A landlord, accused of racially abusing his tenant and attempting to break into his home in an Irish city over unpaid, rent has been arrested.
He allegedly used an electrical saw to cut through the door of Muhammed Raheel Jethel - his tenant for four years - in Ballinasloe in Galway on April 17.
When Jethel screamed “Are you mad”, the furious landlord lunged at him, saying, 'I'll f***ing split you open.”
The landlord confronted the Pakistan-origin surgical registrar as he had not received rent from the tenant since August last year.
However, Jethel said he attempted to make the payments but the money bounced back. He said he unsuccessfully tried to contact the house owner.
The landlord, who is not named by the police, came to Jethel’s door with a locksmith the previous week when the surgeon was at work. Jethel had to come back home midway from his work as his panic-stricken wife informed him that someone was “drilling outside” and was “breaking into the house”.
The locksmith told Jethel at the time that he was told to change the lock. The landlord who also arrived at the spot shouted at Jethel, “Where is my rent?”
When Jethel explained the difficulties he faced while trying to pay the rent online, the landlord spoke about switching bank accounts and racially abused the surgeon, The Journal reported.
But the landlord returned on Monday (17) with a circular saw to confront Jethel again.
In a video filmed from inside the surgeon’s rented house, the landlord can be heard saying: “I have a Quran in my car to burn. I don’t care about your family.”
He tells Jethel: “I’m going to cut the door down. I have been to the guards. They told me to ask you about the money, (and) if you refuse, they will be coming.”
The landlord can be seen cutting through the door using the saw. He charged at the surgeon when he was told to stay back.
During the confrontation, Jethel said he would call the police.
Gardai confirmed an arrest had been made in connection with the case.
Site Navigation
Search
AI Powered
Human content,
AI powered search.
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
More For You
Calls grow for Starmer to sack Tulip Siddiq amid graft allegations
Jan 13, 2025
PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer is under increasing pressure to remove Treasury minister Tulip Siddiq following allegations linked to her family’s ties with Bangladesh's former prime minister.
Siddiq has faced scrutiny over her connection to her aunt, Sheikh Hasina, who fled Bangladesh in August after being ousted by a student-led uprising that ended her long tenure as prime minister.
Earlier this month, Siddiq referred herself to Starmer's standards adviser after allegations surfaced that she lived in properties connected to her aunt and the Awami League party, which Hasina previously led. Siddiq has denied any wrongdoing.
When asked on Monday about Siddiq’s position in the government, senior minister Pat McFadden told Sky News she had "done the right thing" by referring herself for investigation. He stated that the standards adviser has the authority to investigate such allegations.
"That is what he is doing, and that is the right way to deal with this," McFadden said.
However, opposition leaders are calling for Siddiq’s dismissal.
"I think it's untenable for her to carry out her role," said Conservative finance spokesman Mel Stride on Times Radio. "It's inappropriate for Tulip to be in the position that she holds at the moment. She is the anti-corruption minister in government."
Corruption investigation in Bangladesh
In December, Siddiq was named in a Bangladesh anti-corruption commission probe into the alleged embezzlement of £4.13 billion by Hasina’s family related to a Russian-funded nuclear power project.
Bangladeshi money laundering investigators have since directed major banks to provide transaction records related to Siddiq.
As Treasury minister, Siddiq oversees the UK’s financial services sector and anti-corruption policies.
Over the weekend, a Sunday Times report claimed Siddiq lived for years in a London flat owned by an offshore company linked to two Bangladeshi businessmen. The property was later gifted to a Bangladeshi barrister connected to Hasina, her family, and her former government.
The report also stated that Siddiq and her family used several other London properties purchased by members or associates of the Awami League party.
Bangladesh’s interim leader, Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, has called for a thorough investigation into these claims.
He told the newspaper that the properties might be tied to broader corruption allegations against Hasina’s government, which he described as the "plain robbery" of billions from Bangladesh’s treasury.
(With inputs from AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
News
'UK not able to reap benefits of multiculturalism because of prejudiced thinking'
Sarwar Alam
08 June 2023
Spirituality
Unlocking ancient healing: The power and precision of Vedic mantras
Ashwini Guruji
10 January
Bangladesh's Yunus calls for probe into Tulip Siddiq's assets
Jan 13, 2025
BANGLADESH government's chief adviser Muhammad Yunus has urged an investigation into the properties owned by Tulip Siddiq and her family, suggesting they may have been acquired unlawfully during the tenure of her aunt, Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina.
