ANDREW STOWE, the auctioneer who sold a pair of “gold-plated circular rimmed spectacles” that had once been worn by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi for a record £260,000, has told Eastern Eye he has now been offered other memorabilia belonging to the Mahatma.
The online auction of the spectacles, which Gandhi had worn in the 1920s when he was practising as a lawyer in South Africa, took place last Friday (21) at East Bristol Auctions in Hanham, Bristol.
Stowe, 32, told Eastern Eye in an exclusive interview: “We’ve already been contacted with lots of other Gandhi-related items. I’m sure this won’t be the last piece of Gandhi memorabilia that we sell. When an auction house gets something that’s high profile like this, it tends to bring other stuff out of the woodwork.”
The successful bidder was a private collector in the United States. With a “buyer’s premium” of 21.6 per cent on the hammer price, he will have to write out a cheque for £316,160.
The vendor is an elderly man from Mangotsfield, once a village north-east of Bristol, who intends sharing his unexpected windfall with his daughter. Not realising the value of the spectacles, he had put them into a plain white envelope which he pushed through the letter box at the auction house one weekend.
When told they could fetch anything between £10,000 and £15,000, the estimate published in the catalogue, he “nearly fell off his chair”.
The vendor had been left the spectacles by an uncle who had worked for British Petroleum in South Africa and been gifted the pair by Gandhi.
Six minutes into the auction came the moment of drama when Stowe brought down his gavel: “If you are interested I will count you down – going once at £260,000, twice at £260,000, your final, final call at £260,000 – round of applause is definitely required at £260,000….sold!”
Later, Stowe revealed: “We had interest from all over the world – bids came from India, Qatar, America, Russia, Canada.”
Stowe agreed it had been “quite a Friday”. News of the impending auction had appeared in thousands of newspapers across the world. “Within 24 hours of that appearing online, it had become an international news story.”
As for the actual auction, “we knew it was going to be popular. But we didn’t think for a single second it was going to explode how it did – that was a real shock.
“All of the bids came in online to start with. They bid up to about £150,000 to £160,000. After that, they stopped bidding. Then it moved over to two telephone bidders, one in America, the one who won it, and then another gentleman based in the UK – and they took it from there.”
Stowe offered a little more information about the buyer: “The gentleman who bought them is very happy with them. He’s got a number of important things in his collection. But I suspect they will just be kept for his own viewing pleasure.”
It seems unlikely the spectacles will end up eventually at a heritage museum in India: “Not in this case. This gentleman’s American, collects historic memorabilia and lives in America.”
As to why the spectacles attracted so much interest, Stowe offered this explanation: “Primarily because they belonged to Gandhi and Gandhi is one of the most important figures in the entire world and entire modern history.
“But I also attribute much of its success to the unusual way in which we received them, which was [they were] just stuck in our letter box one day.
“That story captured the imagination of people all around the world. And you know, people want that story where they have a family heirloom they think is worthless and then it turns out to be worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. While they are Gandhi’s glasses, and I’m sure that is 90 per cent of their appeal, the extra 10 per cent probably did come from the unusual way in which we got to receive them.”
The vendor would initially have been happy to have received £50 for the pair, Stowe said. “He’s on his own, in his 80s. And his daughter actually took the day off work to take her tablet around to his house so they could watch the auction together. Which was rather sweet. It’s nice to have a good news story.”
Stowe added: “The glasses have been in the same family for 100 years and our vendor never actually knew his uncle. He never met him actually – he died before he was born.
“But the family story was that Gandhi had made a visit to British Petroleum where the uncle worked in South Africa. At some point in that meeting, Gandhi gave him his glasses as a thank you.
“There are quite a few historic references to Gandhi giving away things like his glasses, his sandals. It was something he did fairly often. There’s probably around about 20 or 30 different pairs of glasses that he actually gave away over the course of his life.”
The auction has given East Bristol Auctions an international profile: “In the UK, we are one of the top 10 auction houses. But this puts us on an international platform,” Stowe admitted.
“It is one of those items that will be remembered forever. And not just by us, but by people all around the world. It’s been a wonderful thing for us and for our company. I keep saying this is probably one of the most important auction discoveries of the year.”
Stowe conducted a thorough research into the provenance of the spectacles before including them in the auction of “military & history” memorabilia.
