CONGRESS PARTY LEADER ‘IMPRESSED’ DURING TWO-DAY UK VISIT.
EVEN Narendra Modi’s supporters in the UK – and there are many of them in the Indian community – will concede that Congress president Rahul Gandhi made a good
impression during his two-day trip to London last week.
“Not as dumb as I thought he would be,” a student was heard to remark after Rahul had addressed some 400 students at the London School of Economics.
And at the lunch hosted for him at the St James’ Court Hotel by the Indian Journalists’ Association (IJA), which from his point of view was the key event in terms of influencing
opinion back home, an invited correspondent admitted: “He impressed me more than I had
thought he would.”
Among other guests, quite a few said afterwards: “No quarter given (by the IJA), but he was honest.”
Modi, who swept to power with an overall majority in a stunning victory in 2014, faces a general election next year. Most experts expect Modi to be returned to power though with a greatly reduced majority. There is no use denying there isn’t deep concern about issues
such as beef lynchings of Muslims.
At one level, the battle will be between Modi and Rahul, though the latter could not be persuaded to say he was the preferred prime ministerial candidate of the combined
opposition parties.
If Modi wishes to be returned to power, his supporters in the UK should advise him that extremist elements in his party who have terrorised minority groups have to be curbed. Back in 1977, after Indira Gandhi’s state of emergency and her son Sanjay’s forcible sterilisation campaign, Congress did not win a single seat in its heartland of Uttar
Pradesh and Bihar. But in 1980, she was returned to power.
Voters in India often give parties landslide wins only to kick them out a few years later. Rahul becoming the next prime minister is still a long shot but, on the basis of his
performance in London last week, it cannot be entirely ruled out.
The enigma of departure for Sir VS Naipaul
SIR VS NAIPAUL was a global figure, which explains why in newspapers throughout the world there is still speculation as to when his funeral will be held.
I can reveal that it has taken place.
It was an “invitation only” affair last Tuesday (22) at West London Crematorium in Kensal Green Cemetery. Only 80-100 of the author’s closest friends and a handful of his relatives were present.
His funeral was a non-religious affair. However, Geordie Greig, the new editor of the Daily Mail who gave a sympathetic farewell address assessing Naipaul’s literary legacy, slipped in a couple of lines from the holy Hindu text, the Bhagavad Gita.
Another speaker was his literary agent, Andrew Wylie, who had come from New York.
There was a reading from Naipaul’s 1987 “autobiographical novel”, The Enigma of Arrival.
The music included The Lark Ascending by Vaughan Williams, an English classic, and Doris Day’s Dream A Little Dream of Me, which concluded sweetly with the lyrics, “Sweet dreams till sunbeams find you/ Sweet dreams that leave all worries far behind you/ But in your
dreams whatever they be/ Dream a little dream of me.
Lunch afterwards was at Naipaul’s favourite restaurant, the Bombay Brasserie, where he and the Pakistani journalist Nadira Alvi had held their wedding celebration in 1996.
Naipaul’s main hope was that after his passing, his books would live on.
We need a few more books on Naipaul the man – one from Geordie Greig; another from Lady Naipaul; a view of the author through the edited diaries of his first wife, Patricia, whom he married at 22 after they met at Oxford; and, perhaps, most important, about his relationship with India, which began with the prickly An Area of Darkness in 1964, but evolved into a deeper understanding of the land of his forefathers. There also remains
room for a book on Naipaul’s complex relationship with the Caribbean and especially with Trinidad.
Being born there, he had once said, had been a “mistake”.
Boyle exits Bond
TO ME and other admirers of Danny Boyle (right), his departure from the next Bond movie has been disappointing.
In 2009, I went to LA for the Oscars for what turned out to be one of the biggest stories in Indian and British cinema history. Slumdog Millionaire swept the board with eight Oscars, including Best Director for Boyle. It also put its lead pair, Freida Pinto and Dev Patel, on the map.
I had hoped that for the 25th Bond movie in the franchise, Boyle might have called in his
Bollywood connections and perhaps even chosen some Indian locations and stars.
There is speculation that a possible delay in production might mean that Craig, who is 50,
may now be considered too old for what was meant to be his fifth and final outing as 007.
After it was announced that Boyle would no longer direct the Bond movie because of “creative differences” with Michael G Wilson, Barbara Broccoli and Craig, I turned to one of the leading experts on the subject – Ajay Chowdhury.
He and co-author Matthew Fielding have just updated their scholarly Some Kind of Hero:
The Remarkable Story of the James Bond Films (The History Press ; £20).
Ajay, who is also spokesperson for the James Bond International Fan Club, established
in 1979, confides that his sympathies are more with the producers.
“Albert R Broccoli’s Eon Productions have been doing this a lot longer,” Ajay said. “Barbara
Broccoli's creative instincts have been ahead of the curve. Boyle might have been too brave a choice. Of course, Boyle’s Bond is now a tantalising ‘what if ’… But long-term Bondophiles
keep faith with the Broccolis.”
