Pooja was born in Kochi and raised on a mix of newspapers, pop culture, and too many questions. She studied Communicative English and Journalism before earning her Master’s in Journalism from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, and began her career interning at The Times of India and Channel I'M — where she later became a news anchor, scripting and presenting her own stories. Between deadlines, she’s worked across digital media platforms, covering politics, gender, pop culture, cinema, and everything in between. She has interviewed actors, creators, and changemakers, and occasionally edits her own video content — thanks to being certified in Photoshop and InDesign. In 2025, she joined the Asian Media Group in her first “official” newsroom gig, where she now covers entertainment, lifestyle, and the layered realities of South Asian identity. She believes storytelling should feel personal — even when it’s public — and likes to write not to please, but to provoke, question, and occasionally stir the pot.
• Indian film board has asked the makers to remove the name of China’s President Xi Jinping from the film
• Three additional dialogue changes were recommended, including replacing "item" with "madam"
• The film has received a U/A 13+ certificate with no visual cuts
• Son of Sardaar 2, starring Ajay Devgn and Mrunal Thakur, will release on 1 August 2025
Ajay Devgn’s upcoming film Son of Sardaar 2 has landed in the news just days ahead of its theatrical release, not for its content or storyline, but due to interventions by the Indian film board. While the film has been cleared with a U/A 13+ rating, the board has asked the makers to modify four specific dialogues, including the removal of a direct reference to Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Indian film board censors Xi Jinping reference in Ajay Devgn’s 'Son of Sardaar 2', suggests three more dialogue changes www.easterneye.biz
Why was Xi Jinping's name removed from Son of Sardaar 2 ?
According to reports, the Indian film board objected to a scene that mentioned Xi Jinping by name. Given the diplomatic sensitivities and past tensions between India and China, the board recommended that the line either be muted or the name be replaced.
The move is similar to earlier instances where real political references, especially involving foreign leaders, are often avoided to prevent controversy or backlash.
This is not the first time a film has faced censorship over political content. In recent years, filmmakers have had to navigate a fine line between satire, social commentary and censorship, especially when it comes to international relations.
What other changes did the Indian film board recommend?
Besides the removal of the Xi Jinping reference, the Indian film board suggested three more dialogue changes to make the film more family-friendly. The word "item" used in a particular context was replaced with "madam", as the former is often deemed derogatory or objectifying in mainstream cinema.
Another phrase, "Kutte ki tarah" (like a dog), was also changed to a softer expression, "Bahut buri tarah" (very badly), likely to tone down aggressive language. Additionally, a line beginning with "Bhagwan..." was flagged and replaced with a more neutral alternative to avoid any religious insensitivity.
These changes were made without altering the visuals. The action sequences and comic set pieces have been retained as is, and the final runtime of the film clocks in at 147 minutes and 32 seconds.
When is Son of Sardaar 2 releasing and what’s the screen count issue?
Son of Sardaar 2 is set to hit cinemas on 1 August 2025, after being postponed from its original 25 July release date. The delay was a strategic move to avoid clashing with Saiyaara, an Ahaan Panday–Aneet Padda starrer that has emerged as a box office hit.
However, the Ajay Devgn film is now facing challenges in securing enough show slots in theatres. Distributors are pushing for 60 per cent of total screens, but several exhibitors are reportedly offering only 35 per cent, prioritising ongoing hits like Saiyaara and upcoming releases like Dhadak 2.
While some single-screen theatres have agreed to two shows per day, major multiplex chains remain hesitant, which could impact the film’s opening numbers unless a mid-week momentum builds.
Who stars in Son of Sardaar 2 and who is behind it?
Directed by Vijay Kumar Arora and produced by Devgn Films in association with Jio Studios, Son of Sardaar 2 features a large ensemble cast. Apart from Devgn and Mrunal Thakur, the film includes performances by Neeru Bajwa, Deepak Dobriyal, Chunky Panday, Kubbra Sait, Ravi Kishan, Sharat Saxena, Vindu Dara Singh, Sanjay Mishra and Ashwini Kalsekar. It also marks the posthumous appearance of actor Mukul Dev.
A spiritual sequel to Devgn’s 2012 hit Son of Sardaar, this film is being promoted as an action comedy drama with a modern twist. The original clashed with Shah Rukh Khan’s Jab Tak Hai Jaan back in the day, and interestingly, SOS 2 will now release alongside another romantic drama, Dhadak 2.
YouTuber Lauren Neidigh accuses Blake Lively of harassment and seeks a court-issued protective order.
Lively’s team dropped subpoenas against Neidigh and others but left the door open to reissue them.
