PAKISTAN has dropped 16 spots on the global Corruption Perceptions Index for 2021 and is ranked 140th out of 180 countries, Transparency International said in a report on Tuesday (25).
It comes as a major blow to prime minister Imran Khan's government which came to power on the promise of clean governance.
The report released by the Berlin-based non-profit organisation said corruption levels remain at a standstill worldwide, with 86 per cent of countries making little to no progress in the last 10 years.
In its 2021 edition, the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) ranks 180 countries and territories by their perceived levels of public sector corruption on a scale of zero (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean), drawing on 13 expert assessments and surveys of business executives.
In 2020, Pakistan's CPI was 31 and it was ranked 124 out of 180 countries. According to Transparency International, the country's corruption score has now deteriorated to 28.
Comparatively, India's score stands at 40 and is ranked 85, while Bangladesh's CPI is 26 and stands at the 147th position.
Explaining the causes of the low score of Pakistan, the report said the absence of the “rule of law” and “state capture” were the main reasons.
The report comes at a time when Khan is under pressure to improve the performance of his government. His advisor on accountability, Shehzad Akbar, stepped down on Monday (24) amid reports of his poor performance in bringing the corrupt elements to justice.
To add to Khan's woes, Justice (retired) Nasira Iqbal, vice-chair of Transparency International Pakistan, said the ranking of the country under the current government has gradually come down.
In 2019, it was 120th out of 180 countries, in 2020, it was 124th and in 2021 it worsened further to 140, she said.
In contrast, in 2018, during the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) period, Pakistan's ranking was 117 out of 180 countries.
The CPI global average remains unchanged at 43 for the 10th year in a row, and two-thirds of countries score below 50, the report said.
According to the report, the top-performing countries are Denmark, Finland and New Zealand, all having a corruption perceptions score of 88, followed by Norway, Singapore and Sweden, all of them scoring 85.
In contrast, the worst-performing countries were South Sudan with a corruption perceptions score of 11, followed by Syria (13), Somalia (13, Venezuela (14) and Afghanistan (16).
Transparency International calls on governments to act on their anti-corruption and human rights commitments and for people across the globe to join together in demanding change.
“In authoritarian contexts where control over government, business and the media rests with a few, social movements remain the last check on power. It is the power held by teachers, shopkeepers, students and ordinary people from all walks of life that will ultimately deliver accountability,” said Daniel Eriksson, chief executive officer of Transparency International.
The Index scores are based on the perceptions of public sector corruption, using data from 13 external sources, including the World Bank, World Economic Forum, private risk consulting companies, think tanks and others. The scores reflect the views of the experts and business people.
(PTI)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You
Henry Nowak’s killer’s minimum jail term increased to 25 years
Nov 05, 2026
Highlights
- Digwa’s minimum term increased from 21 to 25 years after three senior judges ruled the original sentence failed to reflect the seriousness of the murder.
- Judges said the lawful carrying of a Sikh religious blade did not reduce the seriousness of its subsequent unlawful use.
- Digwa’s mother, Kiran Kaur, has abandoned her appeal against her three-year sentence for hiding the murder weapon.
- An independent review is examining the police response to the killing and possible missed opportunities to intervene.
THE minimum prison term for the murder of university student Henry Nowak has been increased from 21 to 25 years after the Court of Appeal ruled that his killer had received an unduly lenient sentence.
Vickrum Digwa, 23, stabbed the 18-year-old to death in Southampton in December last year using a large ceremonial dagger which he carried as a member of the Nihang order of Sikhs.
Delivering judgment on Thursday (5), Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr said the original sentence did not adequately reflect the overall seriousness of the murder, particularly the repeated use of the weapon against an unarmed victim and the cruelty that followed the attack.
She said the fact that Digwa had initially been entitled to carry the blade for religious reasons did not reduce the seriousness of his subsequent unlawful use of it.
“The fact that the knife’s initial carriage had been lawful does not reduce the seriousness of its subsequent unlawful use,” she said.
The court quashed the original 21-year minimum term and substituted a 25-year term. Judges also refused Digwa permission to challenge the length of his sentence.
The ruling followed challenges brought by the attorney general, Ellie Reeves, who argued that the sentence was too lenient, and Digwa, who maintained that it was too long.
Court distinguishes religious right from criminal use
The case has brought renewed attention to the legal exemption allowing practising Sikhs to carry bladed articles in public for religious reasons.
Sikhs are required to carry a kirpan, a small ceremonial blade, as one of the five articles of faith. Digwa also carried a larger dagger in a sheath, which the sentencing judge said was associated with his membership of the Nihang order, whose tradition includes carrying a second knife.
During the appeal hearing, Jonathan Polnay KC, representing the attorney general, argued that Digwa had abused the religious privilege afforded to Sikhs by using the weapon to carry out repeated lethal violence.
Imran Khan KC, representing Digwa, argued that carrying a knife for religious reasons should not, in itself, lead to harsher sentences for Sikh offenders.

He said the trial judge had already taken account of the dangerous weapon and the abuse of religious privilege when determining the original sentence.
Lady Carr said the trial judge had been entitled to use 15 years as the starting point because Digwa had not taken the large dagger to the scene intending to commit a crime.
However, she concluded that a substantial increase was necessary to reflect the circumstances of the killing and what happened afterwards.
False racism claim and filming of dying student
The judges identified two major aspects of the offence which they said had been understated in the original sentencing decision.
One was the repeated use of a large and readily available dagger with the intention of killing an unarmed man. The other was the deliberate cruelty, additional suffering and obstruction that followed the stabbing.
Digwa stabbed Nowak five times on December 3, 2025, as the student was walking home after a night out.
When police arrived, Digwa falsely claimed that Nowak had racially abused him and knocked off his turban. Officers subsequently handcuffed the injured student before recognising the seriousness of his wounds.
Body-worn camera footage later showed Nowak repeatedly telling officers that he had been stabbed and was struggling to breathe.
The murder sparked widespread anger and unrest in Southampton after footage of the police response emerged. Twelve officers and a police dog were injured during protests following the release of the body-worn video.
Mother abandons appeal as family faces further anguish
In a separate development on Thursday, Digwa’s mother Kiran Kaur, 53, abandoned her appeal against her three-year prison sentence for assisting an offender.

Kaur was convicted after removing the dagger from the scene and taking it to the family home, where it was hidden in her son's bedroom.
No reason was given for her decision to abandon the challenge. She is expected to be eligible for early release in December under the government's scheme allowing qualifying prisoners serving fixed-term sentences to be released after completing a third of their term.
Nowak's parents have strongly criticised the prospect of her release.
His mother, Lucy Ross, told ITV News: “She's lucky enough that she could go and see her boy. I have to go to Henry's grave to see Henry.”
His father, Mark Nowak, described the prospect as an “absolute disgrace”, adding: “She'll be out for Christmas, and I won't have Christmas with Henry.”
Meanwhile, home secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced an independent review led by former lord chancellor Alex Chalk into the circumstances surrounding Nowak's murder, including any missed opportunities to intervene.
Investigations by His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services and the Independent Office for Police Conduct are also examining Hampshire Police's handling of the incident, including whether race or religion influenced officers' decisions.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
News
Study attributes decline in academic freedom to restriction of free speech
Vibhuti Pathak
05 April 2024












