Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Andrew accused of claiming massage expenses as trade envoy

Andrew has always rejected any wrongdoing in his associations with Jeffrey Epstein and denied any personal gain from his role. His position was unpaid, but overseas trips were supported by civil servants and taxpayer funding.

Andrew

On Thursday, ANdrew was arrested by Thames Valley Police on suspicion of misconduct in public office but has not faced charges.

Reuters

ANDREW MOUNTBATTEN-WINDSOR charged taxpayers for massage services and excessive travel costs while serving as the UK’s trade envoy, two retired civil servants have told the BBC.

One former civil servant, who worked in the UK’s trade department in the early 2000s, said he refused a request to cover the cost of “massage services” following a visit by Andrew to the Middle East but was overruled by senior staff. “I thought it was wrong… I'd said we mustn't pay it, but we ended up paying it anyway,” he told the BBC.


The Department for Business and Trade has not challenged the claim about Andrew’s time as envoy between 2001 and 2011, but referred to the ongoing police investigation.

Andrew has always rejected any wrongdoing in his associations with Jeffrey Epstein and denied any personal gain from his role. His position was unpaid, but overseas trips were supported by civil servants and taxpayer funding.

A former senior Whitehall official said he had “absolutely no doubt” about similar expenses and described “lavish spending”, including flights, hotel rooms and entourage costs. “I couldn't believe it… it was like it wasn't real money, they weren't spending any of their own money,” he said. He said spending checks were given a “rubber stamp”.

MPs on the Business and Trade Committee will meet to discuss a possible inquiry.

The Liberal Democrats plan to force a Commons debate. Tom Tugendhat has called for an inquiry.

On Thursday, Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested by Thames Valley Police on suspicion of misconduct in public office but has not faced charges.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

The Immigration Health Surcharge is a fee that most people applying for eligible UK visas must pay as part of their immigration application. It is intended to contribute towards the cost of healthcare during their stay in the country.

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

Highlights:

  • Migrants paying the IHS contributed at least 60% more to NHS finances than their estimated healthcare costs in 2023/24, including standard tax contributions.
  • The annual surcharge has risen from £200 to £1,035 for most visa applicants.
  • IHS revenue peaked at almost £2.5 billion in 2024/25.
  • The surcharge now accounts for more than 1 per cent of the NHS budget.
  • Revenue fell to £2.3 billion in 2025/26 as immigration numbers declined.
  • Around one-fifth of the NHS workforce comes from overseas, according to the Nuffield Trust fellow quoted in the report.

  • Migrants who pay to live and work in the UK are contributing substantially more to NHS finances than the estimated cost of the healthcare they receive, according to new analysis by the Nuffield Trust. The findings have reignited debate over immigration, healthcare funding and the purpose of the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS).

    Keep ReadingShow less