Neidigh says Lively’s actions were meant to silence critics amid her ongoing legal dispute with Justin Baldoni.
Lively's spokesperson insists the subpoenas were standard legal tools, not attempts to intimidate.
A YouTuber has formally accused actress Blake Lively of harassment and intimidation, requesting a protective order after Lively's legal team subpoenaed her amid an ongoing federal lawsuit involving actor-director Justin Baldoni.
Lauren Neidigh, known online as LethalLauren904, filed a statement to the court on 28 July, alleging that Lively’s actions were designed to suppress online criticism through legal pressure. The dispute stems from Lively’s broader legal battle with It Ends With Us co-star Justin Baldoni, in which she has accused him of sexual harassment.
U.S. judge rules Blake Lively’s harassment claims were legally protected speech Getty Images
Why did Blake Lively subpoena YouTubers?
Lively’s legal team had subpoenaed Neidigh and two other content creators, McKenzie Folks and Kassidy O’Connell, seeking personal data including banking information. The subpoenas were dropped shortly afterward, but not before triggering concerns among the creators.
Neidigh claims the move was an act of intimidation, writing in her letter to the court: “The subpoena targeted creators who expressed unfavourable opinions about Lively. It was not supported by any evidence and was intended to chill constitutionally protected speech.”
Despite withdrawing the subpoenas, Lively’s team has not ruled out the possibility of reissuing them, which Neidigh argues creates an “undue burden” and ongoing fear of retaliation.
In her formal plea, Neidigh has asked the court to issue a protective order to prevent Lively from issuing any further subpoenas against her or other online creators. She has also called for sanctions against the Gossip Girl star’s legal team, citing emotional distress and the invasion of privacy.
She wrote that Lively’s lawyers were “largely unresponsive” to her requests for clarification about why her personal and financial information was needed in the first place. “This was a clear misuse of legal tools to target critics,” she argued.
What’s the background on the Lively-Baldoni legal battle?
The drama between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni began in December 2024 when Lively filed a sexual harassment complaint against Baldoni, who directed and starred alongside her in It Ends With Us. In January 2025, she officially sued him.
Baldoni, in turn, countersued for defamation, but that case was dismissed in June. Lively’s case continues, with depositions already underway. Last week, she sat for questioning at her lawyer’s New York City office, reportedly with Baldoni present.
Lively has publicly spoken about the ordeal, telling Late Night With Seth Meyers in May that “fear is, by design, meant to keep us silent,” in reference to coming forward with her claims.
Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's It Ends With Us feud takes a new digital turnGetty Images
Has Blake Lively responded to the harassment claims?
A spokesperson for Lively clarified that the subpoenas were not accusations, but standard legal procedures to obtain admissible evidence. “There is no attempt to silence anyone,” the rep told Us Weekly, “This is about uncovering a coordinated media campaign designed to discredit Ms. Lively.”
The representative also claimed that Baldoni’s PR team planned an “untraceable” smear campaign after Lively’s allegations surfaced, adding that subpoenas to social media platforms are helping to “connect the evidentiary dots.”
Lively claims the lawsuit has deeply affected her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and their four children Getty Images
What’s next in the case?
While the subpoenas against Neidigh and other creators have been withdrawn for now, the legal clash is far from over. Lively continues to gather evidence, and the case is scheduled for trial on 9 March 2026.
Meanwhile, Baldoni and his wife Emily have stayed out of the spotlight, aside from a quiet family holiday earlier this year. Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds, however, have made multiple public appearances in recent months.
The fallout from this legal battle is increasingly drawing in public figures, influencers, and online commentators, turning a private dispute into a digital firestorm with potential implications for free speech and creator safety.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Shah Rukh Khan wins first National Award as 12th Fail sweeps 71st National Film Awards
Shah Rukh Khan wins Best Actor for Jawan, marking his first-ever National Film Award.
Rani Mukerji wins Best Actress for her powerful performance in Mrs Chatterjee vs Norway.
Vikrant Massey shares Best Actor award with SRK for 12th Fail, which also won Best Feature Film.
Regional hits like Parking, Ullozhukku, and Bhagavanth Kesari grab major honours.
Bollywood actors Shah Rukh Khan and Rani Mukerji emerged as the top winners at the 71st National Film Awards, announced in New Delhi on 1 August 2025. The awards honoured the best of Indian cinema from films certified in 2023, and this year’s list saw both mainstream stars and regional gems being recognised.
