A survey last week among Muslim voters showed that only 43 per cent of those who voted for Labour in the 2019 general election declared they will vote for the party again
By BARNIE CHOUDHURY and SARWAR ALAM Feb 14, 2024
LABOUR is “haemorrhaging” the Muslim vote, which will have a negative impact when Britain holds the general election, expected later this year, party MPs have told Eastern Eye.
Late on Monday (12), Labour withdrew its support and suspended for its candidate for Rochdale, Azhar Ali, following criticism of remarks he made about Israel.
Ali will still appear on the ballot as the party's candidate and should he win, he will be an independent MP.
It is a major blow for Labour as Rochdale was considered to be a safe seat.
A survey last week among Muslim voters showed that only 43 per cent of those who voted for Labour in the 2019 general election declared they will vote for the party again.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s handling of the ongoing Israel-Gaza war was cited as a key reason in leaving Muslim voters feeling “disillusioned”.
“They've haemorrhaged the Muslim vote and they've not done anything to try and go back and amend the damage they've done,” one Labour MP told Eastern Eye.
“The moral high ground right now on Gaza, belongs to the Tories (foreign secretary David Cameron earlier this month called for a ceasefire in the region and later said the UK is considering a push to recognise a Palestinian state),” the Labour MP added.
“We've been outflanked by the Tories time and time again. Muslim voters feel like they no longer have a political home, that’s how disillusioned they feel.
“The narrative in the community now is, ‘we'd rather not have a political home, than be taken for granted by the Labour party’.”
Sir Keir Starmer (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Trust issues
Last Friday (9) the shadow justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood MP, said there had been “a loss of trust” from British Muslims in the party over Israel-Gaza issue and urged Labour to “rebuild” relations with Muslim voters.
Data from a research company, Survation, and the Labour Muslim Network (LMN) found that 86 per cent of British Muslims voted Labour in the 2019 general election.
Asked how they would vote now, only 43 per cent said they will definitely vote Labour again, while 23 per cent were undecided.
“I believe Labour is going to lose a lot of Muslim voters. The party have previously taken Muslim voters for granted,” a Labour parliamentarian told Eastern Eye.
“There was an assumption that Muslims just voted Labour.
“That was a comfortable assumption because that's how it appeared in lots of Muslim communities.
“However, a series of decisions have been made that have affected how the Muslim community feel about Labour.
“They feel an incongruency with their values and some of what the Labour Party appears to have supported and stood for.”
Shabana Mahmood (Picture by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
“Complete disaster”
A Westminster insider described the situation as a “complete disaster”.
“It's actually worse than it was during Iraq.
“In the middle of the Iraq crisis, there was a by-election, which Labour lost really, really badly.
“The key day, of course is February 29, when we find out the by-election result for Rochdale.”
On Monday, Sir Keir called for a “sustainable ceasefire” in relation to the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying it would be “catastrophic” if Israel attacked Rafah where 1.4 million displaced Palestinians are based.
However, his initial stance on the war in October, when he refused to call for a ceasefire and suggested Israel had the "right" to cut off water and energy to Gaza, led to the resignations by a number of frontbench Labour MPs and councillors.
“If you look at some of the things that have happened, that have been particularly unfortunate, such as (Starmer’s) comments on LBC about Israel having the rights to cut off water and electricity to Gaza and then no clarification issued for nine days,” the Labour parliamentarian said.
“Even then, it was a bit of gaslighting, really, as to the fact that's not quite what he meant to say.
“But, really and truly, the Muslim community and the wider community have been let down.”
Azhar Ali (Picture by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
“Disingenuous” Starmer
The parliamentarian also revealed there have been briefings within Labour that have insinuated this is a Muslim against Jews issue.
“It’s been suggested that Muslims cared about Gaza was because they were anti-Semitic - that assumption is really dangerous,” said the parliamentarian.
“There were some briefings where they said the Muslim voters are really unhappy with us (Labour) because of our tough stance on anti-Semitism, which is horrendous to say, because that basically says Muslims hate Jews.
“When in fact, the whole premise of being a Muslim is the fact that you care about human rights, regardless of who's affected.”
The Labour MP said Sir Keir’s change of stance on Gaza was “disingenuous” and a ploy to garner the Muslim vote.
“If you look at the scripted comments that came out from Starmer on Twitter (now X), a couple of hours later David Lammy spouts exactly the same lines. It's condescending.
“People aren’t stupid, it’s just not Muslim voters, any voter.
“If you look at the two tweets that were sent out (calling for a ceasefire), it was appalling - it was like they're controlling the narrative.
“There's no politics in it anymore, it's just a narrative to get into power.
“Muslims know Labour isn't ahead because it's brilliant, Labour is ahead because the Tories are so crap.
