Plans to cut immigration will have serious serious consequences, say experts
By SARWAR ALAMDec 02, 2023
ANY “drastic” measures to cut immigration to the UK have the potential to “kill the economy”, a leading businessman has told Eastern Eye.
Annual net migration hit a record of 745,000 last year and has stayed at elevated levels since, data showed last Thursday (23). Prime minister Rishi Sunak came under pressure from within his own party to act and reduce the numbers in the run-up to an election next year.
Sunak admitted immigration levels were “too high” and that the Conservative government would leave “no stone unturned” to cut immigration.
Kemi Badonech, the business and trade secretary, said on Monday (27) she was pushing for “much, much tougher” immigration measures.
Kemi Badonech
However, Lord Karan Bilimoria, who set up Cobra beer and previously led the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) told Eastern Eye, “The measures that are being spoken about, you’re not just going to hamper growing the economy, you’re going to kill the economy.”
Former home secretary Suella Braverman, who was sacked by Sunak in November, claimed this week the prime minister had verbally agreed to a four-point plan to address migration concerns. Among the apparently agreed proposals was one to increase the minimum salary threshold for a foreign skilled worker to be raised from the current £26,000 to £40,000.
Bilimoria, the former president and current vice-president of the CBI, said raising the threshold would have “dire consequences” for UK businesses.
“Every sector that I speak to is experiencing labour shortages, whether it's technology, IT sector, health, agriculture, finance - everyone is experiencing labour shortages,” the peer said.
“If you want the economy to grow, then one way is to upskill domestically; that's a long-term solution which we must continue to do.
“The other is, you have to let in the workforce the economy needs from abroad and activate the shortage occupation list, which the government does very reluctantly from time to time with a very few sectors.”
Lord Karan Bilimoria
Jonathan Portes, professor of Economics and Public Policy at Kings College London, and a senior fellow at the UK in a Changing Europe (UKICE). He told Eastern Eye that rather than attacking immigration, the government should be looking at its own “failures”.
“Immigration is certainly good for economic growth, for tax revenues, and also in some specific sectors immigration is helping to fill gaps,” said Portes.
He added that forecasts suggest an increase in net migration will boost the annual tax revenue by around £18bn in four years’ time.
“On the other hand, we clearly have a shortage of houses and the successive governments have failed to reform the system of housing supply in this country, both for people we have and people arriving. That's not the fault of the immigrants, but it's certainly a serious problem.”
He added: “My view is that the current immigration system works pretty well. There are always things you could do to improve it. There are issues with, in particular the social care sector, which is the single biggest source of for work related migration.
“The problem is that we don't pay and train and value social care workers enough, which results in British people don’t want to work in that sector, understandably.”
Jonathan Portes
Portes added that lowering immigration wasn’t a “magic solution” and that it would have serious consequences.
“We can continue to have lots of migration for people who work in social care, that's one choice. Or we can pay people pay (British) care workers quite a lot more and raise taxes or do something else to fund it or we can just not have enough care workers,” he said.
“We can’t lower migration, not pay higher taxes, and have enough care workers, that is not possible. Lowering immigration have very serious downsides.”
Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that the UK granted 486,107 study visas to main applicants in the year ending September 2023, with Indians continuing to be the leading nationality, receiving over a quarter of study visas (133,237).
Students and their dependents made up 39 per cent (378,000) of long-term non-EU immigrants to the UK in the year ending June 2023.
Those who have already completed their degree can stay in the UK for two years (three years for those with a doctoral degree) to work under a graduate visa.
However, in May, the government announced that from 2024 only students on postgraduate courses designated as research programmes - typically lasting longer than two years - will be able to bring dependants to the UK while they study.
Sunak said the government's plans to clamp down on dependents of students arriving in the UK is “the single toughest measure that anyone has taken to bring down the levels of legal migration in a very long time”.
Bilimoria said he was “perplexed” at the scrutiny faced by foreign students. He has been campaigning for years to remove the number of foreign students from net migration figure, arguing many students don’t stay for the required one year in order to be added to the net migration figure.