Shah Rukh Khan was awarded Best Actor for his lead role in Jawan, his first win at the National Film Awards. Rani Mukerji took home Best Actress for Mrs Chatterjee vs Norway, a role that earned wide critical acclaim for its emotional intensity. 12th Fail actor Vikrant Massey also shared the Best Actor honour, while his film won the Best Feature Film award.
Shah Rukh Khan wins first National Award as 12th Fail sweeps 71st National Film Awards Getty Images
Why did Shah Rukh Khan win Best Actor at the National Film Awards?
The jury recognised Shah Rukh Khan for his commanding performance in Jawan, a high-action drama that tackled themes of justice and corruption. Released in 2023, the film not only set box office records but also showcased Khan in a complex dual role. Despite decades in cinema, this marks his first-ever National Film Award, adding a prestigious feather to his already celebrated career.
Shah Rukh Khan celebrates his first-ever National Film Award win for JawanInstagram/jawanmovie
On the other hand, Vikrant Massey was lauded for his raw, nuanced portrayal of a small-town youth in 12th Fail, directed by Vidhu Vinod Chopra. The film’s inspiring story about perseverance and integrity also won Best Feature Film, reinforcing its impact beyond just performance.
Rani Mukerji’s win for Mrs Chatterjee vs Norway wasn’t surprising. Her portrayal of a Bengali mother fighting for her children’s custody against a foreign state struck a chord with audiences and critics alike. The film, based on true events, showcased Rani’s range from vulnerability to fierce resistance and highlighted real-world issues around immigration and motherhood. This marks a significant milestone in her career and a comeback of sorts to the awards spotlight.
The awards also spotlighted regional cinema. Tamil film Parking, a tense drama about a dispute over a parking space, was named Best Tamil Film, with veteran actor MS Bhaskar winning Best Supporting Actor for his performance. In Malayalam cinema, Ullozhukku was declared Best Malayalam Film, with actress Urvashi winning Best Supporting Actress.
In Telugu, Bhagavanth Kesari took home the Best Telugu Film award, while the action-fantasy HanuMan won accolades for Best Action Direction and Best AVGC (Animation, VFX, Gaming, Comics) Film. Hindi satire Kathal was awarded Best Hindi Film.
The Kerala Story earned director Sudipto Sen the Best Director honour and was also recognised for its cinematography. Other major awards included Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani as Best Popular Film for Wholesome Entertainment, with Vaibhavi Merchant winning Best Choreography for the song Dhindhora Baje Re.
Urvashi in still from Ullozhukku Screengrab Youtube
When and where will the National Film Awards ceremony take place?
The winners were announced at the National Media Centre in New Delhi, with the awards to be formally presented by the President of India at a later date. The list reflects the wide-ranging talent and diversity of Indian cinema in 2023, from indie dramas to mass entertainers.
For British South Asian audiences, the National Film Awards remain a trusted way to discover standout performances and breakthrough films from India. This year’s winners reflect how powerful stories are coming from across regions, not just mainstream Bollywood.
Keep ReadingShow less
Beyoncé Levi’s ad compared to Sydney Sweeney’s ‘great jeans’ campaign
Beyoncé’s Levi’s ad is being compared to Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle campaign that sparked outrage online.
Sweeney’s ad was accused of using language that subtly promoted eugenics, with the pun “great jeans/genes.”
Some users claimed the criticism was hypocritical, citing Beyoncé’s similar visual styling in her Levi’s campaign.
American Eagle has not issued any apology, despite viral posts suggesting otherwise.
A recent wave of backlash against Sydney Sweeney’s new American Eagle campaign has now pulled Beyoncé’s Levi’s ad into the spotlight. The online debate, which began over the alleged use of racially charged language in Sweeney’s denim campaign, has grown into a larger discussion about double standards and historical context in fashion advertising.
Beyoncé Levi’s ad compared to Sydney Sweeney’s ‘great jeans’ campaign X/Nicole Saphier, MD/americaneagle
Why is Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad controversial?
The criticism of the American Eagle campaign revolves around a wordplay in the ad's script. Sweeney, dressed in denim, says, “Genes are passed down from parents... My jeans are blue.” The tagline reads: Sydney Sweeney has great jeans. While the brand clearly intended a light-hearted pun, many viewers found the messaging deeply problematic.
Commentators online accused the campaign of alluding to eugenics, the debunked and dangerous ideology that promotes selective breeding to enhance human traits. The combination of Sweeney’s blue eyes, blonde hair, and the word “genes” sparked concerns about the glorification of whiteness.
One user on X wrote, “The ad infers that blue eyes and blonde hair are superior. It’s not about denim, it’s about what that phrase echoes historically.”