“Starmer is as toxic on the doorsteps as Jeremy Corbyn was pre-2019.”
Independent challenges
The Westminster insider revealed that Muslim communities were coming together to put up independent candidates in the upcoming general election and described the situation as “catastrophic” for Labour.
“There was a meeting in different mosques in the country on Sunday (11).
“The one in Harrow said independent candidates were going to be put up in 30 constituencies,” said the Westminster insider.
“There is no way Muslims are going to go out and vote positively for Labour.
“The two ways Labour are hurt is if they stay at home, and secondly, and more significantly, while they won’t vote Tory, they will vote positively for an independent candidate.”
No recovery
A new website, themuslimvote.co.uk, was recently launched and asked Muslim voters to back a number of locally approved candidates.
It said it was “focused on seats where the Muslim vote can influence the outcome” and will not back anyone “who voted against or abstained on the ceasefire vote”.
Among its backers are NGOs, community groups and Muslim-run businesses.
Leanne Mohamad
One Labour MP described as “astonishing” the level of funding donated towards independent candidates to run against Labour.
Tasnime Akunjee, the lawyer who represents Londoner Shamima Begum who was stripped of her UK citizenship after she joined Daesh (Islamic State group), has announced he will stand as an independent candidate in the Bethnal Green and Bow seat in east London.
Shadow business minister Rushanara Ali MP represents the seat in the Commons.
Pro-Palestinian activist Leanne Mohamad has been installed to stand against shadow health secretary Wes Streeting in Ilford North, with a major fundraising campaign already underway to back her.
“They say there are 30 constituencies, but actually I think it's more than 30, because 30 is where there is a substantial vote - meaning over 15,000.
“There are other seats where there are 3,000 to 5,000 votes, such as Gerrard's Cross (south Buckinghamshire)… you wouldn't think it, but there are lots of Muslims living there and other places, like the outer suburbs of London such as Essex are the same,” said the Westminster insider.
“There's no way the Labour Party can recover from this.”
A Labour spokesperson told Eastern Eye, “The Labour party is committed to a strong relationship with the Muslim community.
“We have been clear that we need to see a sustainable ceasefire and that aid getting into Gaza must be ramped up.
“Labour is committed to tackling Islamophobia and will continue to robustly stand up for the rights of Muslims in our party and wider society.”
Academic: Discontent with party more likely to be felt in by-election
MARIA SOBOLEWSKA, a professor of political science at the University of Manchester, told Eastern Eye Muslim voters’ discontent with the Labour Party would more likely be felt in by-elections rather than the general election, writes Sarwar Alam.
She said although the Israel-Gaza situation was important to Muslim voters, during a general election, it will be other issues closer to home that will take priority when voters decide who to cast their ballots for.
“Muslim voters are the same as any other voters. Foreign policy for them and the issue of Palestine and Gaza are just one of the issues they care about – but not all of them will put that as number one.
“You still see a lot of voters caring more about the NHS, the economy, the cost of living crisis - all of those things would still trump the considerations of the situation in Gaza,” said Sobolewska.
“By-elections are not run on ‘let’s change the government issues’, so we see what is called expressive voting, where people vote more on their principles and more as a protest vote, expressing frustration with both sides.
“The by-election is just the one seat. This is a very good time to send the message to both parties, declaring ‘you have to change your stance and we're not happy’.
“For Muslim voters, it can be a message to Labour saying, ‘we feel like you've abandoned us’.
“However, when it comes to the general election, people are much more likely to vote in a strategic manner and what's best for the country, overall. And Muslim voters, like any other voters, they live in the same country and I think they are fed up with this government more than what’s happening abroad.”
Maria Sobolewska
Sobolewska cast doubt on the overall impact of the Muslim vote on the next general election. Muslims tend to live in Labour safe seats, and there aren't many that would change hands just on the back of the Muslim vote, she said.
Research from the think-tank British Future found that while Labour risks losing “significant numbers of Muslim voters”, it was unlikely to lose “even a handful of seats” as a result at the upcoming election.
Its findings showed the general election challenge for independent candidates is that almost no Westminster constituencies could be won with an appeal to a single minority group.
“Muslim voters might say, ‘we are leaving the Labour Party because of Keir Starmer’s stance on Gaza’, but they have nowhere to go, because it was pretty much the stance of all the parties,” said Sobolewska.
“I suspect that even though British Muslims, maybe in greater numbers, will say ‘Labour is not my party, I don't feel they represent me’, when push comes to shove at the general election, their choice comes to letting in the Conservative government or voting Labour, they’ll hold their noses and vote Labour.”
A UK court on Thursday denied bail to fugitive Indian diamond businessman Nirav Modi, who sought release while awaiting extradition to India. Modi cited potential threats to his life and said he would not attempt to flee Britain.