“The government just won't listen. I don't understand it. I've asked on the floor of the House of Lords many times, I've got cross party support when I asked that question, ‘why don't you exclude them and treat them as temporary migrants?’ I don't get an answer from the government. Why are they doing this deliberately? Why are they making a rod for their own back?” said Bilimoria.
Three years ago, the government set a target to increase the number of international students enrolled at UK universities from 470,000 in 2018 to 600,000 by 2030.
That target has already been exceeded — figures from the Higher Education Statistics Agency show 680,000 international students enrolled in 2021-22.
The economic benefit international students bring to the UK has jumped by a third in those three years, boosting the economy by an estimated £42bn in 2021-2022, according to an analysis by London Economics.
Bilimoria warned that cutting down on opportunities offered to foreign students would lead to the UK losing out on the best global talent to its competitors.
“There are people who want to reduce the two-year postgraduate visa and if they do that, the numbers will drop significantly because we will lose the best talent to other countries like Australia, who already offer a five-year post-graduate visa. We offer three years for PhD postgraduate work experience, they offer six years,” said Bilimoria, who is chancellor of Birmingham University.
“We are competing on the global stage. We're competing with countries in Europe that offer scholarships to international students. We're competing with America. We're competing with Canada.”
Immigration minister Robert Jenrick has drawn up plans to cut immigration, which he shared with the government last week.
Robert Jenrick (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)
Among the proposals is the scrapping of the shortage occupation list, a programme that allows foreign workers to be paid 20 per cent below the going rate in roles where there are fewer skilled workers.
“When we had the lorry driver crisis two years ago, the government refused to activate the shortage occupation list and we had a real crisis. Eventually they let the lorry drivers in,” said Bilimoria. “We've got to have the workforce we need if we want the economy to grow. We will need to bring in the best workforce that's required for every sector in this economy from abroad.”
Among Jenrick’s other proposals are to restrict foreign health and care workers to bringing one relative each to the UK. Some reports suggest the Home Office could ban them from bringing dependents altogether.
Other plans being considered are to cap the number of NHS and social care workers hired from abroad.
The latest NHS data shows as of June 2023 there were 264,822 non-British staff working across the NHS – 18.7 per cent of all workers. This was up from 222,107 the year before.
Within the adult social care sector, at the end of 2022-23, 291,000 of the 1.2 million staff were recorded as non-British, with 192,000 from outside of the EU.
However, despite utilising foreign workers, the NHS still recorded 112,000 vacant posts this summer while social care recorded 152,000.
Dr Chaand Nagpaul, the former head of the British Medical Association (BMA), hit out at the “cruel, blanket judgements made in response to the immigration figures”.
Dr Chaand Nagpaul
“The NHS would collapse without immigration of healthcare staff,” Nagpaul told Eastern Eye. “In fact, given the acute workforce shortage, lives would be lost if we didn’t have a continued influx of migrant doctors, nurses.
“Currently, more than 50 per cent of doctors in any one year come from abroad. If that didn’t happen, we would see NHS waiting lists, which are already at a record level, escalate further, and patients would literally come to harm.”
However, a number of right-wing Tory MPs have called on the prime minister to take drastic action to reduce immigration.
Former cabinet minister Sir Simon Clarke claimed the current level of immigration is “unsustainable both economically and socially.” It is “beyond our public services’ capacity to support and it undercuts UK productivity and wages by substituting cheaper foreign labour,” he said.
His fellow Tory MP, Jonathan Gullis, added that the figures were “completely unacceptable” and will “rightly anger” the British people.
Several cars burn on North Los Angeles street during clashes between protesters and police on June 8, 2025 in Downtown Los Angeles, California, US. (Photo: Getty Images)
PROTESTERS set fire to vehicles and clashed with police in Los Angeles on Sunday after President Donald Trump sent National Guard troops to the city. Officers kept crowds away from the troops, who had been deployed as unrest entered a third day.
The protests were triggered by recent immigration raids carried out by federal officials, which have led to the arrest of dozens of people identified by authorities as undocumented migrants and gang members.
