion and a kind of unapologetic heroism. Their protagonists are often loud, rooted, and purposeful; they fight, they sing, they love on camera without irony.
But the shift goes deeper than just spectacle. It is about the kind of hero you want to see on screen. For a long time, mainstream British Asian representation often came with a side of comedy. The culture was sometimes the punchline: the accented parents, the generational clashes played for laughs. It was a representation that could feel limiting.
There is also a practical reason: a bigger, better diasporic infrastructure. Telugu speakers are numerous in the UK and beyond; distributors and cinemas have responded. Once theatres start screening Telugu films regularly, community momentum builds.
If there is a risk, it is twofold: Tollywood must be careful not to trade complexity for bravado, and Bollywood must decide whether to listen. For British Asians, cinema is a resource, a way to rehearse belonging.
He is almost a phenomenon in Telugu cinema. His influence doesn't end there. He's the Deputy Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, a leader who talks about Hindu culture with a fighter's intensity. When you combine that with a fanbase whose loyalty feels less like admiration and more like a fundamental belief, you get a force that's hard to ignore. The release of They Call Him OG proved it. Tickets for the world's second-largest IMAX screen, all the way in Melbourne, vanished in two flat minutes. Across international markets, the film was running circles around Bollywood's biggest offerings.
So, you sit back and look at all that, and the question just forms itself: Why does this resonate so powerfully?
For a younger British Asian generation navigating dual identities, Kalyan represents an unapologetic cultural confidence. He is not diluted. He is not a stereotype. He is power and agency wrapped in a star’s persona. He offers an "oppositional gaze," a direct challenge to the narratives where their identity was the source of conflict, not strength, and choosing him is maybe a way of reclaiming a narrative.
Pawan Kalyan’s OG breaks overseas records with sold-out shows days before release Instagram/ogmovieofficial
The end of passive viewing?
This is not just about swapping one industry for another. It is a sign of a community maturing, of knowing what it wants to see reflected in the stories it consumes. They are no longer passive recipients of whatever cinema is handed down to them. They are active choosers. They are voting with their tickets for stories that feel epic, heroes that feel powerful, and a cultural voice that does not ask for permission to be loud, proud, and entirely itself.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The Bollywood actor is making his first foray into Tollywood with this mythological epic.
He will portray Shukracharya, the revered and cunning guru to the asuras.
The first-look poster shows a completely transformed Khanna amidst a chaotic landscape.
The film is the next chapter in Prasanth Varma's expanding cinematic universe.
Production is moving fast, aiming to finish by the end of this year.
Akshaye Khanna has just grabbed a role that is going to change things up. He is joining the Telugu film Mahakali, and honestly, it is a genius move. It is not a safe debut; he is going all in as Shukracharya, that famously powerful guru to the asuras. This throws him right into the thick of Prasanth Varma’s cinematic universe, a series that has seriously shaken up how we see mythological tales on screen.
He is playing Shukracharya, which is a pretty big deal. He is the demons' preceptor, known for his vast knowledge and cunning nature. It is the kind of role that demands serious screen presence, something Khanna has in spades, and the first-look poster they dropped confirms it. He is practically unrecognisable, standing there with this focused gaze, a long beard, and robes, with what appears to be a cosmic storm forming behind him. It is quite the contrast from the roles he frequently plays.
— (@)
How does Mahakali fit into the PVCU?
This is the third film in that universe, after HanuMan and the upcoming Adhira. Think of it like everything is connected. Mahakali is another piece of that puzzle, building out this world where ancient gods and modern superhero sensibilities crash into each other. Prasanth Varma is steering the ship as the creator, but the directing duties for this one are handled by Puja Aparna Kolluru. So, while the vision is consistent, a new director will inevitably bring her own style and flavour to the Mahakali story.
Well, for starters, he is a proper Bollywood name choosing a Telugu debut in a powerful role. That does not happen every day. Then there is the look. The moment the poster hit the internet, people started drawing parallels. His get-up, the hair, the robes, it reminded many of Amitabh Bachchan's Ashwatthama from Kalki 2898 AD. The comments were flooded with jokes like "Amitabh Bachchan 40% downloaded." This means people are already talking, and that is half the battle won.
