Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Nair’s Suitable journey

By Amit Roy

AS A SUITABLE BOY ended on the BBC on Monday (24), its director, Mira Nair, had a virtual lunch with the Financial Times (FT) from her “book-lined study in Manhat­tan’s Upper West Side”.


It is from here that she remotely completed edit­ing the six-part adaptation of Vikram Seth’s novel, “collaborating with col­leagues across the globe – the UK, Australia, Los Angeles, Budapest (where an orchestra has played the score) and India”.

The interview con­tained references to Nair’s second husband, “Indian-Ugandan aca­demic Mahmood Mam­dani, now a professor at Columbia University”; their son, Zohran K Mamdani, “who has just won the Democratic pri­mary for a New York state assembly seat, defeating a 10-year incumbent”; how she turned down the chance to direct the fourth Harry Potter mov­ie; and her plans to make a film about “one of the greatest modern artists of this world”, Amrita Sher- Gil, “a half-Hungarian, half-Indian painter who was famous in the inter­war years, then died trag­ically at the age of 28”.

Nair spoke of the com­plexity of Hindu-Muslim relationships that she had tried to put into A Suitable Boy: “I wanted to try to capture India’s beautiful intertwining that has always been our strength, but is now be­ing obliterated.”

She revealed what happened when she “tweeted enthusiastically about Lucknow’s new metro, where the map ro­tates between English, Hindi and Urdu”.

“I was so excited to see Urdu on a metro station,” Nair told the FT. “I took a picture of it and tweeted it. I said ‘Long Live Luc­know. My first Urdu on the metro!’ That is it. That is what I said. I was trolled by like 400 trolls saying, ‘Mira Nair loves the lan­guage of the invaders. Go back to Pakistan.’”

More For You

Britain’s fractured vote leaves Starmer fighting for survival

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

Britain’s fractured vote leaves Starmer fighting for survival

Sunder Katwala

Impatience for change was the core message of the May 7 election results – but voters remain sharply divided about who might deliver it.

Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer sought to acknowledge public frustration with his government and his own leadership, by pledging to deliver bigger change, with greater urgency, if given the chance to keep calm and carry on in dangerous times. But his speech on Monday (11) failed to stem public calls from an increasing number of his backbench MPs – backed up, privately, by some cabinet colleagues – for Starmer to offer a timetable for a leadership change.

Keep ReadingShow less