In an interview with The Times, Yunus criticised the alleged use of properties gifted to the Treasury and City minister and her family by "allies of her aunt's deposed regime."
He called for the assets to be returned to Bangladesh if they were found to have been acquired through misappropriated funds. "It's about plain robbery," Yunus stated, accusing the previous government of embezzling funds that had significant consequences for the country.
The Sunday Times followed Yunus’ interview with another report titled “(UK) PM urged to sack Tulip Siddiq after Bangladesh leader's rebuke.” The report mentioned calls for Siddiq’s resignation over allegations tied to properties gifted to her and her family during Sheikh Hasina's regime.
It also noted that Downing Street might already be considering Siddiq's replacement.
According to the investigation, Siddiq lived in a Hampstead property linked to an offshore company named in the Panama Papers, which is reportedly connected to two Bangladeshi businessmen. Yunus called it "ironic" that Siddiq, responsible for tackling corruption, faced such allegations.
Yunus referred to findings in an official report, which alleged that individuals connected to the Awami League regime had funnelled billions of dollars out of Bangladesh, using some of it to acquire foreign properties. "They pointed out how money is stolen, but it's not stealing – when you steal, you hide it. It's a robbery," Yunus said.
When asked if these allegations could apply to properties used by Hasina's family in London, Yunus replied, "Absolutely, it's about plain robbery. Nothing else." He added, “If a UK parliament member is involved, definitely it’s a big issue.”
Yunus emphasised the need for these properties to be returned to Bangladesh, where possible.
He mentioned that efforts were underway to recover cash and assets held overseas, believed to have originated from funds taken out of Bangladesh.
The Sunday Times noted that the UK’s National Crime Agency had expressed willingness to assist Bangladesh in recovering such assets.
(With inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Cambridge shaped Manmohan Singh’s economic vision
Jan 13, 2025
DR MANMOHAN SINGH’S passing at the age of 92 on December 26 reminds me of my interview with the then prime minister of India in 2006 in Delhi. He told me his economic thinking had been shaped to a great extent by his time in Cambridge.
The man credited with opening up India to globalisation, serving as minister of finance from 1991 to 1996 under prime minister PV Narasimha Rao, said he viewed economics as a tool to help the poorest in society.
After studying at Punjab University, Singh attended Cambridge, earning a First in economics as an undergraduate at St John’s College from 1955 to 1957. He later returned to the UK to complete his PhD at Nuffield College, Oxford, from 1960 to 1962. Dr Singh, who served as prime minister from 2004 to 2014, received honorary degrees from both universities – Oxford in 2005 (“because it asked him first”) and Cambridge in 2006.
He (wrongly) assumed I would be familiar with The Economics of Welfare, an influential 1920 book by Arthur Cecil Pigou, who served as professor of political economy at Cambridge from 1908 to 1943.
“Well, I studied economics at Cambridge,” Dr Singh began. “It was the very famous Cambridge economist, AC Pigou, who said that when we study economics our impulse is not the philosopher’s impulse – ‘knowledge for the sake of knowledge’ – but for the healing that knowledge will help to bring. I have an opportunity to use my knowledge to soften the harsh edges of extreme poverty in India. That is a privilege for me.”
A few weeks later, I attended the ceremony when Cambridge conferred an honorary degree on him. Cambridge stressed in an official statement: “He is the most highly educated Indian prime minister in history.”
Manmohan Singh; the then prime minister of India walks in procession through Cambridge University in October 2006 before receiving an honorary Doctor of Law degree
The prime minister addressed the senate gathering: “The colour light blue is one of my favourites and is often seen on my head. My memories of my days in Cambridge are deep. I was taught by teachers like Nicholas Kaldor, Joan Robinson, Maurice Dobb and Professor RCO Mathews. I have vivid recollections of the economist Pierro Sraffa working at the Marshall Library. In many important ways, the University of Cambridge made me.”