After training as a lawyer in London, Gandhi moved to South Africa in 1893 to represent an Indian merchant in a lawsuit. He went on to stay in the country for 21 years. It was in South Africa that Gandhi first employed nonviolent resistance in a campaign for civil rights.
Stowe continued: “We looked at the story to verify it was possible. The vendor’s uncle was in South Africa at the right time, as was Gandhi. We then looked at the specifics of the glasses, which matched other known examples in museums.
“We discovered one pair in a museum which has the bridge section distinctly distorted to fit Gandhi’s nose, and ours carries the identical distortion – that can only be something specific to Gandhi.
“Unfortunately, through 100 years and three generations, the story hasn’t been preserved as neatly as we’d like, but the broad strokes are there, and all the pieces of the jigsaw slotted together perfectly.”
Stowe said: “All the evidence does point to them being genuine. We had about 20 different people bidding. All looked at the same evidence and came to the same conclusion.
“When you think of Gandhi, you think of the glasses, you think of the loincloth, you think of the sandals. It’s just one of the iconic pieces of his make-up.
“It’s like Jimi Hendrix’s guitar, it’s like Winston Churchill’s cigar. They’re just iconic everyday items.”
Chief prosecutor of Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) Mohammad Tajul Islam (C) speaks during a press conference outside the ICT court in Dhaka on June 1, 2025, after the start of the trial against Sheikh Hasina. (Photo by MUNIR UZ ZAMAN/AFP via Getty Images)
FUGITIVE former prime minister Sheikh Hasina orchestrated a "systemic attack" to try to crush the uprising against her government, Bangladeshi prosecutors said at the opening of her trial on Sunday (1).
Hasina, 77, fled by helicopter to India as the student-led uprising ended her 15-year rule, and she has defied an extradition order to return to Dhaka.
The domestic International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) is prosecuting former senior figures connected to Hasina's ousted government and her now-banned party, the Awami League.
"Upon scrutinising the evidence, we reached the conclusion that it was a coordinated, widespread and systematic attack," Mohammad Tajul Islam, ICT chief prosecutor, told the court in his opening speech.
"The accused unleashed all law enforcement agencies and her armed party members to crush the uprising."
Islam lodged charges against Hasina and two other officials of "abetment, incitement, complicity, facilitation, conspiracy, and failure to prevent mass murder during the July uprising".
Hasina, who remains in self-imposed exile in India, has rejected the charges as politically motivated.
As well as Hasina, the case includes ex-police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun -- who is in custody, but who did not appear in court on Sunday -- and former interior minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, who like Hasina, is on the run.
The prosecution of senior figures from Hasina's government is a key demand of several of the political parties now jostling for power. The interim government has vowed to hold elections before June 2026.
The hearing is being broadcast live on state-owned Bangladesh Television.
Prosecutor Islam vowed the trial would be impartial.
"This is not an act of vendetta, but a commitment to the principle that, in a democratic country, there is no room for crimes against humanity," he said.
Investigators have collected video footage, audio clips, Hasina's phone conversations, records of helicopter and drone movements, as well as statements from victims of the crackdown as part of their probe.
The ICT court opened its first trial connected to the previous government on May 25.
In that case, eight police officials face charges of crimes against humanity over the killing of six protesters on August 5, the day Hasina fled the country.
Four of the officers are in custody and four are being tried in absentia.
The ICT was set up by Hasina in 2009 to investigate crimes committed by the Pakistani army during Bangladesh's war for independence in 1971.
It sentenced numerous prominent political opponents to death and became widely seen as a means for Hasina to eliminate rivals.
Earlier on Sunday, the Supreme Court restored the registration of the largest Islamist party, Jamaat-e-Islami, allowing it to take part in elections.
Hasina banned Jamaat-e-Islami during her tenure and cracked down on its leaders.
In May, Bangladesh's interim government banned the Awami League, pending the outcome of her trial, and of other party leaders.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
A BAN on disposable vapes goes into effect across the UK on Sunday (1) in a bid to protect children's health and tackle a "throwaway" culture.
"For too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine," junior environment minister Mary Creagh said.
She said the government was calling "time on these nasty devices" -- a type of e-cigarette which are very popular with young people -- and banning sales of single-use vapes or their supply in a crackdown on UK corner shops and supermarkets.
Those caught flouting the ban will face a £200 fine, while repeat offenders risk up to two years in prison.