Modi, 55, has been in custody in the UK since March 2019. He left India in 2018 before details emerged of his alleged involvement in a large-scale fraud at Punjab National Bank.
He denies any wrongdoing, according to his lawyer. His extradition to India was approved by UK courts, and his appeals, including a request to approach the UK Supreme Court, were rejected in 2022.
On Thursday, Modi’s lawyer Edward Fitzgerald told the High Court that the extradition could not take place for confidential legal reasons. "There are confidential legal reasons why (Modi) cannot be extradited," he said, without providing further details.
Representing Indian authorities, lawyer Nicholas Hearn opposed the bail application, arguing that Modi might try to escape or interfere with witnesses. Hearn referred to Modi’s past attempt to seek citizenship in Vanuatu as an indication he might flee.
Fitzgerald responded that Modi would not leave the UK due to fear of the Indian government. He mentioned alleged recent plots to target Sikh activists in the United States and Canada, which India has denied. He also cited India's alleged involvement in returning Sheikha Latifa, daughter of Dubai’s ruler, to Dubai in 2018.
"The reach of the Indian government for extrajudicial reprisals is practically limitless," Fitzgerald said. "The idea that he could go to Vanuatu ... and there be safe from the Indian government is utterly ridiculous. They would either send a hit squad to get him or they would kidnap him or they would lean on the government to deport him."
The Indian High Commission in London did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Judge Michael Fordham denied the bail plea, saying, "there are substantial grounds for believing that if released by me on bail ... (Modi) would fail to surrender".
Modi is wanted in India in connection with two linked cases — a major fraud at Punjab National Bank and alleged laundering of the proceeds.
His uncle Mehul Choksi, also linked to the case, was arrested in Belgium last month. Choksi has denied any wrongdoing.
Sky TV customers across the UK faced widespread disruption on Thursday night, with issues continuing into Friday morning despite the company saying things were back to normal.
The problems, which began around 9pm, saw more than 30,000 users unable to access TV content. Most complaints were linked to Sky Q boxes crashing or freezing. Some viewers were stuck with error messages saying they couldn’t watch TV due to “connectivity issues” even though their internet seemed fine.
— (@)
By Friday morning, over 2,500 users were still reporting trouble, according to tracking site DownDetector. Most problems (87%) were TV-related, while a smaller number mentioned full blackouts or broadband issues.
DownDetector chart shows view of problems reported in the last 24 hours Downdetector
Sky said the issue stemmed from a technical glitch that pushed some Sky Q boxes into standby mode. “We’re sorry some customers had trouble accessing Sky Q,” the company said. “The issue was quickly resolved, and service has been restored.”
However, many users said otherwise. On social media and DownDetector, complaints kept coming in. Some said rebooting the Sky box worked temporarily, only for it to crash again. Others were irritated by the lack of updates from Sky, especially as the blackout clashed with the Eurovision Song Contest semi-final, a big night for live TV.
“I’ve restarted my box six times already. It just keeps going off again,” one user in Southport wrote. Another from Sheffield posted: “Still down this morning.”
Sky recommends a basic fix: unplug your Sky Q box from the power socket for 30 seconds, then turn it back on. For some, that’s worked. For others, the issue returns after a while.
Downdetector shows the most affected locations and problems Downdetector
Posting on X this morning, the official Sky account shared : "We are aware of some technical issues overnight that led to Sky Q boxes to go into standby mode. Our technical team worked quickly to investigate and restore service.
"If your Sky Q box is still stuck in standby please switch off your Sky Q box at the power socket for 30 seconds and back on again which will restore service. We’re sorry for any inconvenience caused."
Sky’s own help page offers a few steps to try: reboot the box, check Wi-Fi, update the software, and make sure your remote and connections are working. But when none of that helps, users are left in the dark.
DownDetector, a platform that tracks service interruptions, showed how the problem spread and continued, even after Sky’s official fix.
This article was updated following Sky’s public statement issued on Friday morning.
Keep ReadingShow less
Disability campaigners from 'Dignity in Dying' hold placards as they demonstrate outside The Palace of Westminster during a gathering in favour of the proposals to legalise assisted suicide in the UK.
A PROPOSED law that would allow assisted dying for terminally ill people will return to parliament on Friday, with lawmakers set to debate a series of changes before a final vote on whether the bill should proceed.
In November, lawmakers voted 330 to 275 in favour of allowing assisted dying. If passed, the legislation would make Britain one of several countries including Australia, Canada, and some US states to permit assisted dying.
The bill allows mentally competent adults in England and Wales, who have six months or less to live, to end their lives with medical assistance. It has already been revised following detailed scrutiny.
A final vote on the updated bill will take place after Friday’s debate. The large number of proposed amendments means the session may continue next month.