The raids began in broad daylight on Friday in a city with a large Latino population. The deployment of California’s National Guard — usually controlled by the state’s governor — was criticised by opponents who said Trump was escalating tensions. Trump has made strict immigration enforcement a central part of his second-term agenda.
"We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved," California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X.
"This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California," he added.
At least three Waymo self-driving vehicles were set on fire on Sunday, and two others were vandalised as protesters moved through parts of downtown Los Angeles.
Traffic was stopped for over an hour on a major freeway while people gathered on the road. Officers from the California Highway Patrol dispersed them using flash-bangs and smoke grenades.
After a brief early confrontation outside a detention centre between Department of Homeland Security agents and a few dozen protesters, most clashes involved local police.
By early afternoon, Los Angeles Police Department officers set up containment lines away from federal buildings, keeping demonstrators from reaching armed National Guard troops from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, who were stationed in camouflage gear and helmets.
As night fell, groups of masked protesters remained in certain areas, with some throwing projectiles and fireworks.
The LAPD said 56 people had been arrested over two days, and three officers had sustained minor injuries.
‘Troops everywhere’
Trump defended the use of troops, suggesting more could be deployed in other parts of the country.
"You have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it," he told reporters. "I think you’re going to see some very strong law and order."
Asked if he would invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows the military to operate as domestic police, Trump said: "We’re looking at troops everywhere. We’re not going to let this happen to our country."
US Northern Command, part of the Department of Defense, said "approximately 500 Marines... are in a prepared-to-deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support" federal operations.
The National Guard is usually deployed for natural disasters or, occasionally, civil unrest, with the agreement of state officials.
Trump’s decision to send in the Guard without the governor’s consent is the first such move since 1965, during the civil rights era. Democrats, including former vice president Kamala Harris, criticised it. Harris called the move "a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos."
‘Intimidation’
Republicans supported Trump’s decision.
"I have no concern about that at all," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, accusing Newsom of "an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary".
Protesters told AFP they believed the deployment was meant to deter dissent.
"I think it’s an intimidation tactic," said Thomas Henning. "These protests have been peaceful. There’s no one trying to do any sort of damage right now and yet you have the National Guard with loaded magazines and large guns standing around trying to intimidate Americans from exercising our First Amendment rights."
Marshall Goldberg, 78, said the presence of the troops made him feel "so offended."
"We hate what they’ve done with the undocumented workers, but this is moving it to another level of taking away the right to protest and the right to just peaceably assemble," he told AFP.
ICE raids in other US cities have led to smaller protests in recent months, but the unrest in Los Angeles is the most significant reaction to Trump’s immigration policies so far.
A CBS News poll conducted before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority of Americans supported the immigration crackdown.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Alcaraz became the first man to win a Grand Slam after saving match point since Novak Djokovic defeated Roger Federer in the 2019 Wimbledon final.
CARLOS ALCARAZ came from two sets down to defeat Jannik Sinner in a five-set French Open final on Sunday, saving three championship points in a match that lasted five hours and 29 minutes.
Alcaraz, the defending champion, won 4-6, 6-7 (4/7), 6-4, 7-6 (7/3), 7-6 (10/2) to claim his fifth Grand Slam title. The 22-year-old remains unbeaten in Grand Slam finals and ended Sinner's 20-match winning streak in majors.
"This was the most exciting match that I've played so far without a doubt," said Alcaraz. "I think the match had everything."
The Spaniard completed his first-ever comeback from two sets down in what became the longest final in Roland Garros history. He saved three match points while trailing 5-3 in the fourth set.
"Today was all about believing in myself. Never doubted myself today and I tried to go for it," he said. "Real champions are made in those situations."
Alcaraz became the first man to win a Grand Slam after saving match point since Novak Djokovic defeated Roger Federer in the 2019 Wimbledon final. The only other man to do so in the Open era was Gaston Gaudio at Roland Garros in 2004.
Comeback from the brink
Sinner missed out on a third straight Grand Slam title, following wins at the 2023 US Open and 2024 Australian Open.
"It's easier to play than talking now," Sinner said. "I won't sleep very well tonight but it's OK.
"We try to delete it somehow and take the positive and keep going. There are no other ways," he said. "It hurts, but you cannot keep crying."