On a personal note, Dr Singh’s death has stirred memories for Cipla chairman Yusuf Hamied, who studied chemistry at Christ’s College, Cambridge, from 1954 to 1957, earning a First, and stayed on to complete his PhD in 1960.
One of Hamied’s contemporaries at Christ’s was Swaranjit Singh, a cricketing Blue (as he had played against Oxford). Since he was a very shy man, Hamied took the initiative in introducing him to a German girl, Irmengard, at a local dance. Six months later, the couple were married at a registry office in Chesterton Road.
“It was a quiet wedding on September 28, 1956,” recalled Hamied. “I was one of the witnesses. Manmohan was the other. Because of my friendship with Swaranjit, I met Manmohan. The two sardars were friends – there were not too many turbanned sardars in Cambridge at the time.
“I did not meet Manmohan again until March 2005, when I was awarded the Padma Bhushan by President Abdul Kalam. Manmohan, who was then prime minister, said, ‘Ah, yes, I remember,’ when I reminded him that he had been a witness at Swaranjit’s wedding. His Cambridge connection truly carries a lot of history.”
With US president Barack Obama, first lady Michelle Obama, and his wife Gursharan Kaur at the White House in November 2009
When Swaranjit died in 2019, his son, Ranjit, now 56, received a letter of condolence from Dr Singh on behalf of himself and his wife Gursharan: “Swaranjit was a great friend of ours and in his death you have lost a wonderful father and we have lost a very dear friend.”
My interview with Dr Singh very nearly did not happen. “We’ll try next time,” the prime minister’s media adviser, Sanjaya Baru, would say each time I submitted a request on behalf of the Daily Telegraph in London. Subsequent events indicated Baru did not want anything that might reflect well on the prime minister. But I had an ally in Kamal Nath, who came frequently to London as he was the cabinet minister handling commerce and industry.
“Not to worry,” he said. “The prime minister is addressing a conference at the Taj Hotel. As he leaves, I will take him down a corridor where I will arrange for you to meet him ‘by chance’. Have your questions ready.”
It wasn’t easy to get through several levels of security, especially with my tape recorder, but the prime minister appeared aware of the game being played and gave me about half an hour. Baru was not pleased when he found out: “You’ve been very cunning.”
Dr Singh felt betrayed in 2014 when Baru published The Accidental Prime Minister: The Making and Unmaking of Manmohan Singh, a less than flattering portrait of his former boss.
The book alleged that Dr Singh was not entirely in control of his cabinet – or even the Congress party’s president Sonia Gandhi, to whom the prime minister was apparently completely “subservient”.
“There cannot be two centres of power,” Baru claimed Dr Singh told him. “That creates confusion. I have to accept that the party president is the centre of power. The government is answerable to the party.”
Dr Singh issued a statement on the day The Accidental Prime Minister was released, rejecting the memoir’s credibility: “It is an attempt to misuse a privileged position and access to high office to gain credibility and to apparently exploit it for commercial gain. The commentary smacks of fiction and coloured views of a former adviser.”
In my interview, I had asked Dr Singh whether he had picked up any tips as an economics student at Cambridge. After all, as leader of the multiparty government, the United Progressive Alliance, he has to reconcile the conflicting demands of India’s corporate sector, which wanted him to quicken the pace of economic reform, and the Left, which was worried about the consequences of free market policies on the most vulnerable sections of society.
At Cambridge, the young Singh had been influenced by Joan Robinson, who “propounded the leftwing interpretation of Keynes” and “was a great admirer of what was going on in China”, while Nicholas Kaldor was “pragmatic, scintillating, stimulating” and “used the Keynesian analysis to demonstrate that capitalism could be made to work”.
Singh, who was close to both teachers, admitted he was “exposed to two alternative schools of thought” and that “the clash of thinking sometimes got me into difficulties”.
With Pakistan prime minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani at the 2011 ICC World Cup semifinal in Mohali, north India
In October 2006, I heard him address the senate when Cambridge gave him an honorary Doctor of Law.
He made it clear he had friends from all parts of the subcontinent: “It was here that I became a contemporary of Amartya Sen, Jagadish Bhagwati, Mahbubul Haq and Rehman Shobhan – all renowned economists from south Asia who became lifelong friends. My teachers and my peers in Cambridge taught me to be open to argument and to be fearless and lucid in the expression of one’s opinions.
