Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Modi tenure criticised

by Amit Roy

THE Guardian has been critical of Narendra Modi since he was chief minister of Gujarat, so it wasn’t surprising that it came out with a portentous leader comment about India’s prime


minister last week, saying the next general election will be “something deeper about the

struggle for India’s soul”.

The left-leaning paper alleged Modi’s government has been unable to create nearly enough

new jobs, failed to admit its failure, offered electoral sops in the latest budget, and witnessed “a 28 per cent jump in the number of incidents of communal violence, including lynchings of Muslims” since he came to power.

“Mr Modi prefers to campaign on his own reality,” said the Guardian. “In a break with Indian political tradition, the prime minister has never held a traditional press conference.”

It added: “Despite impressive rates of growth for decades, many of India’s poorest people have yet to feel the benefits. Mr Modi trumpets India as the fastest-growing major economy in the world. He’s not too keen about the fact that very little has trickled down in the form of jobs.”

Although the Guardian won’t influence voters in India, it has contributed to trashing Modi’s

reputation in Britain – probably irreparably. Among readers, Modi’s supporters and critics

appear equally matched.

One in the former group said: “Wow, what has Guardian got against Narendra Modi? …the constant Modi bashing by Guardian makes me sick.”

Another protested: “Why does the Guardian use the word ‘regime’ to describe his government? Do they ever refer to the May regime or the Merkel regime? This is extremely bad and biased use of language.”

Meanwhile, a critic suggested: “He’s a religious extremist – and if unvetted journalists were

permitted to ask actual questions his bigoted sectarian approach would be obvious – so like

any self-respecting despot, you simply avoid it by not being interviewed.”

What I found enlightening is that when I wrote to several influential figures in the British Indian community asking them for their views on the article, the response was a revealing silence.

Only Virendra Sharma, the Labour MP for Ealing Southall, replied: “After five years, the best placed to make a judgement are the Indian people. Later this year the largest democratic exercise in the world will take place and they will decide on prime minister Modi’s record.”

More For You

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

A billboard featuring Narendra Modi and Sir Keir Starmer welcomes the British leader along a street in Mumbai

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

THERE has been very little substantive coverage of Sir Keir Starmer’s first visit to India as prime minister in the British press.

One paper ignored the visit altogether, preferring to devote three pages to something it considered far more important – David and Victoria Beckham. There was also the regular instalment of just how awful Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is, especially when compared to Kate, the Princess of Wales. One paper did have a story, but it was about how Starmer would not liberalise visas for India.

Keep ReadingShow less