Supporters of the bill point to opinion polls showing most Britons favour assisted dying and say the law should reflect public opinion. However, some lawmakers have raised concerns about protections for vulnerable people. Others argue that palliative care should be improved first.
The Telegraph and Guardian reported that some lawmakers who previously supported the bill are now reconsidering their position.
Prime minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government is neutral on the issue. Lawmakers are free to vote based on their personal views rather than party lines.
A key change from the original version of the bill is the removal of the requirement for court approval. Instead, a panel including a senior legal figure, a psychiatrist and a social worker would decide whether a person is terminally ill and capable of making the decision.
Any further changes to the bill will need to be approved through separate votes. If Friday’s debate runs out of time, the discussion could continue on June 13, before the final vote.
If passed, the bill will move to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.
In 2015, lawmakers rejected similar legislation by 330 votes to 118.
The current bill does not apply to Northern Ireland or Scotland. On Tuesday, the Scottish parliament voted in favour of a similar proposal, which will now move forward for further consideration.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
India's defence minister Rajnath Singh said, 'I believe a big portion of the $1 billion coming from IMF will be used for funding terror infrastructure.'
INDIA's defence minister Rajnath Singh on Friday said the International Monetary Fund (IMF) should reconsider its decision to approve a $1 billion loan to Pakistan, alleging that Islamabad was using the funds to support terrorism.
"I believe a big portion of the $1 billion coming from IMF will be used for funding terror infrastructure," Singh told troops at an air force base in western India. "I believe any economic assistance to Pakistan is nothing less than funding terror."
India and Pakistan had engaged in missile, drone and artillery strikes last week before a ceasefire began on Saturday.
The IMF last week approved a review of its loan programme for Pakistan, unlocking about $1 billion and approving a further $1.4 billion bailout. India objected to the decision but abstained from the review vote.
India, which represents Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh on the IMF board, said in a finance ministry statement that it had "concerns over the efficacy of IMF programmes in case of Pakistan given its poor track record".
Pakistan was on the verge of default in 2023 amid a political crisis and economic downturn. The IMF extended a $7 billion bailout to Pakistan last year, its 24th such assistance since 1958.
Singh said, "It is now clear that in Pakistan terrorism and their government are hand in glove with each other.
"In this situation there is a possibility that their nuclear weapons could get their way into the hands of terrorists. This is a danger not just for Pakistan but the entire world."
The recent fighting between India and Pakistan began on May 7, when India launched strikes on what it called "terrorist camps" in Pakistan. The strikes followed an April attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people.
India blamed Pakistan for supporting the terrorists it said were responsible for the attack. Pakistan has denied the charge.
The four-day exchange of missiles, drones and artillery killed around 70 people on both sides, including dozens of civilians.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Koolesh Shah, Reena Ranger OBE, Ameet Jogia and Sir Oliver Dowden
SIR OLIVER DOWDEN MP and businessman Koolesh Shah have been appointed co-chairs of the Conservative Friends of India (CF India), following the resignation of Ameet Jogia MBE and Reena Ranger OBE, who had led the organisation since 2019.
Jogia and Ranger stepped down after a five-year term that saw CF India grow into the Conservative party’s largest affiliate group, a statement said. The group was founded by Lord Dolar Popat with prime minister David Cameron in 2012.
Appointed by then-prime minister Boris Johnson, their leadership coincided with two general elections, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the appointment of Britain’s first prime minister of Indian origin, Rishi Sunak.
Sir Oliver is a senior Tory MP who has held several ministerial roles, including deputy prime minister and secretary of state for digital, culture, media and sport. Shah, founder of the London Town Group, is active in philanthropy and community work, particularly in education and social mobility. Sir Oliver and Shah said, “It is a privilege to take on this responsibility and build on the outstanding work of Ameet and Reena. CF India plays a vital role in ensuring that the voice of the British Indian community is heard, valued, and represented in the political mainstream, especially during this highly sensitive time. We are committed to deepening that engagement, supporting the next generation of leaders, and continuing to celebrate the values we share – from entrepreneurship to public service, and from community cohesion to our enduring ties with India.”
Under the outgoing co-chairs, CF India said it significantly strengthened the party’s engagement with British Indian communities. According to the statement, the group played a key role in the 2024 general election, contributing to the Tory victory in Leicester East, where the party’s vote share rose from 11 per cent in 2001 to 49 per cent.
Jogia and Ranger also oversaw the development of outreach, training, and fundraising initiatives. They credited CF India’s director, Nayaz Qazi, and grassroots supporters for their contributions to the group’s progress.
In their farewell statement, Jogia and Ranger said, “We leave with immense pride, having brought vibrancy, energy, and renewed purpose to an organisation that has been integral to our political journeys from the start. We will always support CF India and its new leadership.”