Residents raise concerns over Wembley's plans to host more events
By Grant WilliamsJul 25, 2024
An application from Wembley Stadium to increase the number of major events it hosts each year by eight has sparked fear amongst some residents that their ‘quality of life will decrease’.
One 94-year-old woman who requires home care and her son worry that disruptions to public transport will mean carers struggle to tend to her on event days.
The 90,000-seater national stadium has applied to Brent Council to increase the number of events from 46 to 54. An ‘event cap’ was introduced after the original stadium was demolished and replaced, which limited the number of major sporting events held at the stadium each year to 22 and non-sporting events to 15 but this has steadily increased over the years. Unlimited additional events were permitted providing the number of spectators was below 51,000.
Concerns have been raised by residents who live in the catchment area of the stadium who feel they are a ‘secondary consideration’ in the decision-making process. Anil, 66, said that the event days can be disruptive for his 94-year-old mother, who requires home care four times a day.
He said: “She is basically dependent on [the carers]. I’m with her most of the time but then to clean her, feed her, and everything else she is dependent on them. On event days, obviously not all of the carers have cars so they depend on public transport. […] But they cut the buses and close the roads so sometimes they can’t get here.”
Anil’s mother is visited by carers first thing in the morning, then at lunchtime, again at 4pm, then followed by the final visit at 6:30pm. If carers aren’t able to attend some of the appointments, particularly the evening one, then it could be many hours before she is seen to.
Anil said: “It does affect us in such a way that she’s not being fed on time, or she’s not being cleaned on time. […] I can do certain things before they come and clean up after they leave […] but me being a male she doesn’t want me to be doing some of the things like cleaning her.”
He added: “If she has spoiled a nappy or something then you don’t want to leave it too long because what happens is you get other issues. If things aren’t done regularly then she gets bed sores and […] if these aren’t treated quickly then they can turn into ulcers. She’s still alert and everything, she knows what’s going on around her and she wants some freedom.”
Anil’s mother lives on the periphery of the catchment area, but those residing in the immediate vicinity of the stadium are also against the plans. They say the rubbish, volume of people, and noise already make living in the area difficult, but fear increasing the number of events will impact them ‘significantly’.
One resident, 32, who preferred not to share her name, moved into one of the properties in Wembley Park during Covid. She claims she was told at the time that there would be 19 large-scale events each year but there are ‘far more’ and is opposed to the proposed changes.
She said: “It doesn’t seem like they are doing the amount of events that they have in a reasonable way that puts the community first. I can reasonably assume that my quality of life will continue to decrease here.”
She added: “It’s so infuriating to see what happens after music events and athletic events where people forget that we live here. There were men with snow shovels full of Harry Styles feathers, I’ve never seen anything like it.
“The entire neighbourhood more or less shuts down because it caters to the events. Maybe what folks don’t realise when they sign a lease here is that you’re essentially signing up to live where people come to party. I get it, but it’s now every weekend and some weekdays too.”
She said she often feels intimidated walking back to her home through the crowd and also highlighted security issues that residents face, with people often able to gain access to their buildings.
Another resident, 41, has been living in one of the residential buildings immediately outside the stadium since it first opened in 2019. He said people had been ‘sneaking’ into residential buildings after discovering that there was a leisure room, with a video game area and pool table.
He said: “They were always coming in and being very aggressive. They run up and down the building, knocking on doors late at night. Sometimes it has been quite scary. Someone has actually been stabbed inside the building because they told them to leave.”
He added: “The dirtiness of the area, mostly after football matches, […] is the worst. This place becomes a public toilet. They wee up the walls here and don’t care about women or kids walking past. […] When we first moved here we checked the events before because I know the stadium can affect my life. The reality is that they declare to us that it’s just 30 to 35 events per year, which is not an issue. But now it’s incredible.”
Most residents acknowledged that it is those attending sporting events, especially football, that cause the greatest impact as concerts tend to attract a more family-friendly crowd.
Wembley Stadium has emphasised that the changes would mean ‘no additional football or sporting events’ – maintaining the existing maximum cap of 25 sports events per year.
A spokesperson for Wembley Stadium said: “The event cap variation would give us the flexibility to offer a wider range of dates to prospective concert promoters who are looking to bring major acts and shows to Wembley Stadium.”
They added: “Although the application is for an additional eight non-sporting events each year, it is unlikely we would ever fulfil this requirement. Our Best-in-Class initiative, which helps to manage major events in partnership with all our key stakeholders, will be maintained and extended for any additional events.”
It’s estimated that each additional event will generate £4.5 million for Brent and create between 33,200 to 44,000 additional positions for event staff. The application will come before the council’s planning committee next month where a decision will be made.
Brent Council Leader, Cllr Muhammed Butt, said: “For the most part the events at the Stadium are a success, but it would be remiss of us not to recognise the disruption that event days can have on Brent residents.”
He added: “It is imperative that any application from the stadium, by means of mitigation, strikes a balance with the community. Brent Council will continue to work in partnership with everyone involved so I will be calling for improved collaboration with residents and stakeholders alike as we negotiate any future terms with the stadium going forward.”
