Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

 Lessons Learned: Shameful injustice had deep roots

By Marvin Rees

Mayor of Bristol


LIKE everyone in the UK, I watched the Win­drush scandal unfold with dismay and horror.

But as the UK’s only elected mayor of Carib­bean descent, sadly I did not watch it with huge surprise. For as the Lessons Learned re­view published last week makes clear, this shameful injustice has deep roots.

The Windrush scan­dal is a product of rac­ism. Absolutely. But to focus only on that would miss the fact that this scandal was also funda­mentally a product of centralisation, and the deadly effect of policy being made by people who are distant from, unrepresentative of, and frankly uninterested in the people they are sup­posed to be serving.

One of the most shocking elements of Wendy Williams’ report is the extent to which former ministers and senior civil servants are still unable or unwilling to take responsibility for the devastating conse­quences of their ac­tions. This lack of re­pentance is symptomat­ic of the profound dis­tance between those setting the rules in the Home Office and the people in communities affected by them.

As a city leader, if I spent more than £3 mil­lion on setting up and running a compensa­tion scheme that then gave out only £62,000 to 36 people, council tax payers would be ap­palled. And yet that is exactly what the Home Office has done with the Windrush Compen­sation Scheme.

The Lessons Learned review describes “a cul­ture of disbelief and carelessness” in the Home Office. Of course, part of what enables and encourages this culture is the chronic lack of representation among politicians and civil servants. How else can it be explained that an entire section of the population had their history “institutionally forgotten” by one of the largest government de­partments? Local gov­ernment is far from per­fect on this front, but in Bristol we are making huge efforts to ensure that those running the city are representative of those who live here.

As mayor, I bring with me the experience of having grown up as a mixed-race child in a single-parent house­hold. My deputy mayor for communities is a Rastafarian daughter of the Windrush genera­tion, while my advisor on migration is a former journalist and refugee from Zimbabwe.

We may have a home secretary with a migrant background, but the Home Office needs to go much further, much faster in terms of the di­versity of those setting and implementing poli­cy. Only then do we have any chance of moving away from our tired public conversation on ‘British identity’.

But even more im­portant than central government becoming more diverse is the des­perate need for deci­sion-making powers to be more effectively de­volved. What Windrush reveals is the chronic disposition of national politics to prioritise slo­gans and soundbites over practical policies. The “hostile environ­ment” will go down in history as one of the worst examples of polit­ical leaders trying to look and sound tough without any interest in what the adverse conse­quences might be for the individuals who might suffer as a result.

As Williams’ report puts it, “both policy makers and operational staff lost sight of people the department had a duty to protect”. Of course, when it tran­spired that people who were legally resident in the UK were being de­ported and discriminat­ed against, there was rightly a national outcry, but these same “hostile environment” policies continue to make life a misery for countless peo­ple in our communities. And when the deadline passes for EU citizens to register under the Set­tled Status scheme next year, there will be a new set of people who will have been here for years, contributing to our economy and society, and who will suddenly be­come liable to deporta­tion and discrimination.

So as we digest the full implications of the Windrush Lessons Learned review, we need to recognise both the moral failure, and the political culture that makes that failure more likely. Of course, the ur­gent priority must be to make things right for those who have had their lives turned upside down. Then there must be reform of the Home Office and an end to the “hostile environment”.

But more than that, there must also be a se­rious reflection on how we can push power away from distant and indif­ferent Whitehall and down to the regional, city and local levels. Only then will we get the policies that reflect the real needs of people in our communities.

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less