Ten years after former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto, the first woman to lead a Muslim nation, was killed in Rawalpindi the unanswered questions about her assassination still fuel conspiracy theories.
Earlier this year two police officers were found guilty of "mishandling the crime scene".
They are the only people ever to be convicted in the December 27, 2007 assassination, the most definitive accounts of which claim an assassin shot Bhutto in the neck and then blew himself up, killing 24 people.
But there is no confirmation of who organised the killing or why. Here are the leading theories about who killed Bhutto:
- The Pakistani state's theory -
Then-president Pervez Musharraf's government blamed the assassination on Pakistani Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud, who denied any involvement. He was killed in a US drone attack in 2009.
Bhutto had been a fierce opponent of Islamic extremists in the country. She was threatened by Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, local jihadist groups and potentially by elements in the Pakistani establishment.
But investigators largely focused on lower-level operatives, paying little attention to the hierarchy in the planning, financing and execution of the assassination.
Musharraf himself is alleged to have been part of a broad conspiracy to have Bhutto, his political rival, killed before elections.
In 2013 a Pakistani court formally charged him with the killing in an unprecedented move against an ex-army chief.
Musharraf fled Pakistan in 2016 and has remained in self-imposed exile ever since. He was declared a fugitive in the case earlier this year.
- The UN's theory -
At the request of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) government that came to power soon after Bhutto's murder, a three-member UN team was dispatched to investigate the killing.
In its 70-page report released in 2010, the UN held Musharraf's administration responsible for failing to provide Bhutto with the necessary security.
"Bhutto's assassination could have been prevented if adequate security measures had been taken," it said.
The team also cited numerous failures by police to properly investigate the murder and preserve the integrity of the crime scene.
Less than two hours after the attack, senior police officer Khurram Shahzad hosed down the the scene. He was one of the two officers convicted this year.
The second officer, then-Rawalpindi police chief Saud Aziz, also refused multiple times to allow an autopsy of Bhutto's body to go ahead.
Police told the UN commission that they collected just 23 pieces of evidence from the scene, "in a case where one would normally have expected thousands", according to the report.
But the UN team hinted at something beyond police incompetence, saying the official investigation was likely stifled by the security establishment.
However it stopped short of naming suspects in the plot to kill Bhutto, saying that responsibility lay with the Pakistani courts.
- The conspiracy theories -
Following Bhutto's death, the PPP came to power and her widower Asif Ali Zardari was elected president. But he failed to make headway unravelling the mysteries behind the murder, drawing fresh allegations of conspiracy.
Speculation was further fuelled after Zardari's senior aide Bilal Sheikh was killed by a suicide bomber in Karachi in 2013.
Sheikh had been in charge of Bhutto's security when she returned to Karachi from exile in October 2007. Bomb attacks targeted her convoy, killing around 140 people.
However, Chilean diplomat Heraldo Munoz, who led the UN investigation, said it was ridiculous to imagine Bhutto's widower had been involved in her death.
Al-Qaeda wanted her dead, he has argued, while the Pakistani Taliban carried out the attack -- possibly with the support of rogue intelligence agents -- and local police arranged a cover-up which he was convinced "came from higher up".
He has further argued that Bhutto's own security failed her and those who encouraged her to return to Pakistan did not provide her with protection.
Other speculation pointed towards Bhutto's trusted bodyguard Khalid Shahensha, with video clips showing him making strange gestures at the podium from which Bhutto addressed the rally moments before her death.
Months after the assassination, Shahensha was mysteriously gunned down in Karachi.
Federline’s book tells some wild stories, such as a knife in the doorway.
He is pushing this “Save Britney” angle now, which is quite a shift.
Britney says she has barely seen the children.
She calls the book a money-making play, hitting right when child support dried up.
Alright, so Kevin Federline has a book coming out. And it is, predictably, causing earthquakes. Britney Spears just threw petrol on the fire with a raw social media post. She is done staying quiet. The ex-husband’s memoir, You Thought You Knew, is packed with claims about her mental state and parenting. And Britney? She is not having it. Not one bit.
Britney Spears shares a blunt statement online in response to Kevin Federline’s new book Getty Images
What is actually in this book?
Federline does not hold back. The excerpts are intense. He says their sons would wake up to find Britney just standing there, watching them sleep, holding a knife. Then she would wander off. He also talks about cocaine use while breastfeeding. His whole point is that ending the conservatorship was a massive error. He says things are spiralling fast. He uses phrases like “the eleventh hour.”
She did not just get angry. She got specific. The “constant gaslighting” is what she calls it. And then she dropped the real bomb about her sons. Think about that. One child, forty-five minutes of face time in five whole years. The other, just four visits. How does that even happen? She says she is “demoralised.” You can feel the defeat in her words. But she is done begging and says from now on, she will let them know when she is available. It is a power move, but a sad one.
Britney surely thinks so. Her statement basically says the “white lies” are heading “straight to the bank.” And she is not wrong about the timing, is she? The child support from her finally ended, and suddenly there is a book full of these private, painful stories. It is pretty convenient. Her team’s statement was even more direct, pointing the finger right at the profit motive.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.