— (@)
How did Beyoncé get dragged into the Sydney Sweeney debate?
In the days following the controversy, social media users began comparing Sweeney’s ad to Beyoncé’s Levi’s campaign from late 2024. Beyoncé’s campaign also featured denim-on-denim styling, blonde hair, and close-up shots, prompting some to question the public’s reaction.
One viral post read: “So Beyoncé can pose in Levi jeans and it’s art… But when a white woman does it, it’s a national crisis?” Others were quick to dismiss this comparison, pointing out that Beyoncé never referenced “genes” or made genetic implications. Her ad campaign, launched alongside her Cowboy Carter album, was focused on music, fashion, and the history of Black artists in country music.
A user responded to the criticism: “Beyoncé didn’t say anything about genes. This is not about posing in jeans, it’s about the message behind the words.”
— (@)
Did American Eagle respond to the backlash?
Despite the uproar, American Eagle has not officially addressed the criticism. A viral post claiming the brand had apologised was confirmed to be fake. The alleged statement circulated with a photoshopped logo and a sarcastic tone that only added to the confusion.
X user @tan_bruss posted the image on 30 July, but no such apology or clarification appears on American Eagle’s official channels or press releases.
This silence has only intensified debate, with some users accusing the brand of ignoring the concerns and others defending the ad as being taken out of context.
The larger discussion sparked by the campaign is not just about one ad or two celebrities. For many, it’s a reminder of how language and imagery in fashion can carry weight, especially when it touches on race, beauty standards, and historical oppression.
Social media commentator @dukepege wrote, “Statements like ‘great genes’ aren’t neutral. They bring back memories of when certain races were deemed superior. The fact that some people don’t get that is exactly the problem.”
Even Beyoncé’s inclusion in the discourse, despite not referencing genes at all, shows how sensitive and polarised conversations around race and beauty remain in the public sphere.
Keep ReadingShow less
Timberlake shared his Lyme disease diagnosis in a heartfelt Instagram post
Justin Timberlake confirms he’s living with Lyme disease in emotional Instagram post
The diagnosis came after months of unexplained fatigue and nerve pain during his world tour
The Forget Tomorrow tour concluded in Turkey on 30 July after two years
Timberlake says he wants to be “more transparent” to prevent speculation about his performance issues
Justin Timberlake has revealed that he has been diagnosed with Lyme disease, opening up about the toll the condition took during his recent Forget Tomorrow world tour. The singer and actor shared the news in a heartfelt Instagram post on 31 July, just a day after wrapping up his global tour in Turkey.
In his message, Timberlake explained that the mysterious symptoms he experienced while touring, including nerve pain, exhaustion, and frequent illness, were finally traced to Lyme disease, a bacterial infection caused by tick bites. Despite the physical toll, he chose to complete the tour, saying the joy of performing made it worth the struggle.
Timberlake said the joy of performing helped him push through the painGetty Images
What is Lyme disease and how did Timberlake get diagnosed?
Lyme disease is caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, transmitted to humans through tick bites. According to Timberlake, his diagnosis followed months of debilitating symptoms that initially lacked a clear explanation.
“I would be on stage and in a massive amount of nerve pain or just feeling crazy fatigue or sickness,” he wrote, reflecting on his experience. While he considered ending the tour early, he ultimately pushed through the demanding schedule.
Early symptoms of Lyme disease can appear days or even weeks after a tick bite and often include a distinct circular rash, fatigue, muscle pain, and fever. If not treated promptly, it can affect the nervous system, joints, and heart, sometimes leading to long-term complications.
How common is Lyme disease and who else has it affected?
Though Lyme disease is most prevalent in parts of North America, Europe, and some regions of Asia, cases have been reported in India too, particularly in hilly or forested areas like Wayanad in Kerala.
Timberlake now joins a list of high-profile celebrities who have spoken publicly about their struggles with Lyme disease, including Justin Bieber, Avril Lavigne, and Shania Twain. Each has described the disease as mentally and physically exhausting, especially when diagnosis is delayed.
Why Timberlake is speaking up now
Timberlake said he felt the need to be “more transparent” about his condition after fans began speculating online about inconsistent performances during the tour. His aim, he said, is to prevent misinterpretation and raise awareness.
“As many of you know, I'm a pretty private person,” he wrote. “But I want to shed some light on what I’ve been up against behind the scenes.”
He also said the experience taught him a lot about his own resilience. “Not only did I prove my mental tenacity to myself, but I now have so many special moments with all of you that I will never forget.”
Fans react to Timberlake’s health revelation following weeks of performance criticismGetty Images
What happens next for Justin Timberlake?