— (@)
When can we expect the film?
The crew is operating at a fast pace. According to the producers, they want to complete the entire filming process by December. That is a fairly quick turnaround. They have got a solid crew behind it too, with Suresh Ragutu on cinematography and Smaran Sai composing the score. No release date is locked in yet, but with filming expected to conclude in a few months, an announcement probably is not too far off.
Keep ReadingShow less
J K Rowling calls Emma Watson ignorant as old and new feminism collide in a bitter public feud
Rowling dismisses Watson's recent conciliatory tone as a calculated shift.
The author argues Watson's life of fame and wealth has left her ignorant of real-world issues.
A 2022 BAFTA speech and a poorly received note are cited as a major breaking point.
Rowling contrasts her own past poverty with Watson's privileged upbringing.
She firmly states that public disagreement from former collaborators warrants a public response.
The bitter divide between J K Rowling and the stars of her Harry Potter world has just gotten much deeper. In a raw and personal online post, the author tore into Emma Watson, attacking not just her opinions but her character. Rowling branded the actress as "ignorant," claiming her life of fame has left her utterly disconnected from reality. This comes immediately after Watson made a public attempt to soften their long-running and very public disagreement on transgender rights, a move that seems to have only made the Harry Potter feud worse.
J K Rowling calls Emma Watson ignorant as old and new feminism collide in a bitter public feud Getty Images
What did Emma Watson say about J K Rowling?
It all started on a podcast, with Watson chatting to host Jay Shetty about navigating personal relationships amid public disagreement. She spoke about hoping to keep loving people she doesn't necessarily agree with, a comment widely understood to be about Rowling. She fondly referred to the author as “Jo,” talking about treasuring their shared past. It sounded like a peace offering, or maybe she’s just tired of the whole mess. “I will never believe that one negates the other,” she said, trying to hold two opposing ideas in her hands at once. It was gentle. It was careful. And Rowling clearly hated every second of it.
This is where things got really nasty. She basically called Watson a rich kid who has no idea how the real world works. “Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.” She then drew a sharp line between their lives: Watson, a multimillionaire since her teens, versus Rowling herself, scribbling away in poverty while creating the entire Potter universe.
Her point? Watson can afford to champion certain ideologies from a cushy, protected bubble. Rowling, claiming her own gritty past, says she understands what’s really at stake for vulnerable women in public spaces. It’s the classic “you’ve never had it tough” argument.
— (@)
What was the final straw for J K Rowling?
Turns out, it was something years ago. She revealed the true "turning point" wasn't just Watson's public criticism, but a moment during the 2022 BAFTA Awards. Watson was on stage, and made a little quip about being there “for ALL the witches,” which everyone read as a sly dig at Rowling. But then, according to Rowling, Watson sent her a note. The note read: "I’m so sorry for what you’re going through."
It arrived when Rowling felt most exposed. She says the threats were at their worst; graphic promises of death, rape, and torture flooding in. Her security team had to tighten everything down. The fear for her family's safety was a constant worry. In that climate of genuine terror, Watson's note felt like a slap in the face. From Rowling's perspective, it was a hollow gesture, a one-line sympathy card offered after Watson had publicly poured fuel on the very fire causing the chaos.
— (@)
The generational lens shaping this conflict
Rowling's views come from a place of real struggle. She remembers living in poverty and struggling for everything. When she speaks of women's shelters and safe spaces, she is referring to physical protection for women based on their biological sex. These are real things to her, and she feels they should be safeguarded.
Watson sees things differently. She represents a newer way of thinking. Her focus is on identity and making sure everyone feels included. Her work with the UN and her public comments show this. She believes how people identify themselves is what matters most. For younger people, this makes perfect sense. For Rowling's generation, it can seem like it ignores real-world dangers.
Emma Watson reflects on her fallout with JK Rowling Getty Images
Two different ways of speaking out
Their conflict also shows how the rules for famous people have changed.
Watson's approach is modern. She is careful with her words, choosing to let her deeds speak for her. This works well today, where social media rewards this kind of subtle support.
