Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

'It's not acceptable, it represents unilateralism of the worst kind': Irish PM Martin slams UK over its North Ireland law

The new legislation has yet to be passed by parliament, a process which could take some time.

'It's not acceptable, it represents unilateralism of the worst kind': Irish PM Martin slams UK over its North Ireland law

Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin said on Sunday a new British law to change part of a Brexit deal to try to ease trade with Northern Ireland was "unilateralism of the worst kind" and urged the government to resume talks.

The European Commission launched two new legal proceedings against Britain this month after London published plans to override some post-Brexit rules in the so-called Northern Ireland protocol which governs trade with the British province. 

London has proposed scrapping some checks on goods from the rest of the United Kingdom arriving in Northern Ireland and challenged the role of the European Court of Justice to decide on parts of the post-Brexit deal agreed by the EU and Britain.

The new legislation has yet to be passed by parliament, a process which could take some time.

"It's not acceptable, it represents unilateralism of the worst kind," Martin told the BBC.

"We accept fully there are legitimate issues around the operation of the protocol and we believe with serious sustained negotiations between the European Union and United Kingdom government, those issues could be resolved."

He said the legislation, which London says is needed to restore a power-sharing administration in Northern Ireland, would damage the province's economy by introducing a dual regulatory regime that could increase costs to business.

"If this bill is enacted, I think we're in a very serious situation," he said. "What now needs to happen is really substantive negotiations between the British government and the European Union."

(Reuters)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tribunal blocks JAC bid to charge me £14,000 for challenging its secrecy
Journalists must be free to challenge powerful institutions : iStock

Tribunal blocks JAC bid to charge me £14,000 for challenging its secrecy

WHO watches the watchdogs? Who judges the judges? And who protects the public when the very institutions meant to uphold justice try to silence those who expose their failings?

Late last Friday (5) evening, a First-tier Tribunal answered those questions with rare clarity. It refused the Judicial Appointments Commission’s (JAC) attempt to saddle me with more than £14,000 in legal costs – a move which would have chilled investigative journalism and sent a message that challenging powerful public bodies comes with a financial noose. That bid for costs came after I had already won, in part, the underlying battle. In March 2025 the same tribunal allowed my appeal and ordered the JAC to disclose information it had previously refused to release.

Keep ReadingShow less