“These virtues, and a relentless desire to pursue intellectual truth were inculcated in me at Cambridge. In many important ways, the University of Cambridge made me.”
He said: “I am certainly not the only Indian who is thus indebted to this university. Jawaharlal Nehru was at Trinity as was his grandson, Rajiv Gandhi. Both became prime ministers of India. I am thus the third prime minister of India to have come out of Cambridge.”
Singh set out his quest to lift people out of poverty: “When I came up to Cambridge in the mid1950s, the cold war had frozen the world into two blocs.
“Today the world appears radically altered. The cold war is history. A new age of freedom has harnessed new technologies that have transformed production and communication. The dismantling of state control has unshackled economic forces. More countries are now integrated into a global economic system in which trade and capital flow across borders with unprecedented energy. The age of freedom is also the age of economic growth. Prometheus has truly been unbound.
“In many parts of the developing world, especially India and China, per capita incomes are doubling or are expected to double over every decade. This will lift millions of people out of poverty.
“In my own country, the economic reforms we initiated in the early 1990s have made our economy more competitive. Indian business is responding to new market opportunities.
“India’s growth is underpinned by a vibrant and growing entrepreneurial class. Indian youth is keen to get into technical and scientific institutions – helping India gain salience as a knowledge-based economy. Our country, I believe, is now on growth path of seven to nine per cent per year, while maintaining price stability. The proportion of people living below the poverty line is declining.”
But he also warned: “The gap between the rich and the poor is widening. This, coupled with the inability of the public sector to provide adequate and quality services in health and education, and cater to the needs of the poor, is causing resentment and alienation. This is nurturing divisive forces and putting pressure on the practice of democracy.”
Meeting Queen Elizabeth II during a reception for G20 leaders at Buckingham Palace in April 2009
His words might explain today’s migration crisis, the rise of the far right across Europe or possible trade wars with Trump’s America.
“As Jawaharlal Nehru said in his address to the Canadian parliament in 1949: ‘There can be no security or real peace if vast numbers of people in various parts of the world live in poverty and misery. Nor can there be a balanced economy for the world as a whole if the underdeveloped parts continue to upset that balance and drag down even the more prosperous nations.’
“The best efforts to eradicate poverty will be in vain and can be defeated if our societies and nations are threatened by the spectre of terrorism and extremism. Open societies like India and Britain are more vulnerable to this threat. The very openness of our societies makes us more vulnerable. Yet we must fight terrorism without losing the openness or the rule of law that guarantees the freedom of the individual.
“You may well wonder why I have expressed these thoughts at this forum. Before the First World War, a young man from Allahabad came up to Trinity via Harrow. After the Second War, a simple young Indian came to St John’s from an obscure university in Punjab. Cambridge University embraced both. This inclusive character of my alma mater emboldened me to speak to this august gathering about inclusive globalisation.”
In my interview, Dr Singh had talked of UK-India relations: “I hope I will be able to induce British business to take a more vigorous, more dynamic, more aggressive interest in investing in India.
“India’s need for investments is enormous. We are growing at the rate of about eight per cent per annum. Our ambition is to ensure that our economy grows at the rate of about 10 per cent per annum and that means that we will need to invest about 32-34 per cent of our GDP. We are currently investing about 30 per cent.
“Our effort is to ensure that India has a world class infrastructure,” he said. “That includes ports, airports, roads, the transport services, that includes a lot more investment in the power sector and other related energy systems. These are our highest priorities. We also want our financial services system to be liberalised and expand. All these are areas in which I believe that the United Kingdom has distinct capabilities which can be harnessed to our mutual advantage.”
Dr Singh was widely seen as a wise man. After the 2008 Mumbai massacre, he resisted pressure to take military action against Pakistan.
In 2023, this prompted the New York Times writer Thomas L Friedman to tell Israel to learn from Dr Singh’s example: “I am watching the Israel-Hamas war and thinking about one of the world leaders I’ve most admired: Manmohan Singh. He was India’s prime minister in late November 2008 when 10 Pakistani jihadist militants from the Lashkar-e-Taiba group, widely believed to be linked to Pakistan’s military intelligence, infiltrated India and killed more than 160 people in Mumbai, including 61 at two luxury hotels. What was Singh’s military response to India’s Sept. 11?”