Timberlake’s Forget Tomorrow world tour, which began in April 2024, marked a major career milestone and comeback effort amid a turbulent few years. The tour spanned multiple continents and was met with mixed reviews, some praising the performances, others questioning his energy levels.
His health revelation follows a public drink-driving incident in 2024 and renewed media attention around his past relationship with Britney Spears, as revisited in her memoir and related documentaries.
As for his current health, Timberlake has not revealed whether he’s undergoing treatment, though antibiotics are the standard therapy for Lyme disease. Most people recover fully if treated early, though some symptoms can linger for months or even years.
Justin Timberlake reveals Lyme disease battle after ‘Forget Tomorrow’ world tour endsGetty Images
With this diagnosis now public, Timberlake seems focused on recovery and setting the record straight. “This isn’t for sympathy,” he said, “but for clarity and hopefully to help others going through the same.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Urvashi Rautela alleged her suitcase vanished directly from the baggage belt at Gatwick
Urvashi Rautela alleges her Dior bag containing £60,200 ( ₹70 lakh) jewellery was stolen at Gatwick Airport.
The actress posted flight and baggage details on Instagram, urging Emirates and authorities for help.
She called it a serious security lapse and claimed no support was provided by Gatwick officials.
The incident comes weeks after her mother accused a former staff member of theft.
Bollywood actress and former Miss Universe India, Urvashi Rautela, has alleged that her Dior-branded baggage containing jewellery worth £60,200 ( ₹70 lakh) was stolen at London’s Gatwick Airport. The incident occurred during her travel from Mumbai to London via Emirates Airlines for the 2025 Wimbledon championship.
Sharing the ordeal on Instagram, Rautela posted images of her missing brown Dior suitcase, Emirates boarding pass, and baggage tag. She tagged UK Police, Emirates, and Wimbledon authorities, calling the theft an “alarming breach of airport security”.
Urvashi Rautela’s designer bag was allegedly stolen shortly after she arrived in London for WimbledonGetty Images
What did Urvashi Rautela say about the stolen jewellery?
On Thursday, Rautela posted, “Injustice tolerated is injustice repeated. Our @wimbledon @dior brown baggage was stolen from the belt at @gatwickairport after flying @emirates from Mumbai during #Wimbledon.” She pleaded for urgent action to trace her luggage.
In a separate statement released through her team, she said, “Despite holding our baggage tag and Emirates ticket, the bag went missing directly from the belt area, a disturbing breach of traveller safety. This isn’t just about lost property. It's about dignity, accountability, and the safety of passengers.”
Rautela added that she had reached out to Emirates support and Gatwick Airport officials but had not received any assistance.
Why is the incident raising security concerns at Gatwick?
The reported theft from a restricted baggage claim zone at one of the UK’s busiest airports has triggered questions around passenger safety and surveillance. If confirmed, it highlights a potential loophole in Gatwick’s luggage security and Emirates’ handling protocols.
Despite being a Platinum Emirates member and flying on a direct route from Mumbai, Rautela claims there were no immediate steps taken by the airport to retrieve her belongings.
This incident follows her 2023 claim of losing a 24-carat gold iPhone during a cricket match in Ahmedabad, an item she never recovered.
Urvashi Rautela's Dior suitcase with jewellery goes missing at GatwickInstagram/urvashirautela
How did social media react to Urvashi’s post?
Though the actress disabled comments on her theft post, screenshots of earlier responses quickly circulated online. Some users joked about the missing “Labubus”, collectible toys that adorned her Hermes bag at Wimbledon earlier this month. One wrote, “Hope your Labubus are safe!”, referencing her viral fashion moment.
Others sarcastically noted that Rautela appears to have a pattern of losing high-value items. “From gold iPhone to Dior baggage, airport gods stay undefeated,” a meme account posted on X.
Urvashi Rautela pictured at Wimbledon days before reporting her Dior bag missing from GatwickInstagram/urvashirautela
Is there a link to her ex-manager’s theft controversy?
Interestingly, this isn’t the only theft-related allegation involving Rautela in recent times. Just weeks ago, her mother Meera Rautela publicly accused Urvashi’s former manager Vedika Prakash Shetty of stealing expensive clothing and jewellery between 2015 and 2017.
She claimed Shetty caused a “huge financial loss” to the family during Urvashi’s Miss Universe days. While no legal case has been confirmed, the family said they regretted not taking action sooner.
She was last seen in Daaku Maharaj opposite Nandamuri Balakrishna and in Jaat with Sunny Deol. Her only officially confirmed upcoming project is the thriller Kasoor.