Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Peer’s exit ‘should worry Labour’

By Amit Roy

THE Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is becoming fond of us­ing the phrase. “If I were prime minister…,” no doubt to get peo­ple used to the idea.


He used it last week in relation to Priti Patel: “If I were prime minister, the home secretary would have been removed from her job.”

Actually, no. Maybe I am being pedantic but if Sir Keir were to be elected prime minister, Priti, the Tory MP for Witham, wouldn’t be in his cabinet.

What Sir Keir should be deal­ing with is much more serious – Lord Meghnad Desai’s departure from the Labour party after 49 years as a member.

Labour MPs have called for an­other investigation into Priti, but really they should be trying to find out why Meghnad has left after so many years.

As it is, Labour’s appeal among Indians is declining for a variety of reasons. According to Meghnad, Labour doesn’t like immi­grants with ideas above their sta­tion. They want Indians and Paki­stanis to embrace a permanent state of victimhood from which they can be rescued only by La­bour and not the Tories.

What enrages them about Priti is that not only is she a “traitor” to the cause, but she has positioned herself on the right wing of the Conservative party.

Of course, the real situation might not be so black and white, but Meghnad’s resignation is a devastating blow to Labour. If someone as hitherto loyal as Meghnad won’t support La­bour after five decades as a member, it will certainly put off a great many other Indian vot­ers as well.

Meghnad, who helped raise the funds for the Mahatma Gandhi statue erected in Parlia­ment Square in March 2015, is also well known and respected in India. He is a frequent con­tributor to Indian newspapers. In other words, his is an influ­ential voice.

People in India will soon come to realise that the Labour party of leaders like Michael Foot, to which Indians owed their allegiance, is not the La­bour party of today.

Jeremy Corbyn is an hon­ourable man at a personal lev­el, but during his five years as Labour leader, he could not be bothered to visit India even once. His stance on Kashmir contrib­uted to Labour’s defeat at the last election.

I know Meghnad to be a very generous man, who has some­thing good to say about almost everyone. That is apparent from Meghnad’s just published autobiography, Rebellious Lord, which apart from anything else is an entertaining read.

He explains why he did not al­ways do well in exams in India: “One of my problems was that I could not give the standard an­swer which was what got you the marks. I deviated from the straight and narrow and showed off my reading or tried some jokes. None of this helps you in an Indian examination, where you have to display memory and rote learning.”

And on the life peerage he had been promised (and received) in 1991, the first Asian to be so hon­oured, he writes: “For the next few weeks, I felt as I imagine a woman feels who is pregnant but hopes no one finds out nor can she talk about it.”

The autobiography makes it clear that Meghnad has given a lifetime of devoted service to La­bour. Sir Keir should get over his Priti obsession and learn some­thing by reading Rebellious Lord.

More For You

tech grok

Musk – the world’s richest man – wants to be the greatest global influencer too: a Citizen Kane for our age. (Photo credit: Getty Images)

Why Britain must make social media lawful again

THIS must be a “tipping point” for the rule of law online, technology secretary Liz Kendall told the House of Commons earlier this week. X owner Elon Musk’s Grok AI tool helped that site’s users make sexist harassment the viral new year trend of 2026. Politicians across the world declared it was “appalling” and “unacceptable”. The challenge is to turn that declaratory rhetoric into action. Britain’s media regulator Ofcom will open a formal investigation.

The controversy has illuminated again how US billionaire businessman Musk takes a “pick and mix” approach as to which laws he thinks should apply to him and his companies. Even libertarian site owners tend to recognise some responsibility to remove child sexual abuse. But Musk was laughing about the nudification trend. He is contemptuous about laws curbing hate crime and the incitement of violence, saying they are signs Britain has a “fascist” government which must be overthrown. What is vital is that our government and regulators do not risk emulating Musk’s “pick and mix” approach to when unlawful content really matters. Ofcom states it will not “hesitate to investigate” when it suspects companies are failing in their duties “especially where there’s a risk of harm to children”. This will be a popular public priority. Ofcom must this year show parliamentarians and the public that it can find the bandwidth and capacity to insist on sites meeting all of their legal duties.

Keep ReadingShow less