Friedman answers his own question: “He did nothing.”
He continued: “Singh never retaliated militarily against the nation of Pakistan or Lashkar camps in Pakistan. It was a remarkable act of restraint. What was the logic? In his book Choices: Inside the Making of India’s Foreign Policy, India’s foreign secretary (the most senior civil servant in India’s external affairs ministry) at the time, Shivshankar Menon, explained, making these key points:
“‘I myself pressed at that time for immediate visible retaliation’ against the jihadist bases or against Pakistani military intelligence, ‘which was clearly complicit,’ Menon wrote. ‘To have done so would have been emotionally satisfying and gone some way toward erasing the shame of the incompetence that India’s police and security agencies displayed.’
“He continued, ‘But on sober reflection and in hindsight, I now believe that the decision not to retaliate militarily and to concentrate on diplomatic, covert and other means was the right one for that time and place.’”
Keep ReadingShow less
India opens Maha Kumbh Mela, expected to draw 400 million pilgrims
Jan 13, 2025
THE MAHA KUMBH MELA, one of the largest religious gatherings in the world, began on Monday in Prayagraj in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, with millions of Hindu devotees taking a ritual dip at the confluence of the Ganges, Yamuna, and the mythical Saraswati rivers.
Organisers expect around 400 million people to attend the six-week festival, which will continue until 26 February.
Pilgrims began arriving in the early hours to bathe in the sacred waters, a ritual believed to cleanse sins and bring salvation. "I feel great joy. For me, it's like bathing in nectar," said 45-year-old Surmila Devi. Reena Rai, a businesswoman from Madhya Pradesh who travelled nearly 1,000 kilometres, said, "As a Hindu, this is an unmissable occasion."
The Kumbh Mela is deeply rooted in Hindu mythology, symbolising the celestial battle between gods and demons over a pitcher of the nectar of immortality. The festival rotates among four cities—Prayagraj, Haridwar, Ujjain, and Nashik—every three years. The Maha Kumbh Mela, held once every 12 years in Prayagraj, is considered the most auspicious.
The scale of the event is immense, comparable to the combined populations of the United States and Canada. (Photo: Getty Images)
On Monday, over 2.5 million pilgrims were expected to bathe, followed by the "royal bath" on Tuesday, reserved for ascetics.
Saffron-clad monks, ash-smeared ascetics, and devotees chanting "Har Har Mahadev" and "Jai Ganga Maiyya" filled the riverbanks.
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi described the event as a "divine occasion" bringing together "countless people in a sacred confluence of faith, devotion and culture."
Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath invited people to "experience unity in diversity" at the "world's largest spiritual and cultural gathering."
Massive security and infrastructure for the festival
The scale of the event is immense, comparable to the combined populations of the United States and Canada.
Festival spokesperson Vivek Chaturvedi said, "Some 350 to 400 million devotees are going to visit the mela, so you can imagine the scale of preparations."
Security measures include 40,000 police officers on duty and AI-equipped surveillance cameras for continuous monitoring.
Authorities have set up multiple "lost and found" centres and a mobile app to help reunite lost pilgrims with their families.
A temporary city covering over 4,000 hectares has been constructed along the riverbanks. It includes 150,000 tents, 145,000 restrooms, and 3,000 community kitchens, each capable of feeding up to 50,000 people simultaneously.
Additionally, 68,000 LED light poles have been installed, making the site visible from space.
A Hindu devotee smeared with ash dances during a religious procession ahead of the Maha Kumbh Mela in Prayagraj on January 10. (Photo: Getty Images)
Indian Railways has added 98 trains making 3,300 trips to manage the influx of visitors. About 450,000 new electricity connections have been set up, and the festival is expected to consume more power than 100,000 urban apartments do in a month.
Pilgrims endure long journeys and cold weather
Pilgrims travelled from across India to take part. Jaishree Ben Shahtilal from Gujarat took three days to arrive with her neighbours in a convoy of 11 buses. "I have great faith in God. I have waited for so long to bathe in the holy river," she said.