This was Sinner's fifth consecutive loss to Alcaraz and their first meeting in a Grand Slam final. It was also the first major final between two men born in the 2000s. Alcaraz now leads their head-to-head 8-4, having also beaten Sinner in the Rome final after the Italian returned from a three-month doping ban in May.
Set-by-set battle
Alcaraz started the final by creating three break points, but Sinner held and created his own chance soon after. Alcaraz broke in the fifth game to lead 3-2 but gave it back immediately. Sinner took the first set after breaking again at 5-4.
Sinner went up 3-0 in the second set and tightened his serve after facing seven break points in the first. Alcaraz broke back when Sinner served for the set, but Sinner won the tie-break with a series of strong points, including a cross-court forehand to finish.
Sinner then broke at the start of the third set, but Alcaraz responded by winning four straight games to go up 4-1. After losing serve at 5-3, Alcaraz broke to love to take the set, ending Sinner’s 31-set winning streak in Grand Slams.
The fourth set was close, with Sinner breaking for a 5-3 lead and reaching three match points. But Alcaraz broke back and forced a tie-break, which he won to take the match into a decider.
Dramatic final set
Alcaraz broke early in the fifth and held on despite pressure.
Sinner broke back while trailing 5-3 and went on a three-game run, forcing Alcaraz to hold serve to stay in the match.
Alcaraz held, and then dominated the 10-point tie-break, winning on his first championship point with a forehand winner.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
A Literary Celebration of Culture and Identity: Manzu Islam to Launch ‘Godzilla and the Songbird’ at Saudha International Literature Festival
On Saturday, 14 June, literary lovers, cultural critics and curious minds alike will gather at the historic Kobi Nazrul Centre in London’s East End for a standout event in the UK’s literary calendar—the launch of Godzilla and the Songbird, the latest book by acclaimed British Asian author Manzu Islam. Hosted as part of the prestigious Saudha International Literature Festival, the event promises to be an evening of dialogue, creativity and cultural resonance. Situated at 30 Hanbury Street, the Kobi Nazrul Centre offers the perfect setting for this multicultural celebration, named after the revered Bengali poet and playing a key role in London's intercultural arts scene.
Godzilla and the Songbird marks a compelling new addition to Manzu Islam’s growing body of work. Known for weaving deeply personal narratives with broader themes of diaspora, migration and dual identity, Islam is celebrated for his poetic voice and insightful prose. His latest novel is expected to push these boundaries further, exploring contradictions within modern life—between power and vulnerability, tradition and change, survival and artistic expression. Though full plot details are under wraps, the intriguing title itself suggests a rich metaphorical journey, likely combining mythological symbols with emotional depth.
This book launch isn’t merely a reading—it’s an occasion that aligns with Saudha Society for Poetry and Indian Music’s mission to break genre boundaries and nurture cross-cultural understanding. The Saudha International Literature Festival has earned a strong reputation for spotlighting global voices while fostering home-grown British talent, particularly those from South Asian backgrounds. By hosting Manzu Islam’s book release, the festival underlines its commitment to literary excellence that resonates across communities and continents.
Attendees can expect more than just a book signing. The event will likely feature readings, reflections from the author, and open discussions that invite the audience to engage with themes central to the novel and to the contemporary British Asian experience. Whether you're an academic interested in postcolonial narratives, a student of South Asian literature, or a local reader seeking meaningful cultural experiences, this event offers something profoundly enriching.
Manzu Islam has long been a voice of insight and integrity in British literature. His work has appeared in a variety of anthologies, and he has contributed essays, stories, and critiques that have shaped how British South Asian identity is represented in fiction today. This book launch is a rare opportunity to hear directly from the author in an intimate and culturally vibrant setting.
Admission to the event is free, though advance booking is highly recommended to secure a place. Tickets and further event information can be found at Eventbrite. As London continues to thrive as a multicultural hub for the arts, events like this remind us of the power of storytelling in shaping collective identity and community connection.
Don’t miss this literary highlight of the season—join Manzu Islam, Saudha Society, and a host of literature enthusiasts at the Kobi Nazrul Centre on Saturday, 14 June for an unforgettable evening that celebrates words, wisdom and the woven fabric of modern British life.