Young people and children in particular have been attracted to cheap and colourful disposable vapes, which have snazzy flavours such as mint, chocolate, mango or watermelon, since they were introduced in the UK in 2021.
In 2024, nearly five million disposable vapes were thrown away each week, according to Material Focus, an independent UK-based non-profit.
More than 40 tonnes of lithium, a key metal used in the technology industry, was discarded each year along with single-use vapes -- enough to power 5,000 electrical vehicles, the NGO said.
Fire services have also warned about the risk of discarded vapes catching light among household rubbish.
"Every vape has potential to start a fire if incorrectly disposed of," said Justin Greenaway, commercial manager at electronic waste processing company SWEEEP Kuusakoski.
The new law, first proposed by the previous Tory government, also aims to stem a rise in vaping.
"This new law is a step towards reducing vaping among children, while ensuring products are available to support people to quit smoking," said Caroline Cerny, deputy chief executive for health charity Action on Smoking and Health (ASH).
A recent ASH survey said 11 per cent of adults vape, or about 5.6 million people, and 18 per cent of 11 to 17 year olds -- about 980,000 under-18s. Among vapers, some 52 per cent of young adults aged between 18 to 24 preferred single-use vapes.
The long-term health risks of vaping remain unclear.
E-cigarettes do not produce tar or carbon monoxide, two of the most harmful elements in tobacco smoke. But they do still contain highly addictive nicotine.
The upcoming ban has already led to a fall in disposable vapes. According to ASH, the use of disposables by 18-24-year-old vapers fell from 52 percent in 2024 to 40 percent in 2025.
The UK ban follows similar European moves. Belgium and France became the first EU countries to ban sales of disposable vapes.
Ireland is also preparing to introduce new restrictions.
But critics have argued many users will simply switch to refillable or reusable vaping devices, which will limit the impact on nicotine consumption.
And industry experts say the ban could lead to more illegal products entering the UK market.
The bill "only makes it illegal to sell disposable vapes -- it does not prohibit their use," warned Dan Marchant, director of Vape Club, the UK's largest online vape retailer.
"We risk a surge of illegal and potentially dangerous items flooding the black market."
(AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
An all-party delegation led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad in London (X/@rsprasad)
AN all-party delegation led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad has arrived in London to reiterate India's zero-tolerance stance on terrorism.
The multi-party delegation, including MPs Daggubati Purandeswari, Priyanka Chaturvedi, Ghulam Ali Khatana, Amar Singh, Samik Bhattacharya, M Thambidurai, former minister of state MJ Akbar and ambassador Pankaj Saran, is scheduled to meet community groups, think tanks, parliamentarians and diaspora leaders.
"The All Party Delegation of MPs led by Ravi Shankar Prasad arrived in London on Saturday evening and was received by High Commissioner Vikram Doraiswami," the Indian High Commission in the UK said in a post on X.
During their three-day visit to the UK, the delegation will engage with House of Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle, foreign office minister for Indo-Pacific Catherine West, parliamentarians, think tanks and Indian diaspora representatives, the High Commission said.
The Prasad-led delegation is touring six European countries as part of India's diplomatic outreach following the terrorist attack in Pahalgam that claimed 26 lives. The delegation arrived in London after concluding visits to France, Italy and Denmark over the past week.
In Denmark's capital, Copenhagen, the delegation interacted with Danish parliamentarians, foreign affairs officials and Indian diaspora groups.
"The delegation emphasised India's zero-tolerance towards terrorism and stance that any act of violence would be responded to appropriately. India's appreciation of Denmark's public stance condemning the Pahalgam terrorist attack and the expression of solidarity with India was conveyed to the Danish side during the meetings," the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement earlier.
From the UK, the delegation will head for discussions and meetings with a cross-section of parliamentarians, political leaders and diaspora groups in the European Union (EU) and Germany.
The delegation is one of seven multi-party delegations India has tasked to visit 33 global capitals to reach out to the international community to stress Pakistan's links to terrorism.
Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir in the early hours of May 7.
Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. The Indian side responded strongly to the Pakistani actions.
The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding to stop military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan (R) interacts with General Romeo S. Brawner Jr., Chief of Staff, Armed Forces of the Philippines, on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. (X/@HQ_IDS_India via PTI Photo)
INDIA's defence chief appeared to confirm his country had lost at least one aircraft during the brief conflict with Pakistan earlier this month, he told Bloomberg in an interview.
