Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

An outward facing Britain

BREXIT IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY FOR UK TO TRADE WORLDWIDE

By Suella Fernandes


Conservative MP fpr Fareham

As a country, we are about to embark on a great journey of national self-determination. We must rediscover and build our identity as a great trading nation, an outward looking nation and a nation that has every reason to be confident in its future.

The Government has rejected staying in the Customs Union and the Single Market. This is absolutely right. If we are to realise our aspiration of becoming a self-governing, global-facing democracy, we cannot remain signed up to the Single Market or Customs Union.

The question now before Government and Parliament is how we best implement the will of the British people to make the most of this great opportunity. So now is the time to think carefully about what direction we wish to take our trade policy.

First, the EU Customs Union has not served the UK’s trade interests. The EU has a risible track record of securing trade agreements with key markets for the UK. Yes, some are significant, such as with South Korea, Mexico and South Africa, but the lack of trade agreements with major economies such as India, the USA and China, and the absence of multilateral trade deals is holding back the world economy. The recent deal with Canada took about 10 years but almost failed.

The UK can only strike new trade deals with non-EU countries if it is outside the Customs Union because of the Common Commercial Policy which binds all its members. Once the UK has left the EU and then seeks new free trade agreements with the world’s largest economies, as the Legatum Special Trade Commission has indicated, we will see and estimated 50 per cent increase in global world product over 15 years to reverse the stagnation in the Eurozone.

Second, EU protectionism is harming Britain, ultimately harming consumers. They are denied products such as cheaper sugar from developing states in order to protect less efficient farmers in Northern Europe . The EU Customs Union has pushed food and clothes prices up, by virtue of the Common External Tariff, estimated at over £500 a year for each household. By opening the market, lowering the barriers to entry to new competition, prices fall and consumers benefit. Choice and quality also goes up as producers no longer have a captive market or a monopoly.

Third, the EU’s trade agreements have focused too much on goods, ie agriculture, textiles, audiovisual and automotive, rather than liberalising services  and new industries? When 80 per cent of the UK GDP is services, and there are no real agreements on services then the UK is losing out. The EU economy does not aim at building the economies of the future.

Last, the protectionism of the EU severely penalises farmers and workers in developing countries when they export to the EU? For example, the EU imposes a tariff of 7.5 per cent on roasted coffee coming into the single market but 30 per cent on processed cocoa products such as chocolate bars. The effect of these tariffs is to stop African countries from accessing the EU market on a level playing field. More damaging is that there is no incentive for African countries to invest in vitally needed industrialisation, like agricultural processing, packaging and distribution. This is exactly the kind of investment Africa requires in order to lift itself out of poverty towards self-sufficiency. The EU’s policy of stifling competition and cannot claim to be a friend of fair trade.

Trade is the best way to lift developing states out of poverty, increase jobs and growth.

That’s the case for leaving the Customs Union and we have seen prime minister Theresa May set out very clearly in the Lancaster House speech her intention to do just that- emphatically, unequivocally and definitively.

In leaving the EU, the UK’s new settlement should embrace free trade, enabling Britain to control its flows of foreign workers. A free trade agreement with Britain is certainly in the interests of Spain and Italy, who run a trade surplus with Britain. For Germany, which exports 50 billion euros more to the UK than Britian buys from Germans, it’s a no-brainer. Cars, chemicals and machinery are strong export sectors for Germany which are all at risk if Britain copies EU tariffs on cars and imposes its own regulation on hazardous chemicals. The same goes for French farmers and winemakers who don’t want to see duties on their exports. Moreover, the French government has strong invested interests in the British nuclear and transport sectors, including rail and automotive.

The benefits for both sides are clear. Brexit is a golden opportunity for Britain.

More For You

Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
(From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

Sunder Katwala

“SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

Keep ReadingShow less