Prime minister Keir Starmer delivers a speech at The British Chambers of Commerce Global Annual Conference in London on June 26, 2025. (Photo by EDDIE MULHOLLAND/AFP via Getty Images)
PRIME MINISTER Sir Keir Starmer has admitted he was wrong to warn that Britain could become an "island of strangers" due to high immigration, saying he "deeply" regrets the controversial phrase.
Speaking to The Observer, Sir Keir said he would not have used those words if he had known they would be seen as echoing the language of Enoch Powell's notorious 1968 "rivers of blood" speech.
"I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as, an echo of Powell. I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either," he explained. "But that particular phrase – no, it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth – I deeply regret using it."
Starmer made the remarks last month while announcing new immigration controls. He had said that without proper rules, "we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together."
The comments sparked fury from Labour MPs and other critics who accused him of copying the language of Powell, the former Tory minister whose inflammatory speech warned that native Britons had "found themselves made strangers in their own country" because of immigration.
Former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell said Sir Keir was "reflecting the language of Enoch Powell," while suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana branded the speech "sickening."
Diane Abbott, Britain's first black female MP, called the phrase "fundamentally racist."
Sir Keir accepted full responsibility for the mistake, saying he should have "read through the speech properly" and "held it up to the light a bit more." He also acknowledged there were "problems with the language" in a policy document where he claimed recent immigration had caused "incalculable" damage to Britain.
The climbdown marks another reversal for the Labour leader, who has faced criticism for changing course on several policies including winter fuel payments and welfare reforms. Just this week he watered down controversial benefit changes to avoid a rebellion from his own MPs.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage seized on the apology as proof that Sir Keir "has no beliefs, no principles and just reads from a script."
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said it showed the prime minister "doesn't believe in borders or the nation state."
Despite the backlash when the speech was first delivered, Downing Street had initially defended the comments.
The prime minister's spokesman said they "completely rejected" comparisons to Powell and confirmed Sir Keir stood by his words.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper had also backed the prime minister, arguing his remarks were "completely different" to Powell's and highlighting how he had praised Britain's diversity "in almost the same breath."
London mayor Sadiq Khan and Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan had both distanced themselves from the language at the time, with Khan saying they "aren't words that I would use."
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Sir Sajid Javid (Photo by Tom Nicholson-WPA Pool/Getty Images)
A cross-party group has been formed to tackle the deep divisions that sparked last summer's riots across England. The new commission will be led by former Tory minister Sir Sajid Javid and ex-Labour MP Jon Cruddas.
The Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion has backing from both prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. It brings together 19 experts from different political parties and walks of life.
It was set up following the violent unrest that broke out in 27 towns and cities after three young girls were killed in Southport last July. False claims about the attacker's identity spread rapidly on social media, helping to fuel the disorder.
Sir Sajid warned that Britain has become a "tinderbox of division" due to years of neglect. He said governments have only acted when tensions boil over, rather than dealing with the root problems. "We are more disconnected as a country than at any point in our modern history," he told reporters. "There is a pandemic of loneliness that has spread across the country."
According to Javid, who served as communities secretary, home secretary and chancellor in the cabinets of David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson, social cohesion had been treated as a “second tier” issue by successive governments.
“Communal life in Britain is under threat like never before and intervention is urgently needed," he told the Telegraph. "There have been long-term, chronic issues undermining connections within our communities for several decades now, such as the degradation of local infrastructure from the local pub to churches, the weakening of family units, growing inequality, declining trust in institutions and persistent neglect from policy-makers."
He pointed to several factors making the situation worse, including high levels of immigration that haven't been properly managed, rising cost of living pressures, social media spreading extremist views, declining trust in public institutions, and the breakdown of local community spaces like pubs and churches.
Cruddas, who represented Dagenham for over 20 years, said the commission would listen directly to people across Britain rather than impose solutions from Westminster.
Over the next 12 months, the panel will examine what's driving people apart and develop practical recommendations for government. The group includes former West Midlands mayor Sir Andy Street, ex-Green Party leader Caroline Lucas, and counter-extremism expert Dame Sara Khan.
The commission is being supported by the Together Coalition, which was founded by Brendan Cox after his wife, MP Jo Cox, was murdered by a far-right extremist in 2016.
Sir Sajid remains optimistic about Britain's future, saying the country has "phenomenal attributes" to overcome its challenges. The commission aims to create "a vision for communities that all British citizens can buy into."
Keep ReadingShow less
Masum was seen on CCTV trying to steer the pram away and, when she refused to go with him, stabbed her multiple times before walking away and boarding a bus. (Photo: West Yorkshire Police)
A MAN who stabbed his estranged wife to death in Bradford in front of their baby has been convicted of murder.
Habibur Masum, 26, attacked 27-year-old Kulsuma Akter in broad daylight on April 6, 2024, stabbing her more than 25 times while she pushed their seven-month-old son in a pram. The baby was not harmed.
Bradford Crown Court heard that Akter had been living in a refuge since January after Masum threatened her with a knife at their home in Oldham. Masum tracked her using her phone location and confronted her after she left the refuge to meet a friend, believing he was in Spain.