As for the “creative differences”, Ajay thinks that the “story and scale might have been the key points of debate, but it is pure speculation at this stage. Eon is a well-oiled team and Michael G Wilson and Barbara Broccoli have been decisive now – a stitch in time may have saved 007.”
US briefing at India Club
IT IS very encouraging that the US embassy chose the India Club for a media briefing last week.
The venue faces a new threat from Marston Properties who appear determined to demolish
the historic venue despite being denied planning permission by Westminster Council. The briefing was by Helaena W White, London-based spokesperson for India-US relations
and south Asian affairs generally.
It was held ahead of talks in Delhi next Thursday (6) between Mike Pompeo and James Mattis, the US secretary of state and the defence secretary respectively, and their Indian counterparts.
The strategic choice of the India Club was that of Anwar Hasan, the US embassy’s south Asia media specialist. He had frequented the India Club during his days working as a journalist at nearby Bush House.
US president Donald Trump gestures next to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ben Gurion International Airport as Trump leaves Israel en route to Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, to attend a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a US-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Lod, Israel, October 13, 2025.
‘They make a desert and call it peace’, wrote the Roman historian Tacitus. That was an early exercise, back in AD 96, of trying to walk in somebody else’s shoes. The historian was himself the son-in-law of the Roman Governor of Britain, yet he here imagined the rousing speech of a Caledonian chieftain to give voice to the opposition to that imperial conquest.
Nearly two thousand years later, US president Donald Trump this week headed to Sharm-El-Sheikh in the desert, to join the Egyptian, Turkish and Qatari mediators of the Gaza ceasefire. Twenty more world leaders, including prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and president Emmanuel Macron of France turned up too to witness this ceremonial declaration of peace in Gaza.
This ceasefire brings relief after two years of devastating pain. Tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. More of the Israeli hostages taken by Hamas are returning dead than alive. Eighty-five per cent of Gaza is rubble. Each of the twenty steps of the proposed peace plan may prove rocky. The state of Palestine has more recognition - in principle - than ever before across the international community, but it may be a long road to that taking practical form. Israel continues to oppose a Palestinian state.
The ceasefire will be welcomed in Britain for humanitarian relief and rekindling hopes of a path to a political settlement. It offers an opportunity to take stock on the fissures of the last two years on community relations here in Britain too. That was the theme of a powerful cross-faith conversation last week, convened by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to reciprocate the expressions of solidarity received from Muslims, Christians and others after the Manchester synagogue attacks, and challenge the arson attack on a Sussex mosque.
Jewish and Muslim civic voices had convened an ‘optimistic alliance’ to keep conversations going when there seemed ever less to be optimistic about. The emerging news from Gaza was seen as a hopeful basis to deepen conversation in Britain about how tackling the causes of both antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice could form part of a shared commitment to cohesion.
This conflict has not seen a Brexit-style polarisation down the middle of British society. Most people’s first instinct was to avoid choosing a side in this conflict. The murderous Hamas attack on Jews on October 7, 2023 and the excesses of the Israeli assault on Gaza piled tragedy upon tragedy. The instinct to not take sides can be an expression of mutual empathy, but is not always so noble. It can reflect confusion and exhaustion with this seemingly intractable conflict. A tendency to look away and change the subject can frustrate those whose family heritage, faith solidarity or commitments to Zionism and Palestine as political ideas make them feel more closely connected.
Others have felt this conflict thrust upon them in an unwelcome way - including British Jews fed up with the antisemitic idea that they can be held responsible at school, university or work for what the government of Israel is doing. Protesters for Palestine perceive double standards in arguments about free speech - as do those with contrasting views. The proper boundaries between legitimate political protest and prejudice are sharply contested.
Hamit Coksun is an asylum seeker who speaks somewhat broken English. He would seem an unusual ally for Robert Jenrick. Yet the shadow justice secretary went to court to offer solidarity, after Coskun had burned a Qu’ran outside the Turkish Embassy, while shouting “F__ Islam” and “Islam is the religion of terrorism”. He had been fined £250, but the appeal court overturned his conviction. The judgment was context-specific: this specific incendiary protest took place outside an embassy, not a place of worship, in an empty street, and did not direct the comments at anybody in particular.
The law does not protect faiths from criticism, and indeed offers some protection for intolerant and prejudiced political speech too, though the police can place conditions on protest to protect people from abuse, intimidation or harassment on the basis of their faith.
So it can be legal to performatively burn books - holy or otherwise - though this verdict makes clear it does not offer a green light to do so in every context.
But how far should we celebrate those who choose to burn books? Cosun advocates banning the Qu’ran, making him a flawed champion of free speech. Jenrick is legitimately concerned to show that there are no laws against blasphemy in Britain, but could anybody imagine that he would turn up in person to show solidarity to a man burning the Bible, Bhagvad Gita or Torah, shouting profanities to declaring religion of war or genocide? The court’s defence of the right to shock, offend and provoke is correct in law. Those are hardly the only conversations that a shared society needs.
Sunder Katwalawww.easterneye.biz
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.