Rowling slams Watson’s privileged perspective in trans rights clash revealing how generations see activism differentlyGetty Images
Rowling does things the old way. She writes long posts explaining exactly what she thinks. She isn't afraid to start a debate or stand alone in her opinion. She acts like someone who expects people to read her full argument and engage with it directly.
They're not just disagreeing about issues, they're using completely different playbooks from different times. One speaks in careful hints and shared understanding, the other in direct arguments and clear lines. No wonder they can't hear each other.
Keep ReadingShow less
BAFTA nominee Imran Perretta explores fractured youth in 'Ish'
BAFTA-nominated filmmaker explores fractured friendship in Ish
Inspired by his own teenage experiences and friendships
Cast two real-life best friends as the leads
Film tackles race, policing and belonging in Britain
Returning to the friendships of youth
Imran Perretta, the London-based artist and BAFTA-nominated filmmaker behind The Destructors, says his new work Ish was born out of reflection on his own teenage friendships. “It was an excuse to go back to those times and relive what it means to have friendships that are so deep in your teenage years,” he explains. “Even though what happens between the boys is difficult, there’s also joy and heartbreak.”
Portraying the stop-and-search
At the heart of the story is a police stop-and-search that shatters the relationship between two boys, Ish and Maram. Perretta was determined to avoid sensationalism. “I wanted to shoot that scene in a way that reflected how it unfolds in real life—the pauses, the waiting, the trauma of seeing a young boy step out. I didn’t try to overthink it. I just wanted to give it the rhythm and emotional weight it has in real life.”
Friendship, self-determination and identity
Although friendship and identity frame the film, Perretta prefers to speak of “self-determination”. He explains: “Identity as a notion is manifold. Really, it’s about finding yourself in a nuanced way. I wanted the actors to bring themselves to it. That way it becomes more contemporary, more true to their experience as young people.”
Writing from life, but letting go
The film draws heavily on his own life, a challenge he found both personal and universal. Co-writing with Enda Walsh allowed him to step back. “Sometimes when you write from your life, it can feel problematic, like you’re lying to make it fit a narrative. Sharing the writing meant I didn’t have to hold on so tightly. And when the boys played it out, it became their story. That was freeing, both creatively and personally.”
Casting real friends
For Perretta, authenticity was key. He and casting director Laura rounded up nearly a thousand boys in Luton, seeking non-actors rooted in the community. The final choice was serendipitous: Farhan and Yahya, who not only impressed in auditions but turned out to be real-life best friends since nursery. “The chemistry was off the charts. They’d been building it since they were kids. We didn’t have to work on it at all.”
Perretta was determined to avoid sensationalismBFI
Contributing to wider conversations
Perretta hopes Ish resonates beyond cinema. “My practice has always been to look at how government policy and state power affect people’s intimate lives. With stop-and-search, I want people to see the young person at the centre of it, to understand how it can change their life, their sense of self, their relationship with authority. It’s not a spectacle—it’s deeply personal.”
Supporting the young cast
Though the subject matter was heavy, Perretta insists the young cast carried it with remarkable maturity. His role, he says, was more like an older brother. “Film sets are pressurised environments. Our job was to make sure the boys felt valued, so they could express themselves freely. None of them had acted before, but they gave everything of themselves. It felt like a family.”
Perretta insists the young cast carried it with remarkable maturityBFI
The importance of silence and stillness
Moments of quiet are as vital as the dramatic ones. “Life is filled with silence and stillness, and so are friendships. Falling asleep under a tree, waiting at a bus stop, drifting off after watching something troubling—those moments carry their own weight. They’re just as important as the high drama.”
What audiences should take away
Ultimately, Perretta wants Ish to prompt reflection. “I hope audiences think about their own friendships and heartbreaks. And I hope they see that it’s okay to leave a relationship, whether with a best friend or a parent—that grief can be a positive energy. Beyond that, I want people to stay aware of the lives of young people, and the very adult things they have to contend with.”
Keep ReadingShow less
The lost ‘Punjabi Disco’ record that quietly changed UK British Asian club culture is finally back
A ground-breaking 1982 album combined Punjabi folk with electronic disco.
It was made to break down gender segregation at British Asian weddings.