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. (Photo: Getty Images)
FORMER UK minister Tulip Siddiq has requested a meeting with Bangladesh’s chief adviser Muhammad Yunus in London to discuss what she called a “misunderstanding” related to corruption allegations against her.
In a letter dated June 4, Siddiq asked for a chance to meet Yunus during his visit to the UK from June 10 to 13. Yunus is expected to meet King Charles and visit Downing Street to meet Keir Starmer during the trip.
Siddiq said she hoped the meeting would “help clear up the misunderstanding perpetuated by the anti-corruption committee in Dhaka that I have questions to answer about my mother's sister, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina”.
“I am a UK citizen, born in London and representing the people of Hampstead and Highgate in parliament for the last decade. I have no property nor any business interests whatsoever in Bangladesh,” she said.
“I have sought to clarify this to the ACC, but they refuse to engage with my lawyers in London and apparently keep sending correspondence to a random address in Dhaka,” she added.
Allegations linked to land plot in Bangladesh
Siddiq stepped down from her role in the UK government after being accused of benefiting from the administration led by former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Her aunt, Hasina, was put on trial in absentia last week over crimes against humanity during her 15-year tenure as prime minister.
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Bangladesh alleged that Siddiq or her mother obtained a 7,200 sq ft plot of land through “abuse of power and influence”. Siddiq has denied the claim, and her legal team has called the accusations “politically motivated” and without basis.
Prothom Alo reported that Siddiq said she had not been contacted by authorities about the allegations.
Although she was cleared of any wrongdoing by the adviser on ministerial standards, Laurie Magnus, Siddiq resigned as economic secretary to the Treasury and city minister, saying the issue had become a “distraction” for Keir Starmer’s new government.
Arrest warrant issued in Bangladesh
Siddiq said she believed the accusations were part of a “politically motivated smear campaign” led by Hasina’s opponents.
She has yet to receive a reply from Yunus or his office, according to a source quoted by BD News. The source also said Siddiq did not understand why the ACC was pursuing her.
A warrant for Siddiq’s arrest was issued in Bangladesh last month. She said she was unaware of the warrant or of any court proceedings she was expected to attend.
Under the UK’s 2B extradition category, ministers and judges require clear evidence from Bangladesh before any arrest decision can be made.
Arrest warrants have also been issued for Siddiq’s mother, Rehana, and her siblings, who have all denied the allegations.
(With inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
As part of this plan, £86bn will be directed towards 'turbo-charging our fastest growing sectors, from tech and life sciences, to advanced manufacturing and defence,' the government said in a statement. (Representational image: iStock)
THE UK government has announced plans to invest £86 billion in science, technology, and defence by 2030. The announcement comes days before it outlines its broader spending plan for the coming years.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has already introduced cuts to public budgets in recent months, citing tight fiscal conditions. She has also approved more borrowing for investment, enabling a total of £113bn in investment by the end of the decade.
As part of this plan, £86bn will be directed towards "turbo-charging our fastest growing sectors, from tech and life sciences, to advanced manufacturing and defence," the government said in a statement.
According to The Times newspaper, Reeves is also expected to announce a funding increase of up to £30bn for the National Health Service on Wednesday, when she presents the government's full review of public spending.
The government said the £86bn investment will focus on "people's priorities: health, security and the economy."
The plan includes the development of "innovation clusters" across the country and will give local government leaders new powers to decide how their funding is used, it said.
Reeves aims to use this spending to boost growth, which remains slow and could be affected further by the trade war launched by US president Donald Trump.
Earlier this week, the government said the review would also include a proposal to double investment in public transport in urban areas of England to more than £15 billion by 2030.
The Ministry of Defence is expected to receive a budget increase as part of Wednesday's review. However, other departments will face more spending cuts, in addition to those announced in March.
Expected areas for cuts include support for disabled people and general government operating costs.
On Saturday, thousands of people gathered in central London to protest against the anticipated spending reductions. Many carried placards that read, "tax the rich, stop the cuts -- welfare not warfare."