Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Nair’s Suitable journey

By Amit Roy

AS A SUITABLE BOY ended on the BBC on Monday (24), its director, Mira Nair, had a virtual lunch with the Financial Times (FT) from her “book-lined study in Manhat­tan’s Upper West Side”.


It is from here that she remotely completed edit­ing the six-part adaptation of Vikram Seth’s novel, “collaborating with col­leagues across the globe – the UK, Australia, Los Angeles, Budapest (where an orchestra has played the score) and India”.

The interview con­tained references to Nair’s second husband, “Indian-Ugandan aca­demic Mahmood Mam­dani, now a professor at Columbia University”; their son, Zohran K Mamdani, “who has just won the Democratic pri­mary for a New York state assembly seat, defeating a 10-year incumbent”; how she turned down the chance to direct the fourth Harry Potter mov­ie; and her plans to make a film about “one of the greatest modern artists of this world”, Amrita Sher- Gil, “a half-Hungarian, half-Indian painter who was famous in the inter­war years, then died trag­ically at the age of 28”.

Nair spoke of the com­plexity of Hindu-Muslim relationships that she had tried to put into A Suitable Boy: “I wanted to try to capture India’s beautiful intertwining that has always been our strength, but is now be­ing obliterated.”

She revealed what happened when she “tweeted enthusiastically about Lucknow’s new metro, where the map ro­tates between English, Hindi and Urdu”.

“I was so excited to see Urdu on a metro station,” Nair told the FT. “I took a picture of it and tweeted it. I said ‘Long Live Luc­know. My first Urdu on the metro!’ That is it. That is what I said. I was trolled by like 400 trolls saying, ‘Mira Nair loves the lan­guage of the invaders. Go back to Pakistan.’”

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

An anti-migrant protest in Glasgow’s Possilpark on July 11, 2026, amid rising tensions and violence over migration across parts of UK

Getty Images

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

Sunder Katwala

IT TOOK three nights of violence in Thetford, Norfolk for the police to restore order. A crowd chanted “get them out” and “deport, deport, deport” as they pelted a house with eggs and smashed the windows. Several dozen people tried to break down the door, hoping to confront the people inside, violently attacking the police who blocked them.

This violent criminality was not political protest, but an attempt at a xenophobic pogrom to drive out asylum seekers housed in the property. The police relocated them elsewhere for their own safety. That felt like ‘mission accomplished’ for the angry crowd. Online, extremists suggested other places could target asylum seekers’ homes to emulate Thetford’s success. Disorder in Belfast and Epping had seen a crime, committed by an asylum seeker, used to mobilise collective punishment against migrants and other ethnic minorities. Nobody involved in the Thetford disorder suggested those in the house targeted had caused any trouble. The mere presence of asylum seekers in the town was perceived as a threat – from “illegals” or “invaders”.

Keep ReadingShow less