Temperatures dropped to around 15 degrees Celsius overnight, but devotees remained undeterred. "Once you are in the water, you don't even feel cold," said 56-year-old Chandrakant Nagve Patel. "I felt like I was one with God."
Many first-time visitors expressed mixed feelings of excitement and apprehension. Priyanka Rajput, a fashion model from Delhi, said, "I am excited but now scared because I didn't expect this crowd. This is my first Kumbh, and I came only because my mother is very spiritual."
Pilgrims carrying their belongings walk over floating pontoon bridges to go to Sangam, the confluence of the Ganges, Yamuna and mythical Saraswati rivers, in Prayagraj on January 12. (Photo: Getty Images)
A blend of devotion and government showcase
The festival also serves as an opportunity for the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to showcase its focus on religious and cultural heritage.
"The Maha Kumbh embodies India’s timeless spiritual heritage and celebrates faith and harmony," Modi stated on social media.
The previous "ardh" or half Kumbh Mela in 2019 attracted 240 million pilgrims. In comparison, the annual Hajj pilgrimage in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, draws about 1.8 million participants.
As the Kumbh Mela progresses, authorities continue to manage crowd safety while maintaining the sanctity of the event.
"It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity," said Savita Venkat, a teacher from Bengaluru. Government employee Bhawani Baneree from Maharashtra added, "The vibrant atmosphere made my long journey worthwhile."
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Asian brother-sister duo jailed for charity fraud
Jan 12, 2025
A Birmingham-based brother and sister duo associated with the Sikh Youth UK group have been sentenced by a UK court after being found guilty of fraud offences relating to charitable donations.
Rajbinder Kaur, 55, was convicted for money laundering and six counts of theft amounting to £50,000 and one count under Section 60 of the UK’s Charities Act 2011, which covers knowingly or recklessly providing false or misleading information to the Charity Commission.
Her brother Kaldip Singh Lehal, 43, was also convicted for the same charge under the Charities Act. Kaur and Lehal ran the Sikh Youth UK (SYUK) group.
While Kaur was sentenced to two years and eight months imprisonment by Birmingham Crown Court on Thursday (9), Lehal was given a four months’ sentence suspended for 18 months and 80 hours of community service.
“Kaur tried to portray herself as someone naive about financial matters despite having worked in a bank,” Superintendent Annie Miller from West Midlands Police said in a statement following the sentencing this week.
“SYUK was clearly a means to fund her lifestyle and pay her debts off, but in the simplest of terms Kaur was stealing large amounts of money that had been donated by local people for good causes,” she said.
The pair were initially arrested in July 2019 and subsequently charged in September 2019.
“This has been a very long and complex investigation into fraud, and we have worked closely with the Charity Commission to bring this pair to justice,” Miller added.
The duo were convicted in September 2024 following a trial at Birmingham Crown Court during which it emerged that Kaur and Lehal had made an application in 2016 to the sector’s independent regulator Charity Commission for it to become a registered charity.
But when the Commission asked for further information about SYUK, the information was not given, so the charity application was closed.
The court heard that SYUK received countless donations during fundraising events including a sponsored winter sleep-out and a football tournament, both in 2018.
Kaur, a former bank worker, would transfer funds from the SYUK bank to her own account and then pay off her personal debts and loans as well as sending money to others, including family members.
Kaur had over 50 personal bank accounts in an attempt to make it as complicated as possible to follow the flow of stolen money, West Midlands Police said.
The case dates back to October 2018, when West Midlands Police notified the Charity Commission of concerns relating to SYUK’s receipt and use of charitable funds. While Sikh Youth UK is not a registered charity, the commission claims jurisdiction due to the funds being charitable.
The watchdog said it exercised its powers under Section 52 of the Charities Act 2011 to obtain copies of bank statements. The Commission’s analysis of the information identified a number of regulatory concerns which warranted further investigation. The Commission therefore opened a statutory inquiry on November 15, 2018, and publicly announced its investigation only in July 2019 to avoid prejudicing any criminal proceedings.
SYUK activists gathered outside Birmingham Crown Court this week to protest what they branded as a “witch-hunt” against the group.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
© Copyright 2025 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Garavi Gujarat Publications