Only 500 copies were ever pressed before it vanished into obscurity.
The original master tapes were rescued just before they turned to dust.
Its 2025 reissue finally gives a lost classic its proper moment.
Imagine a sound so ahead of its time it simply disappeared. Raw synths and a woman singing Punjabi like she was calling people to the floor. There’s anger in the story. Pride too. Mohinder Kaur Bhamra made something that did not fit then. Now it is back. Punjabi Disco was always meant to pull people into one room. To stop the quiet rules that kept women in a corner. It was a record born in West London that dared to smash traditions together, creating a revolutionary beat to get everyone dancing. Now, this lost chapter of British music is finally being heard, and it changes the story of our dance floors.
The lost ‘Punjabi Disco’ record that quietly changed UK British Asian club culture is finally back Instagram/naya.beat/mohinder.kaurbhamra
How did Punjabi Disco try to change society?
For the British Asian community in the early 1980s, racism was a constant pressure. Inside, the community held itself together, but with strict rules. At Punjabi weddings in the UK, men and women were often kept separate. The dance floor was a male space and Mohinder Kaur Bhamra had had enough. She started using her voice, her authority, to call the women in. "I felt it wasn’t fair," she said. Her son, Kuljit Bhamra, watched this and saw the power of music as a tool. He soaked up the disco energy from clubs and decided to build a new sound specifically for these new, mixed dance floors. The music was the engine for a quiet social revolution.
The lost \u2018Punjabi Disco\u2019 record that quietly changed UK British Asian club culture is finally back Instagram/naya.beat/mohinder.kaurbhamra
The basement sessions that built a new sound
Let’s get this straight. Kuljit Bhamra was not in a fancy studio. He was a 22-year-old with a head full of ideas, working out of his basement. His tools? A Roland SH-1000, one of the first synthesizers you could buy, and a clunky CR-8000 drum machine played by his 11-year-old brother, Ambi.
They brought in bassist Trevor Michael Georges and recorded at a small studio owned by Roxy Music’s bass player. But the heart of it was that basement. Kuljit took his mother Mohinder’s powerful voice trained in Punjabi folk, and wove it through these gritty, electronic rhythms.
Why did this revolutionary Punjabi Disco album vanish?
Punjabi Disco is a nine-track record made in London in 1982 by Mohinder Kaur Bhamra with production by her son Kuljit. It combined Punjabi folk singing with early synths and drum machines, a sound that prefigures later British Asian electronic music. Here is where the story turns sour. After being promised a deal, the Bhamras found a cassette in a Southall shop called Punjabi Disco but with a different singer. Someone had stolen their idea. Devastated, they managed a tiny release of just 500 copies. With no real marketing, Kuljit took to his bike, dropping off copies at local corner shops himself.
It was a hopeless task. The record sank without a trace. Mohinder went back to singing at weddings. Kuljit moved on, later becoming a legendary Bhangra producer. The album’s scarcity gave it myth status until recent rediscovery.
What does the 2025 reissue of Punjabi Disco mean now?
This is where the ghost gets a second chance. DJ Raghav Mani, who calls the album "the holy grail," spent three years tracking down the original master tapes. They were found and digitised just before they decayed forever. It is like connecting a 40-year-old vision to today’s dance culture. For Mohinder, now 89, it is a moment of quiet pride for what her family created. The beat, it turns out, was always there. We just had to find it.
The record arrives on 31 October 2025 as a remastered 2xLP and across streaming services. The reissue includes a roaring lost track, Dohai Ni Dohai, that never got released, plus remixes and covers by Peaking Lights, Baalti, Psychemagik, Mystic Jungle, and others. Naya Beat has pre-orders and single previews available now. The reissue lets club producers and listeners meet the original grooves head-on.
Why Punjabi Disco matters for British Asian culture today
This is not just a curious relic. It is proof of something often forgotten: experimentation and social change were happening in community halls long before the mainstream noticed. Mohinder actively invited women onto the main floor at family events and Kuljit scored music for that moment. That social aim, to make the dance floor mixed, is as important as the sound. The reissue, in fact, restores a piece of social history that shows how music shaped how a community moved and mixed.