Gayathri Kallukaran is a Junior Journalist with Eastern Eye. She has a Master’s degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from St. Paul’s College, Bengaluru, and brings over five years of experience in content creation, including two years in digital journalism. She covers stories across culture, lifestyle, travel, health, and technology, with a creative yet fact-driven approach to reporting. Known for her sensitivity towards human interest narratives, Gayathri’s storytelling often aims to inform, inspire, and empower. Her journey began as a layout designer and reporter for her college’s daily newsletter, where she also contributed short films and editorial features. Since then, she has worked with platforms like FWD Media, Pepper Content, and Petrons.com, where several of her interviews and features have gained spotlight recognition. Fluent in English, Malayalam, Tamil, and Hindi, she writes in English and Malayalam, continuing to explore inclusive, people-focused storytelling in the digital space.
Nadiya Hussain confirms BBC will not renew her cookery series
Bake Off winner challenges expectations to remain “grateful”
She says hard work and talent, not luck, brought her success
Celebrities, including Annie Lennox and Fearne Cotton, show support
BBC ends decade-long collaboration with Bake Off star
Nadiya Hussain has spoken out after the BBC decided not to commission another cookery programme with her. The popular TV chef, who won The Great British Bake Off in 2015, shared her views on social media, stating that she “won’t always be grateful” and should not be expected to remain silent about career setbacks.
The decision ends a nearly 10-year working relationship between the broadcaster and Hussain, who has hosted several well-received cookery shows under the BBC banner. In her latest Instagram video, she addressed the public’s reaction and emphasised her right to expect more from her career.
“Gratitude shouldn't be a muzzle”
In a video message posted on Instagram, Hussain said she had received numerous messages urging her to be grateful following the show's cancellation. She described how growing up in an immigrant household had shaped her understanding of gratitude.
“Grateful for being let in, grateful for having work—even if underpaid, grateful for safety—even if it meant silence,” she explained. “Gratitude became something that I was expected to wear like a uniform.”
She continued: “I am allowed to feel more than just thankful. I am a human being, and I am allowed to feel angry when I’m treated unfairly. I’m allowed to want better for myself and for my family.”
Challenging the idea that people from marginalised backgrounds must constantly express gratitude for any opportunities, she said: “We didn’t come here just to survive; we came here to live, to grow, to contribute, to belong—not as a guest, but as a person who has rights and dreams and dignity.”
Hussain concluded, “So no, I won’t always be grateful. I got here through hard work, through determination, through talent. I got here because I’m good at what I do.”
Nadiya’s message received widespread support from fans and fellow public figures. TV presenter Fearne Cotton responded with a series of heart emojis, while musician Annie Lennox praised her statement, writing: “Gratitude should never become a silencing muzzle—as you so rightly say!”
Rahul Mandal, who won Bake Off in 2018, commented: “So true. Thanks so much for speaking up.” TV doctor Amir Khan also backed her remarks, stating: “Exactly this! Well said.”
Nadiya’s track record with the BBC
Since winning Bake Off when it aired on the BBC, Hussain has fronted several successful cookery series for the broadcaster. These include Nadiya Bakes, Nadiya’s Fast Flavours, and Nadiya’s Simple Spices. She is also a published author of cookbooks and children’s titles.
Earlier this month, the BBC issued a statement on the programming decision: “After several wonderful series, we have made the difficult decision not to commission another cookery show with Nadiya Hussain at the moment.”
However, the broadcaster emphasised that it remains open to future collaborations and that Nadiya is “a much-valued part of the BBC family”.
What’s next for Nadiya?
While a new BBC project is not in the pipeline, Nadiya has hinted at future ventures. In a previous post addressing the show’s cancellation, she said she is now focusing on “being [her] most authentic self” and is looking forward to working with people who “believe in [her] talent”.
She also reassured her followers that “exciting” new projects are on the way.
Protesters gather outside the Royal Courts of Justice in central London on October 13, 2025, as The High Court decides in a three-month trial whether systems installed in Mercedes, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Nissan diesel vehicles were designed to cheat clean air laws.
A MAJOR trial involving five global carmakers opened at London’s High Court on Monday, nearly ten years after the Volkswagen emissions scandal exposed the use of software designed to cheat pollution tests.
The court will determine in a three-month hearing whether systems installed in diesel vehicles made by Mercedes-Benz, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Nissan were designed to cheat clean air laws. The five manufacturers are accused of using illegal “defeat devices” that made cars appear less polluting during testing than they were on the road.
The case, one of the largest mass lawsuits in English legal history, involves 1.6 million motorists suing 14 carmakers, including Jaguar Land Rover, Toyota, Vauxhall-Opel and BMW. The current trial focuses on five lead defendants and is expected to set a precedent for other manufacturers, potentially paving the way for billions of pounds in compensation.
Martyn Day, lawyer at Leigh Day representing the claimants, said the case impacts “nearly all the manufacturers in this country.” He told AFP, “It is a huge case for the British public,” adding that it could lead to “serious amounts of compensation.”
Lawyers for the claimants say the devices detected when vehicles were being tested and ensured emissions were kept within legal limits, but did not do so in normal driving conditions. The five manufacturers deny the allegations and say their systems were legally and technically justified.
Mercedes and Ford have rejected the claims as having “no merit,” while Nissan declined to comment. French carmakers Renault and Stellantis, which owns Peugeot and Citroen, said their vehicles complied with regulations in place at the time.
The High Court’s decision will be binding on hundreds of thousands of similar claims against other manufacturers, including Vauxhall/Opel and BMW. Any damages the court might rule should be paid will be decided at a further trial next year.
Adam Kamenetzky, one of the claimants, said he felt “defrauded” after buying a Mercedes SUV in 2018 believing it was less polluting than other models. “We live in a built-up neighbourhood in London where there are children with lungs that can be harmed immeasurably by the emissions that these cars are producing,” he told AFP.
The dieselgate scandal first broke in 2015 when Volkswagen admitted fitting millions of vehicles with software to make engines appear less polluting in tests. The case triggered investigations and lawsuits against several major carmakers worldwide.
In 2020, the High Court found Volkswagen had used defeat devices to cheat emissions tests. The company settled the case in 2022, paying £193 million ($259 million) to 91,000 British motorists without admitting liability. Globally, Volkswagen has paid more than 32 billion euros ($37 billion) in fines, vehicle refits, and legal costs.
The latest group of claims in the UK, covering 14 manufacturers, is far larger than the VW case. Claimants’ lawyers have previously estimated the litigation’s total value at around £6 billion.
Courts and regulators around the world have since pursued investigations into diesel emissions. In July, a Dutch court ruled that diesel cars sold by Stellantis brands Opel, Peugeot-Citroen and DS contained defeat devices, a decision Stellantis said was wrong. Automakers have also faced fines and settlements in the United States and elsewhere.
Day said, “The vehicles looked less polluting during the testing, but as soon as you were outside the testing regime, those emission levels went massively up.”
The current UK trial will decide whether the carmakers are liable before any compensation phase begins next year.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.