Masum was seen on CCTV trying to steer the pram away and, when she refused to go with him, stabbed her multiple times before walking away and boarding a bus. He was arrested three days later in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
Kulsuma Aktergetty images
Masum, of Leamington Avenue, Burnley, had admitted manslaughter and possession of a knife but denied murder. He was found guilty of murder, stalking, making threats to kill, and assault by beating.
The Crown Prosecution Service said the attack was “planned and premeditated”. West Yorkshire Police described it as a “brutal” daylight attack. Det Ch Insp Stacey Atkinson said Ms Akter “should have been safe”.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct found no breach of standards by officers involved prior to her death. Masum is due to be sentenced on 22 July.
Keep ReadingShow less
Air India's Boeing 787-8 aircraft, operating flight AI-171 to London Gatwick, crashed into a medical hostel complex shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad on June 12.
INDIA has declined a request from the United Nations aviation agency to allow one of its investigators to observe the probe into the Air India crash that killed 260 people in Ahmedabad on June 12, Reuters reported, citing two senior sources familiar with the matter.
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) had offered to provide assistance by sending one of its investigators, following the crash of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner earlier this month. It was an unusual move, as ICAO typically deploys investigators only upon request from the country leading the investigation.
In this case, ICAO had asked Indian authorities to allow the investigator already present in India to join the probe as an observer, the sources told Reuters. However, Indian officials refused the offer. Times Now was the first to report this development on Thursday.
The civil aviation ministry said on Thursday that the flight recorder data was downloaded around two weeks after the crash.
Some safety experts had earlier raised concerns over the delay in the analysis of the black box data and a lack of information on the progress of the probe. The first combined black box unit was recovered on June 13, and a second set was found on June 16.
It is still unclear whether the black boxes are being read in India or the US. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is also participating in the investigation. The Indian government has held only one press conference so far, where no questions were taken.
According to global aviation norms under "Annex 13", a decision on where to read the flight recorders should be made immediately if the information obtained could help prevent similar accidents in the future.
An unnamed aviation ministry official said earlier this week that the ministry is "following all the ICAO protocols." The official also said that media representatives have been sharing updates on major developments.
Most air accidents result from a combination of factors. A preliminary report is expected within about 30 days of the crash.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Wintour’s style of leadership earned her the nickname “Nuclear Wintour”
Anna Wintour steps down as editor of US Vogue after 37 years
She will remain Vogue’s global editorial director and hold senior roles at Condé Nast
Wintour transformed US Vogue into a global fashion authority
The 75-year-old has received numerous honours, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom
End of an era at US Vogue
Anna Wintour has stepped down as the editor of US Vogue, bringing to a close a 37-year tenure that redefined the publication and saw her become one of the most influential figures in global fashion.
The announcement was made on Thursday (26 June) during a staff meeting in New York. Wintour, 75, will no longer oversee the day-to-day editorial operations of Vogue’s US edition. However, she will continue to serve as Vogue’s global editorial director and Condé Nast’s chief content officer, maintaining senior leadership roles across the company.
A transformative legacy
Wintour took the helm of US Vogue in 1988, inheriting a relatively conservative magazine. She swiftly transformed it into a trendsetting, authoritative voice in fashion. Under her leadership, the publication became known for its iconic covers, high-end photography, and ability to shape careers in the fashion industry.
With extensive budgets and strong advertising support, Vogue became a global fashion flagship, influencing designers, celebrities, and brands worldwide.
Wintour’s style of leadership earned her the nickname “Nuclear Wintour” for her decisiveness, with some reports noting her tendency to make bold editorial decisions without extensive discussion. Her distinctive bob haircut and ever-present sunglasses made her a recognisable front-row figure at fashion weeks around the world.
Beyond the magazine
The British-born editor rose to wider public fame as the inspiration behind the character Miranda Priestly in The Devil Wears Prada — both the 2003 novel and the 2006 film adaptation. While Wintour rarely commented on the portrayal, she acknowledged the attention it brought, most recently during the launch of a stage musical adaptation in London in 2024.
She told the BBC, “They [my sunglasses] help me see and they help me not see. They help me be seen and not be seen. They are a prop, I would say.”
Wintour also became synonymous with the Met Gala, the annual high-profile charity event in New York City, which she has organised for years, drawing celebrities from fashion, film, politics, and sport.
Recognition and future plans
Wintour has received numerous accolades during her career. She was made a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (DBE) in 2017 and became a Companion of Honour in February 2025. During the ceremony in London, she removed her sunglasses to receive the award and told King Charles III that she had no intention of retiring.
Wintour also became synonymous with the Met GalaGetty Images
In the United States, President Joe Biden awarded her the Presidential Medal of Freedom earlier this year before leaving office.
Despite stepping back from US Vogue, Wintour will continue to oversee several major Condé Nast titles including Wired, Vanity Fair, GQ, Condé Nast Traveler, and Glamour, as part of her global leadership responsibilities.
In her remarks to staff, she described the decision as “pivotal” but confirmed she would not be leaving the company or her office. “I’ll be turning all my attention to global leadership and working with our team of brilliant editors around the world,” she said.