India and Pakistan were engaged in a four-day conflict last month, their worst standoff since 1999, before a ceasefire was agreed on May 10.
More than 70 people were killed in missile, drone and artillery fire on both sides. Pakistan claimed its Chinese-supplied jets had shot down six Indian aircraft.
India's chief of defence staff, General Anil Chauhan, called Pakistan's claims that it shot down six Indian warplanes "absolutely incorrect".
But Chauhan, when pressed as to whether India had lost any jets, appeared to confirm New Delhi had lost an unspecified number of aircraft -- without giving details.
"I think, what is important is that, not the jet being down, but why they were being down," he told Bloomberg TV, speaking on the sidelines of Shangri-La Dialogue defence meeting in Singapore.
There was no immediate response from New Delhi.
On May 11, a day after the ceasefire, India's Air Marshal A.K. Bharti, speaking to reporters, had said that "all our pilots are back home", adding that "we are in a combat scenario, and that losses are a part of combat".
A senior security source said three Indian jets had crashed on home soil without giving the make or cause.
But until the comments on Saturday (31), India had not officially confirmed any of its aircraft were lost.
"The good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets, again targeting at long range," Chauhan added, speaking to Bloomberg.
"Why they were down -- that is more important for us, and what did we do after that", he added.
The recent conflict between the countries was triggered by an attack on tourists in Indian Kashmir on April 22, the deadliest on civilians in the contested Muslim-majority territory in decades.
New Delhi blamed Islamabad for backing the Islamist militants it said carried out the attack, charges that Pakistan denied.
(AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
Arooj Shah and Kamran Ghafoor during the council leadership challenge at Oldham Town Hall last Wednesday (21)
OLDHAM council leader Arooj Shah said the borough faces a ‘serious challenge around identity politics’ – with ‘every issue becoming a divisive issue’ – following a no-confidence vote mounted against her.
The town hall boss fended off the challenge at a full council meeting last Wednesday (21).
Oldham Group councillor Kamran Ghafoor made a bid for the role, claiming ‘residents have lost trust in the current administration’.
He tried to create a ‘rainbow alliance’ across political groups, but the attempt failed after four independents stood by Labour leaders.
Labour councillors called the challenge ‘a political stunt’ and accused Ghafoor of ‘unsavoury tactics’ to convince the independents supporting the administration to jump ship. Ghafoor denied the allegations.
At a full council meeting last Wednesday (21), Ghafoor said: “This Labour administration doesn’t listen. Not to this chamber. Not to the residents. Not to the people they claim to serve. We are better suited to deal with the real issues facing Oldham than this tired, out-of-touch Labour administration.”
Deputy Elaine Taylor said: “In reality, you have no pathway to govern and no plan to lead. This is just a political stunt. We’ve already heard about some of the unsavoury tactics. You have no policy suggestions, other than anti-Arooj. We have no idea what you stand for.”
Shah has been reinstated as council leader for 2025-2026. The leadership challenge echoed a similar bid made by a ‘rainbow alliance’ of independents, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats exactly a year ago.
At a Greater Manchester Civic Leadership Programme in Manchester for underrepresented identities last Thursday (May 22), Shah claimed the no-confidence vote was ‘personal’.
She later added: “This is about some people not accepting who I am, what my upbringing is, what my heritage is, what my faith is. They can never attack me on delivery, because I have delivered for this borough.”
Shah highlighted the council’s improved financial position; the recent Ofsted upgrade to a ‘good’ rating for children’s services; and much-improved high school attendence rates.
“We have a serious challenge in Oldham around identity politics,” Shah added. “Every issue becomes a divisive issue. If we fix a pothole in one area, we’re told ‘you only fix roads in white areas’. We fix a pothole in a predominantly Asian area, I’m told I ‘only look after my own’.
“I’m the leader of a council. My job is to bring people together, not divide them.”
Ghafoor said: “We remain committed to equality, fairness, and mutual respect. Criticism of councillor Shah’s leadership has never been about her gender. “It has always been about accountability, transparency, and the quality of her leadership. Reducing it to identity politics is a disservice to the many women – and men – who believe in genuine, inclusive representation.”
Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham told BBC Radio Manchester: “People should put place first rather than party first and pull together for Oldham. That’s what we try to do. It’s what the leader tries to do.
“It’s best to get in a position where the place is at the forefront. Oldham have got some really exciting plans around Oldham Athletic, which we will support.”